Skip to main content

Maureen Dowd vs Chris Murphy

 

Maureen Dowd, a longtime New York Times columnist who never has been over friendly to Donald Trump, was interviewed recently by Bill Maher, and she laid down the law, so to speak, to the Democrat Party.

 

In the course of a discussion with Maher on the recently released movie Snow White, “New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd declared Democrats are ‘in a coma’ while giving a blunt diagnosis of the party she argued had become off-putting to voters,” Fox News reported.

 

The Democrats, Dowd said, stopped "paying attention" to the long term political realignment of the working class. "Also,” she added, “they just stopped being any fun. I mean, they made everyone feel that everything they said and did, and every word was wrong, and people don't want to live like that, feeling that everything they do is wrong."

 

"Do you think we're over that era?" Maher asked.

 

“No," Dowd answered. "I think Democrats are just in a coma. They haven't figured [it] out." And later she added, "I think that Democrats just [became] a suffocating persona where you just couldn't do anything or say anything that wasn't to be criticized."

 

People in Connecticut may recognize all this as a word perfect description of U.S. Senator Chris Murphy’s  frothing  X (Twitter) account.

 

It will not do to defend the indefensible, Dowd courageously declared well ahead of many pro-Joe Biden Democrat supporters. She referenced Biden’s disabling frailty months prior to the now infamous CNN debate, after which Biden was thrown out of the Democrat Party plane without a parachute by his former supporters.

 

"Biden is not just in a bubble,” Dowd wrote at the time, “He’s in bubble wrap. Cosseting and closeting Uncle Joe all the way to the end — eschewing town halls and the Super Bowl interview — are just not going to work. Going on defense, when Trump is on offense, is not going to work. Counting on Trump’s vileness to secure the win, as Hillary did, is not going to work.”

 

Trump, recently elevated to a second four year term as president after a lapse of four years, has proven to be, much to the consternation of leading neo-progressive Democrats such as Murphy, remarkably resilient and, most annoying to Democrats, unexpectedly popular.

 

Murphy, a rising light among left wing never-Trumpers, has been salting his carefully arranged town hall speeches in his home state, with his own raucous supporters. Murphy’s “Town Hall” gatherings are tightly scripted and choreographed, rather more like huddles among team players and cheer leaders than true Town Hall meetings that tend to be entertaining and raucous affairs – “fun” in Dowd’s terminology.

 

“The event was posted in the Indivisible Facebook group on Tuesday—four days before the Town Hall—“ the Connecticut Centinal  reported concerning a similar event in Stamford, “and it wasn't even advertised, according to Murphy, except via an email just to those who have contacted his office.”

 

Murphy is no Maureen Dowd, but then Dowd, content with being an observant ink-stained wretch, has no ambitions for high office. There is a lean and hungry look about Murphy. “Let me have men about me that are fat,” said Shakespeare’s Caesar, “sleek-headed men and such as sleep a-nights. Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; he thinks too much. Such men are dangerous.”

 

The riff on Murphy is that he is a serious campaigner but not a serious politician. He has in the past been able to haul in massive donations for his fellow Democrats in Connecticut’s all Democrat U.S. Congressional Delegation, and this has assured him a degree of respect among neo-progressive Democrats and left leaning Connecticut media helpmates. Because Connecticut has for decades been a one-party state, the state’s legacy media has over the years learned to dance to the tune of the ruling party. Nothing personal, we are to assume. It’s just political business.

 

Murphy has enormous political advantages in Connecticut, as deep blue a state as faltering California. Some have said that Murphy is Connecticut’s Gavin Newsom, another lean and hungry neo-progressive now dressing himself up as a “moderate” Democrat.

 

Winston Churchill used to call such political pretenders “wolves in wolves’ clothing.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...