Skip to main content

08 Predictions: Happy New Year

It’s always a hazard to make predictions, because future events depend upon current events that change rapidly. The best sort of prediction is a vow: “I pledge in the New Year to be kinder to my friends and more hostile to my enemies.”

This sort of prediction depends solely on will power and determination, which always lie in the hand of the vow taker. Predictions about historic events are always iffy. History, as a rule, snatches the better angels of our nature from us and consigns them to Hell. The careful reader will note that I have capitalized “Hell.” This, with apologies to honorable atheists among us, is because it is a place name for a real place, as yet undiscoverable by the spiritually vacuous tools of modern science.

The following are safe predictions because, with the exception of #7, they are limited to what will not happen in the coming year.

1) Bloggers -- who are nasty, brutish and short (with just about everybody) – will continue on their private path to Hell (note the capitalization): The Jew baiters will continue to bait the honorable Joe Lieberman, and he will continue to respond in kind; Chris Dodd will continue to call for an “immediate” (as soon as practicable) withdrawal of American troops from Iraq at precisely that moment in history when the presence of surging troops have thwarted the bloodier of the jihadists – talk about nasty, brutal and short! – who have designs on Saudi Arabia, thoroughly corrupted by a rapid accumulation of wealth, Iran, Iraq, and other places in the Middle East where oil sprouts from the ground (not that we care about oil); Hillary Clinton will continue to press for a repeat of the Camelot days of the first Bill Clinton ascendancy, when bombing ibuprofen factories in Iraq was considered a sufficient response to dictators that successfully defied the sacred mandates of the United Nations.

2) Neither Chris Dodd nor Ron Paul will become president.

3) Neither Bill Curry -- a two time gubernatorial loser, confidant of the aforementioned Bill Clinton and a columnist for the Hartford Courant, now owned by real estate magnate Sam Zell – nor Colin McEnroe, a dark souled humorist who unadvisedly wanders into the deep waters of political discussions and promptly drowns, will give up Buddhism in favor of Christian fundamentalism. There seems to be some discussion concerning who “owns” the Courant, real estate magnate Sam Zell, who bought the property from Times Mirror, or the employees of the Courant. The person who may dispose of the property is the proper owner: That would be real estate magnate Sam Zell.

4) Lou DeLuca will in the future not be talking to FBI sting operators disguised as Mafi hitmen, unless in the presence of his lawyer.

5) The Harford Courant, now owned by real estate magnate Sam Zell, will not be hiring a bona fide conservative columnist to balance the uber-liberal commentariate that presently disports on its pages – even though, thanks to Party Chairman Chris Healy and other right of center Republicans, there is in medialand an untapped well of readers hungry for conservative opinion in Connecticut’s liberal backwater. Evidentially, the Courant’s current owner, real estate magnate Sam Zell, does not wish to capitalize on this untapped money supply.

6) The Democrat controlled US Congress will not end the war in Iraq by de-financing it.

7) At some point down the line, Connecticut’s Republican Party will offer unyielding resistance to the state’s ever burgeoning budget by offering a program of tax cuts (not rebates -- real tax cuts) and spending cuts. The party will organize behind a proposal to eliminate the state’s income tax and replace it with a either a flat income tax or a sales tax -- not both -- that will both relieve current businesses of onerous taxes and encourage new business growth in the state, resulting in increased revenues that will not be spent augmenting teacher’s salaries. The excess revenue will be used to support traditional family structures in urban areas blighted by single family households, absent fathers and drug dealing among armed preteens.

The reader should be warned that #7 is subject to the vagaries of historical circumstances, very iffy, and therefore less certain that #’s 1-6.

But hope springs eternal.

Comments

mccommas said…
Chris Healey is right of Center?

Hummmm....

-- Well maybe in Connecticut you can get away with that.

Number 7# I assume does not include the current governor.

I will predict that RINO Rell -- and this is just wishful thinking -- will appoint ONE real Republican conservative judge (as in read the law as written, recognize constitutional rights and be tough on bad guys in sentencing) in 2008.

-- And she will do all that without the help of a committee or even look at the most recent public opinion polls!

Now that really is wishful thinking....
Don Pesci said…
Rell's batting average is not very good in this regard. Had she a little spine, she might have challenged the Democrats who torpedoed the Zarella Supreme Court Justice nomination. He's a heavy lifter; Rell's replacement appointment is a lightweight, which is why she was acceptable to the usual culprits on the Judiciary Committee.
mccommas said…
Yep.
Anonymous said…
Yes, Ron Paul will not win. But his poll numbers give hope. Hope that Americans are hearing and liking a new message, that message the founding fathers gave and fought for.

As for "lower than margin of error" Dodd. After the Iowa numbers come in, let's all email him properties for sale in New Hampshire.

Hey, Don, thanks for a great year of blogging. You are a must read for me. I don't like it when you take a week off. I wish I had your historical grasp.

cttaxed.com

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p