Skip to main content

Foley On Foley


Two appearances by Republican Party gubernatorial hopeful Tom Foley, one on WFSB’s “Face the State” and another on NPR’s “Where We Live” program, have produced a raft of hearty criticism from Connecticut’s left of center media.

The most interesting Foley response was a letter written to the Hartford CourantMr. Foley made two points in his letter: 1) Three of the four charges he made in his “Face The State” appearance were true, and the fourth has yet to be denied unequivocally by Governor Dannel Malloy; 2) The people of Connecticut rightfully expect their politicians to be free of even the appearance of corruption, a point repeated ad nauseam in thousands of political reports and editorials.


“What you are seeing,” Mr. Foley wrote, “is not a political strategy, but who I am.”

And who is that?

Some political commentators in the past were convinced that Mr. Foley was Connecticut’s version of former Republican Party presidential candidate Mitt Romney, little more than an upper class robber baron. When such imputations were being leveled by some Connecticut Democrats and left of center political columnists, very few editorial board editors defended either Mr. Foley or Mr. Romney.

But then, that’s politics, isn’t it? If you don’t like the heat, it’s best to steer clear of the political kitchen.

In bare knuckle political campaigns, it’s nearly impossible to find the real Romney, the Real Foley or the real Malloy in a political theater crowded with political partisans, some of whom sit on the editorial boards of newspapers, buried as the sinners are beneath mounds of stones thrown by political opponents.

It’s pointless to be naive in the political arena, isn’t it?

“Maybe I am naive about how the government's business ‘really’ gets done,” Mr. Foley wrote in his letter to the Courant, “and romantic about the power of good leadership and good government. But if that's what I am, then so are most of the citizens of our state. You don't have to travel far from the Capitol or a newsroom to find that most citizens expect their public officials will be careful with their tax dollars, will choose policies based on what is in the public interest and will not have their hands in the cookie jar. It is important that they continue to expect and believe this.”

It will not be long before some world weary commentator instructs us that such political naiveté ought to be considered a disqualification for office in Connecticut. If you are not a viper, stay out of the viper pit.


WARNING: NOTHING IN THIS BLOG ENTREE IS TO BE CONSIDERED AS AN AFFIRMATION OF THE TRUTH OF ANY STATEMENT THUS FAR MADE BY MR. FOLEY.

Comments

dmoelling said…
Foley doesn't appear to be a fool to me. The uniform and high decibel response from the established press (including those not normally hyper partisan) seems to indicate something's there. This is a major are of neglect in todays press. The old gumshoes were basically private detectives with a flair for the pen. But today's reporters wait till it's safe. Look at the great story by the Detroit Free Press on the causes of Detroit's bankruptcy. All data driven, yet all after the fact when they took no risks. HOw about today's CT press?
Don Pesci said…
DM,

Perfect.

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...