Skip to main content

Gobble, Gobble


Like most turkeys, the new Democratic-Rell budget will be gobbling a lot of money. But not to worry, said Senate Majority Leader Martin Looney, from the Democratic Republic of New Haven, the new “millionaire’s tax” has become “the centerpiece of Democratic tax policy for this whole decade.”

The state’s precarious budget is put together with revenue engines that melt like popsicles after a few years, after which the vanishing one-time revenues will bring us all back to square one: The present Democratic-Rell budget borrows $1.3 billion, drains the rainy day fund of $1.5 billion, and looks forward nervously to the receipt of $1.5 billion in narrowly targeted federal stimulus money – no way to run a $17 billion dollar a year business. And, oh yes, the state is looking square in the eye of a $9 billion future deficit.

Happy days are here again.

Just as on the style runway red is sometimes the new black, Loony’s new progressive income tax is the new income tax; and all of us know what happened with the old income tax.

Following passage of the Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Income Tax, the state realized a number of successive surpluses, which might have signaled to a less looney legislature that the tax had been pegged too high. But the good turkeys gobbled it all up.

And as a direct result of all this gobbling, here we are: another day older and deeper in debt.

But no wiser.

The difference between Democrats and some more conservative Republicans on budget issues is not an ideological difference: It is a difference in competing realities, as may be seen by Republican leader John McKinney’s assessment of the Democratic-Rell budget: “I don't think we have to wait two years. In three to six months, we will be back. Two years from now, we will have a deficit of $2.5 billion to $4.5 billion in 2012 alone. If you don't have the rainy-day fund and stimulus, you've taken away the two largest chunks of dollars to solve this budget crisis.”

On the one hand, looniness; on the other, a cold rational assessment of the future.

Comments

mccommas said…
Evacuate!
Evacuate!
Every millionare for himself!

I am taking my treasure to Florida. And you?

What state are you going to flee to?
Don Pesci said…
Only the millionaires will be able to leave the state. But I must say I envy recent graduates from UConn who upon graduation take their sheepskins to less tax punishing states. After a guy called Budd ruined Travelers Insurance Company, my brother hi-tailed it for South Carolina. While in Arizona, my wife’s uncle said he would build us a house there if we would move. He was a small contractor in CT who got out while the getting was good. But we decided to stay. Someone has to record the rise and fall of Connecticut. Why not me?
mccommas said…
The getting is still good from what I can tell. My partner has a great job. That is the only reason why we stay.

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e