Skip to main content

Is There A Boudin In Connecticut’s Political Mineshaft

Chesa Boudin, defective

Political language – and with variations, this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists – is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind –
George Orwell

California, most people understand, has been the petri dish of postmodern progressivism. Early in June, District Attorney Chesa Boudin of San Francisco was recalled, apparently for having failed to do his job.

The recall vote was unambiguously decisive. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on June 7, “San Francisco voters overwhelmingly voted to remove District Attorney Chesa Boudin from office on Tuesday, favoring a recall effort that argued his progressive reforms were too lenient and made the city less safe.

“Boudin trailed by about 20 percentage points Tuesday evening, according to the latest figures from city elections officials. Around 60% of San Franciscans who cast ballots voted to recall him.”

The charge against Boudin was led by Mary Jung, a chairwoman of the recall campaign, who later observed, “This election does not mean that San Francisco has drifted to the far right on our approach to criminal justice. In fact, San Francisco has been a national beacon for progressive criminal justice reform for decades and will continue to do so with new leadership.”

This being San Francisco, there were two sides to the recall.

USA Today reported, “Recall proponents said Boudin was ideologically inflexible and inexperienced, often siding with criminals instead of victims. Recall opponents said the recall was a Republican power grab meant to undermine public safety reforms.”

Boudin quickly claimed victim status, the default position for postmodern progressives when a tide turns against them. "This is not a recall campaign interested in safety or in truth or in justice or in solutions,” Boudin said at a campaign event surrounded by Asian American, African American and Latino community leaders. “It's interested in division, in fear and spreading hate and undermining policies ... that make our communities safer."

The communities have now expressed their disagreement with Boudin by recalling him.

The USA report thought it worth mentioning that “Boudin was a baby when his parents, left-wing Weather Underground radicals, served as drivers in a botched 1981 robbery in New York that left two police officers and a security guard dead. They were sentenced to decades in prison.

“While campaigning, he spoke of the pain of stepping through metal detectors to hug his parents and vowed to reform a system that tears apart families. Kathy Boudin was released on parole in 2003 and died of cancer in May. David Gilbert was granted parole in October.”

A Yahoo News account laid out in lurid detail the case against Boudin.

Boudin’s troubles did not truly begin until the last day of 2020, when a driver killed two women in central San Francisco on New Year’s Eve. The suspect, Troy McAlister, had been cycling through the Bay Area criminal justice system for years, but a plea deal earlier that year with the district attorney’s office had freed him, and critics tied Boudin to the attack.

Just a month later, a jogger was struck and killed by the driver of a stolen car. The victim, Sheria Musyoka, had emigrated from Kenya to attend Dartmouth College. He had recently moved to San Francisco with his wife and young child. Suspected driver Jerry Lyons was, like McAlister, a repeat offender — the very kind of person Boudin argued nonpunitive policies could help.

Instead, he found himself increasingly on the defensive after the two killings, his protestation of blamelessness coming across as callous to some. Musyoka’s widow, Hannah Ege, bluntly said that Boudin was at fault. “This freak accident was no freak accident,” she told a local outlet. “It was someone who was out in the public who should not have been out in public.”

Boudin was also seemingly flummoxed by the rise in anti-Asian violence, describing the killing of 84-year-old Vicha Ratanapakdee as the result of a “temper tantrum on the part of the 19-year-old assailant. The following month, a man fatally shot six Asian women in Atlanta, bringing the crisis of anti-Asian violence to the fore of the national conversation. Though he tried to depict himself as an ally of the city’s large and influential Chinese-language community, the effort fell far short.

One of the reasons “crime doesn’t pay” in the United States is that there are plenty of prosecutors about who make sure that criminals pay for their crimes. Boudin was not one of these, and that is why he was given the boot by San Franciscans who were not prepared to shut their eyes to “lies that make murder respectable.”

If there is a Boudin in Connecticut’s political mineshaft, he could not be recalled, because the state, much less progressive than California on this one point, has no recall provision.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e