Skip to main content

A Common Sense Guide For The Politically Perplexed, Part 3

Lamont to DeLauro's right -- CTPost

Connecticut’s Democrat Party Hegemony

On the Sunday following the conclusion of the off year elections in Connecticut, Chris Keating of the Hartford Courant raised the following question: How did Dems do so well in state?

The short answer to the question is: The Democrat Party hegemony won because hegemonies most often win. The more interesting and illuminating questions are: How did Connecticut become a one party state? When did the erosion of competitive politics begin? And is there a turning point at which formerly Republican strongholds in the state – Greenwich and West Hartford come to mind – will revitalize Republican Party ranks?

The extent of the Democrat Party hegemony was most accurately depicted by Dr. Eric Ostermeier in a short piece, Connecticut Democrats Set New US House Electoral Record, that appeared in in Smart Politics five days after polls closed in Connecticut. 

“Since 2008,” Ostermeier wrote, “Democrats [in Connecticut] have now won 40 consecutive U.S. House elections, not only adding to their party record but also setting a new record in the Nutmeg State for the longest partisan winning streak for the office since the founding of the modern two-party system in 1828.”

Journal Inquirer columnist Chris Powell struck a sour note following Connecticut elections in his column, Can competition in politics ever return to Connecticut?

However sour, the note rings true alarm bells: “Governor Lamont and the renewed Democratic majority in the General Assembly have won a great mandate that will feed desires for more government programs that only employ more Democrats, erode the private sector, and make more people dependent on government.”

Whether it will be possible for Lamont to strap himself to a “moderate” main mast and, like Odysseus, stuff his ears with wax to silence the bewitching song of progressive sirens in his state remains a doubtful but still open question.

Not even former Governor Lowell Weicker, the father of Connecticut’s income tax, was able to curb the progressive Democrat appetite for improvident spending. At the present time, Connecticut’s often scratched spending itch has increased its state budget from $7.5 billion when Weicker first assumed office in 1991 to $24.2 billion today – not that anyone is counting. And the state’s indebtedness is among the largest and most debilitating in the country at $79.5 billion. Even Weicker knew that improvident spending fuels inflationary fires – not that millionaires in the state clustered in Connecticut’s “Gold Coast” need worry overmuch about state taxes and spending.

Rather than cry over spilled milk, let us attempt here to address one of above important questions.

How did Connecticut become a one party state?

The slow and agonizing destruction of Connecticut’s Republican Party through gradual attrition began long before 2008. At the risk of disappointing half-baked “moderate” Republicans – i.e. GOP’ers who have long claimed to be “fiscal conservatives” but “liberals” on social matters – this writer has more than once pointed out that such an artificial division between economics and culture is a fraudulent dichotomy, useful chiefly for campaign purposes. Politics is downstream from culture, and the way to change politics, postmodern Marxists such as Antonio Gramsci (read the link, will’ya?) have rightly pointed out, is first to -- change the culture.

Connecticut is now “the abortion state,” “the casino state,” “the pot state,” “the deficit state,” the “repeal the second amendment” state, the “who needs energy?” state, the “rule by executive fiat” state, the “I’m aboard, tow up the lifeline” state, the “crumbling large cities” state, full of empathetic, wall-eyed Democrat politicians who genuinely feel that the best way to help the struggling poor in Connecticut’s state-dependent cities is, first and foremost, to help themselves to large gobs of middle class taxes so that, when the recession promised by progressive Democrats finally washes up on Connecticut shores, state government, its lips firmly fixed on a withered middle class tax teat, will survive the battering in good order.

Weicker, the progenitor of Connecticut’s continually expanding state taxes, who once referred to himself as “the turd in the Republican Party punch bowl,” noted little of this in his ghost written biography, “Maverick,” an oversight perhaps.

An answer to yet another pressing question – To what extent is Connecticut’s non-contrarian media responsible for the state’s dominant, progressive, status quo hegemony? – must await further status quo non-developments.

Democracy in Connecticut

In the meanwhile, we may all rejoice that Democrat democracy, somewhat different from Republican democracy, has in our state survived the presumed depredations of former President Donald Trump, largely because Connecticut Democrats have artfully used Trump as a foil in their campaigns, even though the former president has been politically unplugged and out of office for the past two years. And the insistence of Connecticut Democrats that a Republican governor may overthrow a statute that affirms Roe v Wade is preposterous, given that The Supreme Court’s most recent decision affirmed and strengthened the right of states to regulate abortions.  

In a one party state, right reason, when it does not conform to a party line, is easily – even gratefully – overthrown by an agitprop state apparat and an army of enablers.

Comments

Unknown said…
BRAVO !!! Another brilliant piece. Sad and a nightmare for the beleaguered Conservatives and Republicans that will only find their solace in a southern state.

Marty

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...

Maureen Dowd vs Chris Murphy

  Maureen Dowd, a longtime New York Times columnist who never has been over friendly to Donald Trump, was interviewed recently by Bill Maher, and she laid down the law, so to speak, to the Democrat Party.   In the course of a discussion with Maher on the recently released movie Snow White, “New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd declared Democrats are ‘in a coma’ while giving a blunt diagnosis of the party she argued had become off-putting to voters,” Fox News reported.   The Democrats, Dowd said, stopped "paying attention" to the long term political realignment of the working class. "Also,” she added, “they just stopped being any fun. I mean, they made everyone feel that everything they said and did, and every word was wrong, and people don't want to live like that, feeling that everything they do is wrong."   "Do you think we're over that era?" Maher asked.   “No," Dowd answered. "I think Democrats are just in a coma. Th...