Skip to main content

Zell’s a Hoot

Sam Zell has just purchased a large chunk of the Times Mirror empire, the Tribune company, and is threatening to make The Hartford Courant profitable. Ordinarily, commentators at the liberal Courant, once a cog in the wheel of Times Mirror, are suspicious of profits, usually earned by grasping billionaires who relish grinding the faces of the poor. But hard times in the news business have convinced even the most aggressive amature Naom Chomskyites that as their profits go, so go their paychecks.

So, the folk down there at the Courant – and other information outposts attached to the paper by media umbilical cords – are understandably anxious.

Zell, dressed in his signature cowboy boots, addressed these nervous nellies at the Bushnell Memorial, and the day after his address, all present were attempting to decipher his oracular pronouncements.

What, for example, can be read into those cowboy boots? Of late, especially in the European press whose fertile ground Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr. is busy tilling, cowboys have been somewhat spat upon, perhaps because most of Europe lies quaking under the crescent sword of Islam and President Bush is seen on this side of the ocean as the world's most reviled cowboy-in-chief.

According to a write-up in the Courant – now “owned,” sort of, by the employees – Zell “offered few specifics on what's in store for The Courant's readers and employees. That, in fact, was part of his point.

“Under Zell, after a leveraged buyout that leaves the company with $13 billion in debt, The Courant, WTIC-TV, Channel 61, and other Tribune businesses will fall under far less control from headquarters in Chicago, he said.”

So, a loosening of the reins is in the stars.

"Going forward,” Zell said, “by definition, there will be a lot of changes. I do not believe that anybody can grow a business by reducing the number of employees. It is not our game plan to, in effect, try and figure out how few people we can have run this business. The focus of everything that we're going to do is directed at one thing: generating more revenue."

Zell’s key lieutenant Randy Michaels, who oversees interactive publishing, broadcasting and most of the newspapers owned by Tribune, told the group that necessary change would involve a fundamental modification in business approach. The new news business would become "a 24-hour online interactive business that publishes once a day for the record."

When layoffs were broached, Zell lapsed into oracular metaphor: “A year from now, it's very likely there will be more people, but with different deck chairs.”

Ordinarily, if business is down, one attempts to capture a part of the market that has not been addresses in the business plan. In Connecticut, unfortunately, the interests of more conseravtive readers are not being addresses in the media. Zell, from what may be deduced from the Courant report, wants reporters to concentrate on the internet format for daily news and then republish newspaper stories in a more extensive and deeper format in the paper. But if the content is the same – which is to say, if the paper does nor reach out to readers it is not satisfying now – its readership will remain the same. To put it bluntly, the paper need to rethink who is sitting in those “chairs” that Zell wants to replace.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Having dropped my Courant subscription a year ago (and getting the NY Post for hoots, one can't pay enough for headlines like "Ike beats Tina to Death" while reading the WSJ at the office) I had a chance to revisit the Courant while a neighbor was on vacation.

The lack of local news was astonishing as was the overall dreariness of the coverage. The front page alone was all doom and gloom and strict aunt nanny-ism. A murder had occurred in an upscale Stamford hotel and the Courant had to use an AP story!

By any standard of newspaper quality it failed, let alone the new media standard.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p