Skip to main content

Gaffey, You Be Up

With the first two paragraphs of a column by Kevin Rennie that ran in the Hartford Courant on Sunday, we were off to the races. “Lust for power is merely ambition,” Rennie wrote. “Lust and power together, however, can make trouble. The question is whether that potent cocktail cost taxpayers $1 billion this year because of a secret relationship between a high-ranking legislator and a state university vice chancellor. While they were pushing the bonding package, they were bonding.”

The “lust” to which Rennie refers is the affection and high regard that State Sen. Thomas Gaffey, D-Meriden, chairman of the Education Committee and vice chairman of the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee, had for Jill Ferraiolo, associate vice chancellor for government relations and communications at the Connecticut State University System.

CSUS was created during the gubernatorial administration of Lowell Weicker, who pulled up his deep-rooted Connecticut stakes and moved to Virginia recently – some suggest because, among other reasons, he wanted to avoid a possible up tick in income taxes levied against rich folk in Connecticut. Weicker is primarily responsible for introducing Connecticut to its new income tax, and Democrats have been struggling for years after Weicker left office to introduce more progressivity (fairness?) into the tax structure. Translation: They mean to get money from millionaires like Weicker to pay for their spending excesses. They have been thwarted in this design by two moderate Republican governors, ex-Governor John Rowland who served some time in jail for peculation, and present Governor Jodi Rell. The general feeling is that Rell is a weak reed rather than a strong firewall, and Democrats are nothing if not persistent.

CSUS was created by Weicker, among other reasons, to provide a cushion for Bill Cibes, who ran for governor on an income tax ticket, was soundly defeated and managed to find a spot in the Weicker administration as the head of the Office of Policy Management. Shortly before the Weicker administration trailed off into irrelevance, Cibes moved into plush offices as Chancellor of CSUS. The cushion broke his fall from politics and saved his rather large posterior. In Connecticut, the relationship between the average politician and the average state worker political appointee is incestuous.


But when Rennie refers to “power” and “lust,” he does not mean to indicate back scratching political relationships of the Weicker, Cibes variety; he means real lust, not the lust for power, status and money.

Ferraiolo, an associate vice chancellor for government relations and communications whose principal responsibility is to lobby legislators on behalf of CSUS, and Gaffney “became allies,” according to a Courant story, in the quest for a billion dollars the legislature was considering providing to the state university system that includes Eastern, Central, Southern and Western. Unlike lobbyists in the private sector, Ferraiolo is a state employee.

Readers who enjoy Barbara Cartland novels will find a bit of steam in Rennie’s account:

June was not a good month for Ferraiolo. In June, Joseph Ferraiolo, married for 18 years, sued his wife for divorce, citing adultery, a pointed claim in an age when the vague "irreconcilable differences" suffices. The couple divorced in October. Their three young children live mostly with their dad under the divorce agreement. A highly unusual paragraph in it precludes the parties and their lawyers from discussing their grievances. It punishes any leaks. Husbands and wives don't usually worry about leaks, but politicians do.

“As the summer ended, Gaffey and Ferraiolo were living in a convoluted e-mail world, one that could have been written by Barbara Cartland with some Stephen King creeping in. In August, Ferraiolo oohs and aahs at a Gaffey favor for a mutual friend. He declares, "I move mountains for my friends." In September, brace yourself, she proclaims him a "god." "Alongside every god is a great goddess," reads his modest reply. News from Gaffey that he's had a call from an editor at The New York Times has Ferraiolo repeating in capitals that he is indeed a god. Another exchange finds Zeus offering bon mots in French. Power rarely improves the judgment of those who wield it
.”

Gaffney, his ethical scruples awakened by press stories, sent a query to the state’s Ethics Commission, which promptly pronounced that he was not in disfavor. The code of ethics applies to lobbyists in the private sector, and Ferraiolo is a public employee.

President Pro Tem of the state senate, Don Williams, was trotted out to say that because Gaffey was not in violation of the code of ethics for public officials, an assertion that may be premature, the senate will not look into the matter any further.

Barbara Cartland over at the Courant thinks otherwise. Sex, power and glory have a Big-Mo of their own.

“Ferraiolo and Gaffey,” Rennie writes, “had better start gathering receipts for the state's ethics agency. Shortly after the bill was passed, the Senate Democrats requested an opinion from the Office of State Ethics on Gaffey's role in the legislation, but failed to ask about any benefits he may have derived from his relationship with Ferraiolo.

“Legislators who knew of the relationship but remained silent deceived their colleagues” as in:

What a wicked web we weave
When once we practice to deceive
.”

Comments

Bob Swick said…
As a taxpayer I love the two sets of rules that Republicans and Democrats exist by. I would be very comfortable if both Ferraiolo and Gaffey both resign their positions immediately and stop wasting my hard earned tax dollars.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p