Skip to main content

Politicians And The Memory Hole


“One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic”
-- Joseph Stalin

The memory hole is deepening to such a point that Democrats, especially mayors-for-life who have been in charge of major cities for about a half century, are having difficulty in remembering yesterday.

It seems only yesterday that Randell Tarez Jones, a three year old child, was gunned down in Hartford by a 19 year old who hadn’t bothered to attend closely to the imprecations of U.S. Senators Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy on the dangers of “assault weapons.”

Here’s betting that the 19 year old did not purchase his weapon at a gun show, nor did the weapon fire itself. The shooter fired it inadvertently, the media helpfully reported, killing the 3 year old, the wrong target.

The shooter’s intended target was a man sitting in the passenger seat who, once the firing had started, managed to dive out the driver’s window, scurrying over the driver, a mother of three children, all present and accounted for in the car. When the bullets, likely not purchased by the shooter at a gun show, stopped flying, the three year old child, driven to the hospital by the mother, expired.

This writer predicted at the time that it would take politicians who turned up to commiserate with stricken family members – Blumenthal, known to show up, as he said, “at garage door openings,” appeared to be absent without a by-your-leave -- only a few hours to forget the child’s name: “A 29 year-old woman, walking her dog a few blocks from the murder scene, was asked by a reporter to comment. ‘I was raised in this neighborhood,’ she said, ‘It’s always been kind of a thing, especially when the weather starts to warm up. It’s kind of expected.’”

Rain on Wednesday, sunshine on Thursday, murders happen. Such untidy murders are expected in Connecticut’s large cities, but not, say, in Greenwich, Connecticut, home to taxable millionaires.

Why are murders expected in Hartford, even among the potential victims of murder, but not in Greenwich, where the streets are, euphemistically speaking, paved with gold? More importantly, what are politicians in the General Assembly prepared to do to reduce expected murders in Connecticut’s large cities now that Coronavirus, a too convenient scaffold upon which our moral indifference hangs, appears to be hobbling off the front pages of Connecticut’s press?

Why is a single death in Greenwich a tragedy, while a single death in Hartford is a statistic?

It cannot be so because there is no one to mourn the victim. Hartford is crowded with mourners. Attending a religious service in the north end of Hartford, one bumps into victims of crime everywhere. A recent story in a Hartford paper unscrolled the statistics. People who tend to nod off when statistics are displayed before them need go no further than the story’s headline: “Hartford is on pace for one of its deadliest years in decades, with 20 murders halfway through 2021 as violent crime rises nationwide.”

We are prepared to forget that there has been a murder, there has been a victim, there has been a crime, even before the crime has been committed, before the body is buried, before the criminal is apprehended, before he is charged, before he is convicted, before he is sentenced, because – such things are to be expected, so long as we do not wish to attack, or even discuss, the causes of post-fatherless urban crime.

And when we are slapped in the face by the murder of a three year old child, still we do not awaken. We add the child to a growing list of statistics. We resume our daily lives, hoping for a better tomorrow. We tell ourselves, if we are politicians, there is “still much work to be done,” the clear implication being that all the wounds will close of themselves, that one day, magically, murders – which crop up in cities mysteriously, like mushrooms after a moist morning -- will of themselves disappear. Why bestir ourselves? We need do nothing but wait patiently for the anarchy in our cities to disappear; maybe sprinkle the blood in the streets with more money or, better, douse the anarchic flames in 19 year old African American boys, many of them fatherless, with copious tears of compassion.

In fact, the anarchy in our cities – not to worry too much; crime everywhere in our tragic, post-modern world is on the uptick -- is the third rail of Connecticut politics. We are more comfortable with statistics than murders in our cities because, as Joseph Stalin said, “One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...