Skip to main content

A Modest Proposal: Shut Down Representative Government In Connecticut Permanently

The City Mouse

The City Mouse and I had a long discussion at the Four Star Diner in East Hartford concerning Connecticut’s future prospects. The name of the diner has here been changed to protect all concerned against possible political recriminations.

Asked how he would determine the extent of censorship in Europe, Voltaire said the depth of censorship can be plumbed by posing the question: What cannot be written or said? Here in Connecticut, there is much left unprinted in the state’s left-leaning media, she insisted.

“Such as what?” I asked.

“Well, a couple of days ago, Governor Ned Lamont adjusted his air travel ban. The ban was installed to prevent Coronavirus seepage into Connecticut from states that met a certain testing threshold, which you have said, in one of your unprinted columns, may have been set too low by ‘scientists.’ Like the weather, Coronavirus prognostications change rather quickly here in ‘the land of steady habits.’

“Presently, all air traffic is subject to regulations that make air travel unlikely, if not impossible. The withering hand of state government, having ruined Thanksgiving, has now moved on to Christmas. But Lamont has carved out some exceptions to his travel killing regulations. He has exempted New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island. Connecticut’s incurious media has not asked him, to my knowledge, upon what firm principle the exceptions rest, but some of his critics surmise they rest upon a compact between these three states details which have never been disclosed. One Republican, a naughty conservative, has suggested that Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York has been exempted because he is Lamont’s ‘fishing buddy.’ All three governors are Democrats.”

She asked what role I thought the new vaccines might play in the restoration of Connecticut’s crumbling economy, a very important, little discussed question.

“The vaccines, along with the change in national government, should cause Democrats nationally to pivot, both practically and rhetorically.”

She saw little sign of rhetorical pivoting. President-elect Joe Biden’s cabinet choices were not, to her way of thinking, reassuring -- a submissive bow to intersectionality and far too progressive. The attack on President Donald Trump has not abated, and we appear to have elected a question mark as president.

“Sure, but it takes a long time to turn around a forward rushing locomotive. A rhetorically committed media is very slow in adapting to new arrangements, which very well might include the capture not only of the White House, but also the U.S. Senate. Democrats already control the U.S. House by a margin more slender after than before the 2020 elections. If that happens, the nation will find itself with a governmental architecture very much like that of Connecticut. Democrats in Connecticut command pretty much the entire government, the executive, legislative and judicial branches, as well as all the Constitutional offices and the U.S. Congressional Delegation, an engine of leftwing ambitions.”

“Right,” she observed. “But in Connecticut the distribution of political power, which appears to be the Democrats’ sole concern, hardly matters at all, because all government power for the last eight months has been exercised by a plenary chief executive, Lamont, who has been taking his governing cues from Cuomo, his fishing buddy. It is no accident that Lamont has exempted New York from his stringent travel restrictions. God, the old saw has it, does not play dice with the universe, but here we see Lamont playing dice with Connecticut. The Chinese Coronavirus may have wended its way to Connecticut from New York. Other Coronavirus tributaries likely were New Jersey and Rhode Island. Does it make any sense to seal the Coronavirus bucket by means of travel restrictions while punching three holes in its bottom so that the virus, lethal mostly to those in nursing homes left unattended by restriction prone governors, may freely flow into Connecticut from contiguous states?”

She further pointed out that no plans are afoot to provide incoming vaccines to members of the legislative and judicial branches – because for eight months these two co-equal branches of Connecticut’s government have been considered unnecessary.

And we know that the Republican Party has been considered unnecessary by ruling Democrats for, just to reach for a round number, approximately a half century in virtually all the state’s major cities, where General Assembly talk is cheap and performance poor. We are told by Connecticut’s media, chronically unable to connect dots, that cities represented by Connecticut Democrats are nearly incapable of producing literate high school seniors, before they graduate to colleges where their professors will ply them with remedial courses and then dump them on urban mean streets to search for non-existent jobs.

In matters of cultural deprivation, there is, by the City Mouse’s count, only one commentator in the entire state who has managed to weave these disturbing narratives into his commentary – Chris Powell, formerly the manager of the Journal Inquirer, now retired, though he continues in his columns to pepper the state with intelligent commentary, without raising so much as an eyebrow in Connecticut's quiescent, Democrat dominated General Assembly.

“Here’s an idea: Connecticut’s tax prone, expensive government has been boarded up for nearly a year. Perhaps we should shut it down permanently and appoint a conservator for our bankrupt state – NOT Cuomo. Shall we ask the waitress?”

And the waitress said – sure, it might save some money and reduce Connecticut’s political migraine. Would she consent to serve as conservator?

“Sure, no telling how long this place will remain in business anyway.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p