"No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the Legislature is in session” -- Gideon John Tucker All neo-progressive Democrats in Connecticut understand perfectly the progressivity principle. The principle was most clearly stated by Karl Marx in the Critique of the Gotha Program — “ From each according to his ability to each according to his needs.” An old wise woman once expressed perfectly the spirit of neo-progressivism politicians when she told her teenage son, this intended as a criticism, “So, what you mean is: What’s yours is mine, and what’s mine is mine too.” Neo-progressivism is the political means by which socialistic retributive economic justice is achieved. This principle was very much front and center in a recent discussion among Democrat Party leaders. If taxes are to be redistributed from millionaires to those less economically endowed, then it is obvious that the redistributors should take care NOT to apply tax cuts or c...
If a state-imposed regulation increases the cost of homeschooling in all state municipalities, which organ of government – the state or the municipality – should absorb the costs? Should a state tax credit be given to homeschooling parents? A parent who chooses to homeschool his children is not relieved of the tax paid for public education. In effect, he or she is paying twice to educate his child: once for an anonymous child who receives the benefit of the public school tax dollars that his child is not receiving, and again for the additional costs of homeschooling. And the costs added to homeschooling by Senate President Pro Tempore Looney’s imperative reforms, according to a March 15 th story in the Hartford Courant – “Looney: We have to keep moving” -- is sizeable. Education Commissioner Charlene Russell-Tucker said, the Courant noted, “that 1,800 children left public schools for homeschooling in the last fiscal year, along with anothe...