Skip to main content

The Case Against Anti-Trumpism in Connecticut

Trump

Anti-Trumpism in Connecticut has been a politically profitable business among Connecticut Democrat office holders.

There are two categories of anti-Trumpists: those whose numerous beefs against former President Donald Trump are rational, and those who are partisan politicians pushing what appears to them to be a successful campaign ploy. Trump is in many ways the perfect Democrat Party foil. He falls outside a traditional Republican Party box, and his volatile character is unsettling among those who are easily unsettled.

Voters across the nation, even in Democrat bastions such as Connecticut, understand the difference between the two categories of anti-Trumpists mentioned above.

Connecticut, home of Yale and the cunningly amusing Colin McEnroe, is not a state brimming over with political rubes who are putty in the hands of Machiavellian politicians. Across much of the nation, the general voting public has more or less “come of age” in our sometime confusing, postmodern 21st century.

People in Connecticut know for example that Trump – got up in horns, a tail and cloven hooves in a fevered Democrat Party imagination – is no longer, if he ever was, a danger to the American Republic.

Yet even now, Trump, though he left office 17 months ago, is almost daily put on a hobby horse by leading Connecticut Democrats and displayed everywhere as a politically dead El Cid -- to spook easily frightened Republicans, who are daily invited to hurl derogations in the direction of the former titular head of the Republican Party. Most Connecticut Republicans wisely decline the invitation.

And some of the braver ones are eager to offer a comparison between Trump the Terrible and Lunch-pail Joe Biden, the current U.S. President.

Trump was partly successful in stemming illegal entry to the US across a fortified border designed to steer immigrants to legal points of entry. Under Biden, the border has become what lawyers call a “legal fiction.”

It was Biden, not Trump, who turned Afghanistan into a rout, leaving those in the country who had supported a largely successful 20 year U.S. military operation in the iron grip of a militant Taliban that even President Barack Obama agreed was a “terrorist organization.”

It was not Trump’s progeny but Biden’s son and brother who reaped monetary gain from Ukraine, China and Russia, passing along a portion of it, according to Hunter Biden’s emails on an abandoned computer, to then Vice President Biden, who had been warned by Obama officials that the VP might be circulating too close to a burning candle. While Trump’s son-in-law was bringing together Arabs and Jews in the Middle East, Hunter Biden, now an artist, was raking in the dough – in part, for “the Big Guy,” he noted.

Energy supplies were abundant and low cost during the Trump administration. They have been deflated and made exceedingly expensive under Biden, a captive of environmental overpromising.

Inflation was manageable during the Trump administration. It is now raging, like a California wildfire, under Biden who, along with U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal, has a comic book understanding of what inflation really is and its connection to the printing of devalued dollars by the Fed and ungovernable spending in  a time of post-COVID job drought. Hint: Inflation is – too many dollars chasing too few goods and services.

All the national polls indicate that the Biden administration is suffering from a policy undertow, and not an inability on the part of Washington wordsmiths to properly fashion a communication slant that would convince voters, who have come of age in hyper-partisan political environment, that up is down, left is right, and the extremist view on abortion of Blumenthal, up for re-election in November, is normative and scientific.

Democrats in Connecticut really do expect Republicans running for office in the state to run away from Trump with their pants on fire, leaving a politically profitable field for Democrats to till.

Their expectations may or may not be correct, but a broad swath of voters already has taken the measure of Biden and left-of-center politicking. According to many polls, unaffiliateds, soccer moms concerned with the woke nature of curricula in public schools, many Republicans, some U.S. Senator Joe Manchin Democrats, some left-leaning Democrats satisfied with White House rhetoric but disappointed with a President who seems unable to bring home the political bacon, some African Americans locked for generations in inescapable urban welfare traps, working folk worried about the toll inflation has taken on their diminishing assets, and, surprisingly, some few left-of-center media scribblers, are all turning their faces against postmodern progressivism.

As inflation – increasing prices and the devaluation of the dollar – rises, support for the Democrat Party, even here in deep blue Connecticut, must dip.

In the upcoming elections, policy, not campaign mystification, will turn the tide.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...