Skip to main content

The Battle For Attorney General

Facing abysmally low poll ratings, U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd chose to bump himself off a few days ago, wherefore all the professional politicians who for years thought Dodd was bee’s knees breathed a huge collective sigh of relief.

Republicans scratched their heads in dismay when Caligula announced his availability for Dodd’s seat.

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, never one to shy from a camera -- having waited what was for him a decent interval before Dodd’s corpse, metaphorically speaking, had been trundled off the stage, a mere two hours – jumped into the race and later made an appearance on Fox News the same day as Dodd’s valedictory.

Most pollsters have already anointed Attorney General Richard Blumenthal as Connecticut’s next U.S. Senator. But Professor Gary Rose, Chairman of the Department of Government and Politics at Fairfield University, is not quite ready to leap on the bandwagon. Rose has an issue with Blumenthal’s TV presence.

“There’s not the most appealing image on TV,” he said. “He looks anemic or gaunt. Not healthy. I don’t know if that’s going to play out. I think it could.”

A little pancake makeup might do wonders.

At least one Democrat who has had her eyes on the gubernatorial prize, the mercurial Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz, is now looking lustily at the position, a political gold brick, that will be left vacant by Blumenthal. Bysiewicz told Shelly Sindland of Fox news that she was “assessing” a switch. Co-chairman of the legislature’s Judiciary Committee Mike Lawlor who, along with his confederate in the senate, Andrew McDonald, attempted sometime back to rearrange the apostolic structure of the Catholic Church, is also assessing.

It’s hard to believe that the attorney General’s office used to be a part time position. It was current Sen. Joe Lieberman who made the office what it is today – a meandering mess without statutory borders, a baby step removed from a utopian tyranny. For as long as Blumenthal was and is attorney general, no one in the state was or is safe from his withering reach. Blumenthal, the state’s consumer-protector-in-chief, is the closest Connecticut has come to producing a vigorous, progressive, autocratic Caligula, the 1st century Roman Caesar who also had that lean and hungry look, the hallmark of utopianists come to save the earth from its folly.

The attorney general’s office has sovereign immunity from prosecution -- which means, if Connecticut’s Caligula violates your 14th Amendment Constitutional rights by depriving you of your property without giving you the opportunity to respond to his sometime fictional charges before a judge, you have no recourse to temper his behavior through a well deserved money suit.

What petty Caligula would not want to wield such unbridled and loathsome powers?

Bysiewicz, should she decide to jump onto Blumenthal’s empty shoes, will not be alone in the tousle for the gold brick.

In addition to Pope Lawlor and Bysiewicz, past chairman of the state Democratic Party George Jepsen has expressed interest. In an attempt to give a boot to the often berated Sen. Joe Lieberman, Jepsen accused the embattled senator of having exalted “morality over personal loyalty in excoriating President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, yet demanded personal loyalty from Connecticut Democrats in 2006 who opposed the Iraq war on moral grounds.”

At some point before assuming divinity like proportions as attorney general, Jepsen might want to walk that statement out the door since 1) even Bill Clinton, after a chat with his wife and his political handlers, more or less admitted moral culpability in inserting cigars in odd orifices; and 2) every Democrat’s dream president, Barack Obama, is now demanding personal loyalty from Connecticut Democrats who may oppose his efforts to make war upon Afghanistan, portions of Pakistan, the pirates of Somalia, and possibly Nigeria, the home of underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

As usual, the warmongering Lieberman is happy to oblige.

In any case, it might be real nice, from a Democratic point of view, if Joe were to lend his support to Blumenthal’s campaign; it might do some good, and it certainly would not hurt Jepsen in his effort to assume the mantle of Caligula.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...