Skip to main content

Fallen Angels

Bronin, Ritter, Blumethal, Murphy

Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont’s fishing buddy and political guru, has fallen from the starry heights. Months after receiving an Emmy award celebrating his communication skills, an alarming report by New York Attorney General Letitia James has put a dent in Cuomo’s halo.

Early in December 2020, Cuomo received the International Academy of Television Arts and Sciences Founders Award, “in recognition of his leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic and his masterful use of television to inform and calm people around the world.”

James' report found that Cuomo “may have put [nursing home] residents at increased risk of harm in some facilities and may have obscured the data available to assess that risk.”

The obscurantists had been very busy indeed. Pre-election reports had showed that upwards of 60 percent of all Coronavirus related deaths in New York and Connecticut had occurred in the state’s nursing homes. The new news from the Attorney General is that these earlier, pre-election reports from Cuomo’s administrators had “vastly undercounted” nursing home deaths.

“Using a sample of a few dozen nursing homes that revealed ­discrepancies between what those homes told investigators and what the state Department of Health told the rest of us,” The New York Post reported, “the AG’s office estimates the official death toll has been off by 55.4 percent.” That’s fifty-five-point-four percent, not a negligible rounding error.

Cuomo, never very creative in his excusifying, found a convenient scapegoat in former President Donald Trump, banned by Twitter from responding on its platform to Cuomo’s less than masterful use of television to inform and calm people around the world.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, James' counterpart, has not yet begun a similar investigation in a state where Coronavirus related death figures in nursing homes pattern those of New York.

People in New York were shocked by the new revelations. Across the border in Connecticut, seasoned politicians – U.S. Senators Blumenthal and Murphy, accompanied by Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin and President Pro Tem of the State Senate Matt Ritter – were SHOCKED to discover “that new statistics showed that 48% of in-person learners in the city schools are considered chronically absent,” according to a piece in the Harford Courant.”

Here’s betting two-to-one the reporters who wrote that story were not shocked by a statistic that might well have been officially produced shortly after the Coronavirus pandemic slammed into Connecticut via Cuomo’s New York. Any teacher in any failing Hartford public school easily could have reported the figure very early on, and that reporting might well have persuaded Democrat legislators, very early on, to support a move by Democrat Governor Lamont to open public schools to in-teacher learning.

It has been well known for some time that “science” supports Lamont’s fading ambition to open public schools. And it is also well known that Lamont has been opposed by the sustained effort of teacher union officials who, early in the Lamont administration, told the governor to take a flying leap when he suggested that some contractual terms inked during the Dannel Malloy administration should be revised so that an in-arrears multi-billion dollar pension debt might be slightly ameliorated.

The solution to union leadership intransigence is to end pension and salary negotiations between the executive department and unions. Allowing legislators unilaterally to decide both salaries and pensions would remove decision making on the spending of education dollars and debt resolution from the courts to the General Assembly, where such decisions properly and constitutionally belong.

Do the professional politicians named above who, in the glare of TV cameras, banged their heads together deciding precisely how to divvy up $405,730,706 million in federal funding slated for Hartford from the December stimulus package that was signed into law by then President Donald Trump really think that the incoming federal tax bonanza will substantially reduce the SHOCKING “48% of in-person learners in the city schools [who] are considered chronically absent”? Those students have now lost an irrecoverable one to two years of learning, and they will be the poorer for it – in every sense of the word. The summer school extensions proposed by Blumenthal, Murphy, Ritter and Bronin is little more than a bandage meant to cover a suppurating wound.

Will the four professional political problem solvers pledge, right now, to support Lamont’s valiant effort to open schools immediately in the face of implacable union leadership opposition? That is the only question worth deliberating. The federal dollars, one may be certain, will be shuttled to where they will be politically advantageous for ruling Democrats. The public good and the private good of politicians, we have learned from bitter experience, are not always the same.   

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e