The title of the story in the Hartford Courant read: “Connecticut Senate Democrats pass tighter restrictions on ICE agents, right to sue agents.” And the lede said everything worth saying: “HARTFORD, Conn. — Prompted by shootings and heavy-handed tactics [by ICE], the [neo-progressive Democrat controlled] state Senate voted on party lines Tuesday night for a new state civil rights law that would allow Connecticut citizens to sue federal immigration agents…The controversial measure would permit civil lawsuits against federal officials if citizens believed that their civil rights had been violated.” That is to say: Neo-progressive Democrats in Connecticut, leading by the nose a disappearing remnant of liberal state Democrats, intend, through constitutionally questionable legislation, to remove partial immunity from federal law enforcement agents – so that non-citizens of the United States may sue in court federal agents who wish to detain them. Connecticut’s new “civil rights l...
Ain’t it perfectly honest to charge a good price and make a profit on my investment and foresight? Of course, it is. Well, that’s honest graft -- George Plunkitt of Tammany Hall Corruption, we know, is a staple of kingly arrogance. In a unitary one party state, corruption corrupts absolutely, for obvious reasons. When power remains undivided in a state, the only guard against political corruption, so we have been told, is a vigilant media. A nudge from the Feds and a six month old attempt by Connecticut Republicans to reform the state’s earmarks structure has awakened the virtuous juices of a handful of Connecticut’s reporters. About six months ago, Republican leaders in the General Assembly – state representative in the House Vince Candelora and state senators Rob Sampson and Steve Harding -- issued a mini-manifesto on earmarks and ended by “ proposing the following legislative reforms which would apply to all...