Skip to main content

Lamont And His Party’s Left Wing

Lamont, Biden and Hayes

On some issues – the speculative impact of fossil fuels on the environment, for instance – Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont is sitting in the same ideological pew as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Leon Trotsky of progressives in New England, and socialists bawling from the rooftops such as Vermont  Senator Bernie Sanders, who has not had an original thought since his college days in the silly sixties, when it was considered cool politically to brush cheeks with the Ortega brothers in Nicaragua (Pronounced on college campuses of the day Knee-Ka-RRRRAG-WA) or the Castro brothers in Cuba (Pronounced KU-BA).

Lamont is a wealthy millionaire, with a well-appointed family homestead in Maine to which he might retire from a state in the process of conforming to the now possible impossible dreams of quixotic, memory defective progressives.

Lamont, like all good Democrats, is also a faithful camp follower; so is Dick Blumenthal, husband of the daughter of a rich New York landlord who owns, among other properties, the Empire State building. It helps, when you are in politics, to marry well.

Lamont has resisted taxes levied on the rich and some business taxes. But, fearful of progressive kick-back, he has not cleared his throat on the more important question of state spending. Most of us in the middle and lower orders know that spending and taxation are two faces of the same coin. And the two faces are casually connected. The more you get, the more you spend; the more you spend the better you feel; so eat entrepreneurial capital at every meal. And never mind that small and midsized entrepreneurs, whose profit line falls short of that of Warren Buffet or Lowell Weicker, father of Connecticut’s income tax,  or Dick Blumenthal, who married well,  need their capital more than rich politicians living the good life with second and third homes and, in Weicker’s case, second and third wives.

State spending is, quite literally, the pink elephant in Connecticut’s Democrat dominated political house. Progressives in the state’s General Assembly have managed over the years to redefine taxation and spending – the same coin, remember – as “investments.” Progressives regard all investments by the state as unquestionably good, even when they are bad investments. Lamont’s wife, a hedge fund investor, knows a good money deal when she sees one, unlike most politicians. And deep-pocket capitalist investors who continue to support a new-model progressive Democrat Party through generous campaign donations rather hope that the Governor is attentive to her pillow talk.

Faced with a resurgent progressivism, Lamont finds himself walking barefoot on a razor’s edge. Progressives want to remake Connecticut’s tax structure so that the rich will finally pay their “fair share,” before moving abruptly to other more tax friendly states.

Facing a recession caused in part by autocratic governors who have closed businesses in response to a now disappearing Coronavirus infestation, President Joe Biden, the nominal head of the national Democrat Party, put the kibosh on a Keystone pipeline that might have safely delivered low cost, natural gas to the country’s breadbasket. At the same time, the increasingly progressive Biden administration has, through a wrong-headed foreign policy borrowed from the Obama administration, given the nod to a Russian pipeline that now will deliver energy to much of central Europe.

The Biden administration opened a semipermeable border to illegal immigrants, and is now in the process of sharing hordes of border busters with other than Border States. Connecticut signaled some months ago it would be willing to accept its “fair share” of illegal immigrants.

While Border States wince under the lash of illegal immigration, Vice-President-In-Charge-Of-Borders Kamala Harris has just returned from a good will tour of Honduras, (Guatemala and Mexico), where she likely discussed with the chief executives of all three countries, behind doors closed to an inquisitive media, how many dollars in foreign aid they would need to contain the overflow of illegal immigrants to the United States caused by her boss.

And, oh yes, when Biden decided to complete former President Donald Trump’s ambitious goal of bringing all American troops home from Afghanistan, Mayor of Hartford Luke Bronin cheerfully offered to make room in Connecticut’s Capital City for Afghan troops, friends of the departing Americans, now candidates for extermination by the Taliban.

Somewhere in these messy political non-solutions to pressing problems there are themes that might be exploited by campaign savvy Republicans to change the political configuration of both national and state governments. Now that both Trump and Coronavirus are disappearing from the front pages of most newspapers, the empty news space has to be filled with something – perhaps nonpartisan news. Presidential honeymoons, we know, do not last forever.

Lamont and leftists in his party are divided on a perilous economic point. Democrat Party leftists, both nationally and in Connecticut are extreme Keynesians who believe that government need never confront its debt because the national debt is, as Keynes noted, “a debt we owe to ourselves.”   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p