“The difference between the right word and the wrong word is the difference between a lightning bolt and a lightning bug” -- Mark Twain Everyone in Connecticut, perhaps including political writers, should know by this time nearly everything they were afraid to ask about Maine Democrat U.S. Senatorial prospect Graham Platner . Thomas Feeney in the Washington Examiner has provided us with a shortened version of Platner’s resume. Leveling a criticism at what is still amusingly called The Mainstream Media, Feeney writes: “There is also no excuse for not looking at the candidate’s social media profile. Clearly, the Democrats missed what one news outlet characterized as “a slew of horrifying posts made on Reddit [in which he disparaged] women, rape victims, minorities, veterans, cops and working-class voters. Moreover, might it not have seemed off-putting to voters that the candidate sent sexual text messages to numerous women while he was married, as reported nationall...
As a general rule, incumbent politicians do not like audits. An audit is a scrupulous examination, political and economic, of a politician’s record in office. If the audited politician’s career in office is at an end, an audit, usually performed by the opposition party, may seem redundant. What is the point of beating a dead political horse? These strictures would seem to apply to former New Britain Mayor Erin Stewart’s career-ending audit about which much reportorial and commentary ink has been spilled. At this point, it seems safe to say that Stewart’s political reputation has suffered irremediable damage. Stewart’s withdrawal from her race for Governor of Connecticut on the Republican ticket was occasioned by the publication of an audit’s findings. The audit was commissioned by the incoming Democrat Mayor of New Britain, Robert (Bobby) Sanchez, and conducted by a putative “non-partisan” law firm, Crumbie Law Group. In recent days, we find another audit has tickled the interest o...