Skip to main content

A Short Brief Against Blumenthal

Blumenthal and Hillary -- DennisHouse TV

U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal has been in the public eye in Connecticut for thirty seven years, and there are signs that the public eye is weary and wary of him.

Blumenthal’s approval ratings, like those of President Joe Biden, have softened. In many ways, Connecticut’s senior U.S. Senator is tied inescapably to Biden short coattails by his affirming and negative votes in the Senate and his long standing cordial relations with the President, former President Barack Obama, former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State in the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton.

Republican Party challengers in the past, some tougher and more resilient than had been supposed by Connecticut’s left of center media, had effectively played on that particular organ stop – Blumenthal’s long standing friendships with power brokers in his party. He went to Yale with both Clintons, and his relationship with Biden has been amorous and only a touch less critical than that of the average Connecticut political commentator.

Blumenthal was silent when Biden turned the keys of Afghanistan over to Taliban terrorists; silent when Biden assured temperamental Americans that citizens of the United States abandoned in Afghanistan would  swiftly return home safely; silent when, reversing former President Donald Trump’s largely successful southern border policies, citizens of numerous foreign nations poured through a poorly defended open border, skirting the usual immigrant processing protocols; silent when Biden pledged to shut down fossil fuel production in the United States – “You can count on it!”; silent when Biden falsely claimed that he had inflation on the run; and unavailable for press availabilities when  the family members of two assassinated police officers in Bristol, Connecticut announced that funeral orations by  Governor Ned Lamont would not be permitted, possibly because Lamont had earlier signed into law a bill that had eliminated partial immunity for police officers, a measure that needlessly exposes their personal assets to legal seizure.

Blumenthal has never been questioned closely by Connecticut’s reporters concerning Hunter Biden’s corrupt “business relationships” with Chinese Communist officials whose ambition it is to replace the United States as a leading world power – and not only in the Far East. No contrarian reporter has publically confronted Blumenthal during his frequent media availabilities in the state to ask whether he would care to comment on reliable but compromising documentation recovered from Hunter’s laptop. Some of that documentation would appear to implicate President Biden in his son’s wayward and remunerative secret business relationships with hostile foreign agents in China, Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.

Whenever the Democrat entourage has set down in Connecticut to squeeze campaign contributions from Gold Coast millionaires, prominent Democrat visitors to the state have rarely been asked critical questions by Connecticut’s media, a good part of which is heavily invested in the success of Connecticut’s Democrat Party political hegemony.

After all, you cannot do business with out of power Republicans, and Connecticut’s media has long operated on the principle that Joseph Pulitzer, after whom the Pulitzer Prize in journalism is named, was all wet when he said that a good newspaper “should have no friends.”  William Randolph Hearst made the same point more vigorously: “News is what people don't want you to print. Everything else is ads.”

The Democrat Party in Connecticut has ruled the roost for decades. All the members of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation are Democrats, the last “fiscally conservative, socially liberal” Republican Congressman, Chis Shays, having been purged more than 13 years ago after having served 22 years in Washington D.C. Democrats boast of a near veto proof majority in the General Assembly. Connecticut’s last two governors have been Democrats. All the Constitutional offices in Connecticut are held by Democrats. Connecticut’s largest crumbling cities have for nearly half a century been ruled by rusting Democrat Party machines barely distinguishable from Tammany Hall.

A friend on the vanishing liberal side of the political barricades tells me that the state is swimming in a sea of ambiguity and uncertainty. Over the past decade, liberals have been supplanted by Marxist tinged progressives. But one thing is not ambiguous, not uncertain: We have the state we have, swimming in debt, gnawing its fingers in quiet desperation, because we cling uncritically to the politicians we have, and the state’s media has abandoned its primary (pun intended) mission – to say the truth and shame the devil. 

Comments

Unknown said…
Sad to say and a ongoing tragedy for Connecticut and the nation, you are exactly right about Connecticut being the land of steady bad voting habits.

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e