Skip to main content

Connecticut The Un-Constitution State, And The Way Forward


A vote by the Electoral College on December 14 settled the question: Who will occupy the White House in January? The occupants will be President Joe  Biden and President-in-Waiting Vice President Kamala Harris.

Other questions also have been settled. Since Trump is in the process of being supplanted, the thorny question often asked of Republicans in Connecticut during the presidential campaign – “Why have you not yet condemned the usurper Trump, and when do you plan to do so?” – are now moot. Connecticut Republicans no longer will be compelled to denounce the titular head of the Republican Party who, be it noted, beefed up President Barack Obama's flagging military, introduced the Supreme Court to rational reading of the Constitution by means of three new appointments, moved the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, moved some Arab states closer to Israel, greatly disappointing Iran, a leading exporter of terrorism in the Middle East, assassinated Islamic terrorist Qasem Soleimani , pretty much the same way President Barack Obama before him assassinated Osama bin Laden, and  hastened the production of a vaccine for Coronavirus, which the president modestly did not insist should be named after him – “The Trump Vaccine.”

During the 2020 elections, Connecticut Republicans managed successfully to duck behind “moderate” flower pots, without mentioning the points indicated above, and their silence, when the subject was broached by state Democrats, spoke volumes. In law and politics, silence signifies assent -- also debilitating cowardice. Republicans mourning their losses in the General Assembly needn’t wonder why many Republicans and many traditional Democrats turned tail on them during the 2020 elections.

Some open questions relating to Coronavirus have now been closed. Humans are learning and adaptable animals. The pandemic has been with us now for about nine months, during which period of time the members of Connecticut’s General Assembly remained in their bunkers, and Governor Ned Lamont was adorned by no-show legislators, a vast majority of whom were Democrats, with plenary powers not seen in Connecticut since its last colonial governor, William Pitkin,  gave up the ghost in East Hartford.

Following the Constitutional Convention, American revolutionaries divided the government into three separate but, within their own spheres, co-equal branches of government – legislative, executive and judiciary – each of which was to stand as a firewall preventing a resumption of autocratic government.

A glance at the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch page shows the debilitating effect of the breakdown in constitutional governance within the state’s judiciary. Virtual Justice is no justice. A General Assembly that does not meet as a deliberative body at an appointed spot to discuss and vote on measures affecting the public weal is not a legislature.  And legislation promulgated by Lamont is, by definition, unconstitutional. The state legislature is NEVER justified in renting its constitutional prerogatives to any governor, Democrat or Republican, who then rents out a usurped legislative authority to unelected sectors of the administrative state.

If the State Supreme Court, most of whose members were appointed by former Governor Dannel Malloy, cannot rule intelligently and authoritatively on such constitutional questions, while leaving in the public mind no doubt that our essential constitutional liberties are not to be put at auction, it would be better if the state’s judicial branch, now severed from the trunk of liberty, were to remain in permanent hibernation.  

Recent changes in the constitutional architecture of the state and nation, hearkening back to pre-revolutionary days, are not merely academic questions, but practical assaults on imprescriptible liberties affirmed by state and federal constitutions. And it should not take a declaration of bankruptcy to move academic institutions in the state such as Yale and UConn to protest the retrogression.

Nearly a year after Coronavirus arrived in the United States from China, we know: 1) that the science of Coronavirus was never a “science” in the true sense of the word; 2) that political prescriptions to end the pandemic have not ended the pandemic because such prescriptions – mask wearing, forced isolation, widespread testing, the closing of businesses and schools in Connecticut -- were prophylactics only and not curative measures; 3) that a preponderance of Coronavirus related deaths in Connecticut and the northeast occurred in nursing homes ill prepared to handle the pandemic; 4) that Coronavirus political prescriptions and the state’s sinking economy are inseparably connected; and 5) that herd immunity created by the swift distribution of various vaccines is curative and, as yet, highly experimental, because the vaccines producers have leap-frogged over animal experimentation.

Lamont, out-rigged with extraordinary pre-constitutional powers, has yet to include state representatives in the General Assembly among other “necessary” state workers that will be among the first to receive the new vaccines. Vaccinated, members of the General Assembly and the Judicial Departments may quickly resume their constitutional duties and recover from King Ned their constitutional obligations.

It was Thomas Paine, one of the archangels of the American Revolution, who said, “Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it.” Paine also warned, “Character is much easier kept than recovered.” Once lost, the character of the American Republic, intimately bound up with the doctrine of the separation of powers – legislative, judicial and executive – cannot be easily restored. In a state in which everything has been turned on its head, the way forward is the way back to sanity and constitutional governance.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...