Skip to main content

A Glass Half Full Is Still A Glass Half Empty


After all the palavering in the state legislature, last year’s budget is still in the red.

It appears that the wall-eyed legislature and outgoing Gov. Jodi Rell, after much political posturing and acrimony, underestimated the preceding year’s budget deficit by about a half billion dollars, according to figures supplied by State Comptroller Nancy Wyman shortly after last year's budget was put to bed.

At the same time, the legislature, led by President Pro Tem of the Senate Don Williams and House Speaker Chris Donovan, persistently showing their pique at the governor’s unwillingness to further beggar the state by increasing more taxes, took off for the hills every time the governor threatened to reduce spending.

That’s the good news.

The bad news is that in three years, the state could be facing a budget deficit upward of $5.9 billion, a figure that sould convince the remaining optimimists among us that a glass half full is still a glass half empty.

Aware of the economic anvil about to fall on Connecticut’s head, a Hartford paper in a Sunday editorial pointed a crooked finger at legislative leaders Williams and Donovan.

Chief economist for the Connecticut Business and Industry Association Peter Gioia, the paper said, had offered the governor – and through her, the legislature – three money saving ideas: 1) switch from a nursing home centered health care model to a far less expensive home care model; 2) privatize state operated group homes for the disabled; 3) close prisons.

Let us adopt these measures, the paper advised, and begin the painful but necessary process of reducing the state’s insupportable spending plan. Almost as an aside, the paper noted, “There will be, to be sure, some complications with state labor contracts and federal funding rules. Nonetheless, millions of dollars can be saved. This can be done.”

"Some complications" -- really?

What is the evidence that state unions will not use their influence with Williams and Donovan, once a union leader himself, to un-facilitate the money saving measures suggested by the paper?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e