Skip to main content

Freedom Of Speech

Ezra Levant defends his decision to print cartoons before agents of the state.

His response to interrogatories by the Alberta Human Rights Commission should be shown in every journalism class in the (as yet) free West:

Video 1, Video 2, Video 3

The entire interview may be found here.

Ezra Levant's site may be found here.

A full account of these incidents from a moderate Muslim perspective may be fond here.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Canada: Freedom of Speech succumbing to Kangaroo Courts of the Human Rights Commission

Proceedings against Ezra Levant are nothing short of ridiculous, but let's consider the implications for moderate Muslims. This "investigation" will further divide Muslims and non-Muslims in Canada. It will give credence to radicals' claims that the West is at war with Islam. It will antagonize non-Muslims and moderate Muslims will be pushed towards radicalization. Regardless of the outcome, once again Islamists skillfully manipulated Dhimmi justice system and came out as clear winners. Thank you, Human Right Commission!
10:17 PM
Don Pesci said…
Sadly, I agree with you. But government agents of this kind must be resisted at all costs, at the risk of losing our hard won liberties. I do not think people are so dull as to be unable to make proper distinctions between violent and deceptive jihadists and moderate Muslims. But it is very important for moderate Muslims to oppose what they should oppose whenever possible. This is a very hard case for moderate Muslims to oppose, because Mohammed is held in special reverence by them and one always resents an attack on what one holds dear. But there are plenty of occasions for opposition to those who violate the laws of God and the nature of man. As for winning – the jihadists have shown in places like Anbar that they lose permanently when they win temporarily. There is something in a man that rebels against unjust oppression, some untouched part of his soul that will not accept humility and disgrace; I’m betting on that.
9:07 AM
Anonymous said…
"I do not think people are so dull as to be unable to make proper distinctions between violent and deceptive jihadists and moderate Muslims."

You'd be surprised how many people don't want to see the difference. The idea that all Muslims are the same seems to unite right-wing nutjobs and loony left.

"But it is very important for moderate Muslims to oppose what they should oppose whenever possible."

It is, but not too many people want to hear what we have to say.

"As for winning – the jihadists have shown in places like Anbar that they lose permanently when they win temporarily."

Militarity, Jihadists are nothing (Anbar). Politically, they are very formidable (Ezra's case).
12:37 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."
17 comments
Read more

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e
Post a Comment
Read more