The Country Mouse |
A Conversation With A
Radical Contrarian
A note to the City Mouse: You know Manny Pope, who calls himself a contrarian. My expurgated interview with him is below. I’d much appreciate your comments.
Q: People have called you a conservative, a rightest
Republican and so on, but you resist all these titles and consider yourself a
radical small “r” republican. Why so modest?
MP: Modesty is the key to understanding. We stand under
what we wish to understand, which means we look up modestly at the
transcendent truth. The truth is always above us – like Melville’s “inscrutable
blue sky,” like the stars in the firmament, like the God of our fathers. Politicians, especially in a constitutional
republic, are temporary nuisances. They come and go. They do not go quickly enough,
a failing of modern politics, but eventually, through inattention, arrogant
immodesty or old age, they disappear. A radical is one who goes to the root of
things.
Q: Like President Donald Trump?
MP: He is not a radical, and Trump has now vacated the White House,
disappointing the Associated Press, and
Connecticut’s two U.S. Senators, Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, who had
supposed he and his followers would be able to pull off an insurrectionary
coup.
Q: What do you make of Trump's administration?
MP: There will in the future be historians who argue
persuasively that he was a man more sinned against than sinning. No one in the
left of center media will pay the slightest attention to them. Trump will be
gone, but Trumpism? Presidents usually have some sort of honeymoon and after their administration ends, an afterglow. Trump had neither. Trump’s
biggest mistake, I believe, was his unrelenting attempt to write his own way
into history, alone and without assistance from the Associated Press.
But the immediate future now belongs to President-elect Joe Biden and a seriously compromised Democrat Party. So, enough about Trump.
Biden’s
political program may be justly described as post Woodrow Wilson progressive. Modern progressivism, inspired by
an outworn Marxism fetched by some third rate political thinkers from the
wastebin of history, is not radical, because modern progressives have never been interested in national roots. They are
interested, like Marx, in refashioning a future on quite different
foundations. And this cannot be done without uprooting constitutionalism and small "r" republican governance. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont,
who now styles himself falsely as a “democratic socialist,” has left his
imprint on both the Democrat Party platform and Biden’s plan to refashion
Republican Party foreign and domestic policy. He is the leftwing egocentric socialist Trump of the Democrat Party, he and Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, the “Dick the
Butcher” of the Democrat Party.
Q: But Biden has been described by most as a moderate
Democrat.
MP:
Q: This administrative governing apparatus is what Trump
calls “the swamp.”
MP: Yes, he got that right. The shift from representative
government to government by bureaucracy has been underway for a long while. It
has succeeded because opposition to it has come from a disorganized and
bewildered public. There is not a single editorial board in the nation that
does not believe that an enlightened national polity can best be effected by
enlightened newspaper editors. Bill Buckley used to say he’d rather be governed
by the first hundred people picked at random from the phonebook than the Harvard
Law faculty. Rule by the experts is profoundly anti-republican and
anti-democratic. An administrative monarchy is no less offensive to small “r”
republican government than the monarchy rejected by the founders of our
constitutional government.
Q: What else did Trump get right?
MP: If I may satirically borrow a phrase from Sanders, Trump spoke softly to “European Socialist” Vladimir Putin of Russia, Fascist dictator of China Xi Jinping, and celestial ruler of North Korea Kim Jong-un – but he carried a big stick in the form of a beefed up U.S. military.
The President under whom Biden served as Vice President, Barack Obama, considerably reduced the U.S. military stick, sent planeloads of cash to the mullahs of Iran, sent his campaign operatives into Israel to aid Benjamin Netanyahu’s political opponent, and favored a "lead from behind" posture in a war theatre that resulted in the takeover by ISIS of parts of Syria, northern Iran and the horn of Africa – by any measure, a failed foreign policy. Trump sent defensive missiles to Ukraine, following Putin’s successful annexation of Crimea, moved the American Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, slapped damaging trade restrictions on Iran, Putin’s Mideast client state, induced important Arab states to recognize Israel, the only democracy in the region, frustrated Putin’s ambition to become the chief oil producer to Europe and the Middle East, made the US a net independent energy supplier, and successfully rebuffed the unrelenting efforts of a previous administration to demonstrate that Trump had – improbably (see above) – colluded with Putin in a traitorous deal to deny the presidency to Hillary Clinton. Assuming everything said by Democrats about Putin is true, does it make any sense to aid Putin by systemically destroying the independent energy industry in the United States? In any case, Trump is gone. His legacy rests now with his enemies among a) the Obama-Biden-Clinton administration, b) Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and c) tendentious members of what Trump used to call contemptuously “the fake media.”
Q: And how will that work out?
MP: In the short or long term?
Q: Both.
MP: In the short term, Trump’s legacy, defined always in the most tendentious terms, will
be – please forgive the Medieval hyperbole – drawn and quartered by the legacy
media he had so imprudently defamed, and Republicans who had not denounced him
before the recent riotous activity at the national Capitol will suffer the same
fate. Trump now belongs to history. In the long term, historians will try, some
successfully, others not, to put some real flesh on the dry bones of the media’s
first, sometimes partisan and tendentious, snapshot of history.
Comments