Skip to main content

Murphy’s Democracy

Murphy masked

The countdown has begun. The much reviled President Trump, most people will agree, is due to vacate the White House by January 20, 2021, shortly after Joe Biden is sworn into office.

A little more than two weeks before Trump’s  pending eviction, the following headline appeared on Tuesday, January 5 below the fold on the front page of the Hartford Courant: “A Real Attack On Democracy’: Sen. Murphy condemns Trump-backed effort to overturn Biden’s victory.”

The story is stuffed with quotes from both Connecticut’s U.S. Senators, Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, identified in the story as “one of Donald Trump’s sharpest critics throughout Trump’s presidency,” a considerable understatement.

“Throughout the Trump administration,” Courant reporter Eliza Fawcett tells us, “which draws to a close on Jan. 20, Murphy and his colleague Sen. Richard Blumenthal have been vocal critics of Trump. Both were strong proponents of the Congressional investigation into Trump’s July 2019 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy (sic), which was at the center of Trump’s impeachment by the House of Representatives last year. Trump was subsequently acquitted in the Senate.”

Actually, there were a few “centers” to the nearly four year attempt by Democrats, Blumenthal and Murphy prominent among them, to invalidate the 2016 presidential election in which Trump defeated Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Neither Blumenthal nor Murphy have characterized that attempt as an “assault on democracy,” possibly because they vigorously supported the failed attempt, which lasted the entire length of the Trump presidency and was centered in a false “dossier” concocted by former British Spy Christopher Steele working in concert with the Democrat National Committee. The dossier was deployed in a secret FISA court hearing to launch the extensive investigation of possible “collusion,” not found, between Trump and agents of Russian President Vladimir Putin. During the whole of the Trump administration, his frenetic Democrat opponents have got into the bad habit of discharging their own political sins upon politically convenient scapegoats. 

But why, at this remove, beat dead horses? And that is the question, isn’t it?

Why are Blumenthal and Murphy beating a dead horse, Trump, so soon before the soon to be ex-president is due to leave office? Purely as a practical matter, any conversation Trump has had with fellow Republicans concerning possible fraud in the 2020 presidential election is, most political watchers will agree, highly unlikely to overthrow the Biden election. Murphy and Blumenthal and the Courant reporter all agree on this point. Therefore, to characterize the call as “a real attack on democracy” is, some cooler heads may conclude, a bit overblown.

Here is Murphy in full stride in the Courant story:

“In a live Facebook conversation with constituents Monday evening, Murphy emphasized that President Trump and Republicans in Congress are behind ‘this attempt to overthrow democracy.’

“’It is not just a stain on American democracy but a body blow that could prove ultimately fatal,’ Murphy said, predicting fraudulent challenges to future elections may be successful.

“’’This will be the most significant attempt to end American democracy, to end the ability of voters to chose (sic) the President of the United States, in our nation’s history,’ Murphy said, noting that debate on Electoral College objections filed by Republicans will likely last though the night on Wednesday.”

After all his rhetorical huffing and puffing, Murphy subverts his own improbable claims. “It is not possible,’ he continues, “that Joe Biden is not going to be sworn in as president. This effort will fail. Joe Biden won this election and it wasn’t close. President Trump has tried to rob him of that mandate... The damage to our democracy is really serious.

“Voters have to remove from office people who hate democracy. We’ve got to run a campaign against these people.”

Well then, if it is “not possible that Joe Biden is not going to be sworn in as president,” and if the presumed effort to topple the pillars of the republic “will fail” – as indeed it will -- we then must conclude that this attempt to overthrow democracy in the United States is not a serious attempt to overthrow democracy in the United States.

The effort may be an attempt to: 1) acquire data in legal discovery proceedings to explore the fault lines of a faulty election process, or 2) to convince voters in Georgia not to deliver the U.S. Senate to Democrats in a contested runoff election. But all this is politics as usual, hardly a sinister or even serious effort to permanently damage small “r” republican government across the United States.

If the two U.S. Senators from Connecticut wish to denounce instances of democracy under attack by an overbearing chief executive, they might look closer to home.

Over the past 10 months, Governor Ned Lamont, with an assist from Coronavirus, has all but abolished two of the three branches of democratic government in Connecticut – the legislative and judicial branches – leaving him governing alone in the manner of Louis XIV, the “Sun King” of France best known for his quip, rendered in English – “I am the state.”  


Comments

Anonymous said…
Murphy is an inept clown and very little he says has any basis in fact.
Most all of the Junior Senators statements are simply to grandstand and never seems to accomplish anything for his constituency.

Clearly, Murphy tends to ride other Senators coattails than attempting to write legislation of his own and spends the majority of his time on Social Media badmouthing anything not in keeping with his party and spreading partisan propaganda to keep the Socialist Democratic faithful believing.

It is unfortunate that these same people have no idea that their actions or, for a better term inactions are allowing these inept incompetents free reign to completely destroy of our way of life and undermine our Constitution.

Perhaps someday the people of Connecticut will finally realize that these so called Public Servants are actually subversives working toward that destruction and the establishment of a Socialist/Communist state.
And its working, even our Governor has put himself above the Constitutional Law of the state and will no doubt be taking another six months of dictatorial power in February as no one seems to be interested in standing in his way.

Inaction, complacency, laziness, call it what you will but if we continue in this way we will completely lose any hope of bringing our state back to where it once was.
Forty five years of one party power has decimated this once great state and it continues its steady decline into oblivion.
Unknown said…
Spot on as usual Don.
Beware. when democrats accuse someone of misdeeds or corruption as least half of it is to try and cover up their lies, corruption and lawlessness.
The role these 2 reprobates played in the impeachment is disgraceful and deserves scorn.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p