Monday, October 19, 2009

Lamont Slaps Specter With The Bottom Of His Shoe

Ned Lamont, the Greenwich millionaire who earned the undying gratitude of netrooters by opposing present Sen. Joe Lieberman in a primary some time ago, has taken himself to Pennsylvania to lend his support to Joe Sestak, a Democrat of high principle running against incumbent Democrat (for the moment) Sen. Arlen Specter.

A registered Democrat in 1965, Specter ran for District Attorney on the Republican ticket. He handily beat incumbent Jim Crumlish, thereafter changing his registration to Republican, temporarily as it turns out. Specter the Republican revered to his old party a short while ago and became a Democrat when polls showed him loosing to Club For Growth head Pat Toomey, an upstart Republican very much like Ned Lamont. Described by the Pennsylvania Report in 2003 as one of the "vanishing breed of Republican moderates," Specter now has vanished into the maw of the Democratic Party.

If all this seems a little opportunistic, it is.

If it seems confusing, it may be because in places like Pennsylvania and Connecticut political parties have become clubs rather than political organizations. The real parties are the incumbent politicians. Lieberman and Specter are petite political parties. They have their own constituencies, their own staffs, their own money machines, and their own newspapers, sometimes called in the business “press releases.” For someone like Specter, a political party is nothing more that the flag under which he chooses to wage a political campaign.

Over at Political, Matthew Harrington points out some of the ironies as viewed from the Republican corner of the political barracks:

“Arlen Specter’s departure from the Republican party is a delicious irony. For the past two decades, conservatives in the party have been told that they need to abandon their principles in order to protect “northeast Republicans” like Arlen Specter, Lowell Weicker, Susan Collins, James Jeffords and Olympia Snow.

“In 2004, the national GOP refused to support a true conservative and instead backed Specter. President George Bush and the Republican establishment strongly supported Specter on the grounds that the Republicans could ill afford to lose the seat. They poured thousands of dollars and countless man-hours into Specter’s campaign. Five years later, Specter returns the favor by walking away only three weeks after assuring the national electorate that the loss of a single Republican seat would be a disaster for the Republic.”

Connecticut Bob expresses his distaste for oily politicians and the congressional good old boy network from the left.


CT Bob said...

Good take on the current situation regarding Specter. I detest the way Arlan (and Joe Lieberman, for that matter) didn't hesitate to throw their party allegiance out the window the moment their longtime ride on the Senate gravy train was threatened.

There's definitely something wrong with that.

Don Pesci said...

True. Here in CT, the Republican Party suffers from a lack of ideological (in the good sense) definition. This is true in the whole Northeast. Part of the reason for that is that the Republican Party has been represented for so long by moderates, who in turn lack definition. Weicker was to the Republican Party what some on the left think Lieberman is to the Democratic Party, a bit of fearful symmetry there. I’m not sure what it means that, in his campaign against Lieberman, Lamont chose to ally himself with Weicker and Tom D’Amore; but, whatever the reason, that should be a red flag to Democrats. Now, we are told by some Democrats that if Lamont should choose to run for, say, governor, he will tack to the right. This kind of political opportunism indicates a lack of ballast. The problem with the entire Northeast, but most especially Connecticut, is that it has in it 1 ½ political parties. When the ½ is eliminated entirely, you get -- Hartford.

Featured Post

Occam’s Razor And The Middle East

The Middle East, we are told, is complex. That is true, but there is little point in making the complex more complex. We in the We...