Skip to main content

The Pivot, Blumenthal, Murphy and Trench Warfare

Schumer, Blumenthal, Murphy

It was bound to happen sooner or later. Now that former President Donald Trump has left office – peacefully, without summoning the military to insure his illegal re-installation to a second term – Connecticut Senators Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy have pivoted, which is to say they have pledged to be more responsible, if not more responsive to Trump’s populist backers across the country. There are lots of them, and it would be highly irresponsible and politically unwise to continue to bait them needlessly.

We are, since President Joe Biden was sworn into office in mid-January, in the midst of a tenuous unification project. At long last, we have a President, familiar with the ways of Congress, who has pledged to bring the country together again in unctuous harmony, entirely lacking during the two senators’ vigorous four year opposition to the Trump insurgency.

Then too, governing, rather than thoughtless and sometimes harmful blind resistance, has now become imperative. A Hartford Courant reporter puts it this way: “Now their adversary has departed for Mar-a-Lago and [sic] the two senators are confronting the new realities of governing in the post-Trump era. With a friend in the White House and a slim Democratic majority in the Senate, they face a long to-do list and big expectations.”

Some niggling impediments stand in the way of the unification of the country, one of which is a move by the unifiers to impeach Trump – again, even though the only punishment for impeachment is removal from office. Trump was effectively removed from office by a vote of electors on December 14, which should give pause to progressive Democrats who hope to eliminate the electoral college in favor of a popular presidential vote that would assure the domination of elections by large coastal population centers, an eventuality the founders of the nation had foreseen when they created the electoral college, a mechanism that distributes political power more equitably throughout the nation.

Also, some progressives have suggested packing the hitherto independent U.S. Supreme Court, the same body that curtly dismissed a Trump-favorable lawsuit brought by Texas. In an unsigned opinion, the high court declared that Texas had “not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections,” polite judicialize for “bug off.

Blumenthal reflexively voted against the nomination to the Supreme Court of Justice Neil Gorsuch, who later wrote a decision that anchored gay rights to the Constitution’s 14th Amendment.  The anti-Trump New York Times praised the Gorsuch ruling as “one of the most sweeping L.G.B.T. rights rulings in the court’s history.” In a Hartford Courant op-ed piece, Blumenthal wrote that his interrogation of Gorsuch left him with substantial doubt. 

Echoing Senator Edward Kennedy’s objections to the nomination of Judge Robert Bork, Blumenthal wrote, “That doubt leaves women wondering how long they will have autonomy over their health care decisions, same-sex couples questioning whether they might be denied the right to marry the person they love, workers and consumers doubting their rights, and Americans fearing the court will abandon protections of privacy, equality and the rule of law. That doubt is why I cannot support this nomination, and why I will work to block it using every tool at my disposal.” This statement, obviously incorrect, is still prominently displayed unamended on Blumenthal’s own senatorial site.

When one engages in partisan political trench warfare, one sometimes gets stuck in the trench.

The pivot from unyielding offense to uncritical defense may improve senators Blumenthal and Murphy’s disposition, but it is unlikely the pivot, however politically opportune, will similarly improve their ridged cast of minds and their sometimes ruinous policies.

This writer also has his doubts.

To take but one instance, the cancellation of the Keystone Pipeline, an appreciative nod to anti-fossil fuel environmental radicals, will further wreck the post-Covid US economy and tie the nation once again to oil suppliers such as Mafioso Vladimir Putin, who aspires to be the John D. Rockefeller of Russia. Unlike China, Putin has only two products in demand, oil and weaponry.

China, a Communist wolf in Communist clothing, steals proprietary intelligence from American businesses and universities and then relies on a cowed proletariat -- which soon will include once democratic Hong Kong -- to reproduce products at a lower cost than Western suppliers. When a monopoly is achieved on certain products – rare earth minerals, for instance – the knives come out and throats are cut.

One wonders whether friends of Israel such as Blumenthal and Murphy will willingly embrace Iran once again and ship to the mullahs at midnight, without Congressional approval, planeloads of ready cash that, some Iran watchers have insisted, was used to purchase the services of terrorists to push Israel into the sea. In foreign policy, is the Biden administration prepared to “move forward” past the Obama administration, or will the entire unification project become irreversibly stuck in the old trench?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...