Skip to main content

Lamont And His Party’s Left Wing

Lamont, Biden and Hayes

On some issues – the speculative impact of fossil fuels on the environment, for instance – Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont is sitting in the same ideological pew as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Leon Trotsky of progressives in New England, and socialists bawling from the rooftops such as Vermont  Senator Bernie Sanders, who has not had an original thought since his college days in the silly sixties, when it was considered cool politically to brush cheeks with the Ortega brothers in Nicaragua (Pronounced on college campuses of the day Knee-Ka-RRRRAG-WA) or the Castro brothers in Cuba (Pronounced KU-BA).

Lamont is a wealthy millionaire, with a well-appointed family homestead in Maine to which he might retire from a state in the process of conforming to the now possible impossible dreams of quixotic, memory defective progressives.

Lamont, like all good Democrats, is also a faithful camp follower; so is Dick Blumenthal, husband of the daughter of a rich New York landlord who owns, among other properties, the Empire State building. It helps, when you are in politics, to marry well.

Lamont has resisted taxes levied on the rich and some business taxes. But, fearful of progressive kick-back, he has not cleared his throat on the more important question of state spending. Most of us in the middle and lower orders know that spending and taxation are two faces of the same coin. And the two faces are casually connected. The more you get, the more you spend; the more you spend the better you feel; so eat entrepreneurial capital at every meal. And never mind that small and midsized entrepreneurs, whose profit line falls short of that of Warren Buffet or Lowell Weicker, father of Connecticut’s income tax,  or Dick Blumenthal, who married well,  need their capital more than rich politicians living the good life with second and third homes and, in Weicker’s case, second and third wives.

State spending is, quite literally, the pink elephant in Connecticut’s Democrat dominated political house. Progressives in the state’s General Assembly have managed over the years to redefine taxation and spending – the same coin, remember – as “investments.” Progressives regard all investments by the state as unquestionably good, even when they are bad investments. Lamont’s wife, a hedge fund investor, knows a good money deal when she sees one, unlike most politicians. And deep-pocket capitalist investors who continue to support a new-model progressive Democrat Party through generous campaign donations rather hope that the Governor is attentive to her pillow talk.

Faced with a resurgent progressivism, Lamont finds himself walking barefoot on a razor’s edge. Progressives want to remake Connecticut’s tax structure so that the rich will finally pay their “fair share,” before moving abruptly to other more tax friendly states.

Facing a recession caused in part by autocratic governors who have closed businesses in response to a now disappearing Coronavirus infestation, President Joe Biden, the nominal head of the national Democrat Party, put the kibosh on a Keystone pipeline that might have safely delivered low cost, natural gas to the country’s breadbasket. At the same time, the increasingly progressive Biden administration has, through a wrong-headed foreign policy borrowed from the Obama administration, given the nod to a Russian pipeline that now will deliver energy to much of central Europe.

The Biden administration opened a semipermeable border to illegal immigrants, and is now in the process of sharing hordes of border busters with other than Border States. Connecticut signaled some months ago it would be willing to accept its “fair share” of illegal immigrants.

While Border States wince under the lash of illegal immigration, Vice-President-In-Charge-Of-Borders Kamala Harris has just returned from a good will tour of Honduras, (Guatemala and Mexico), where she likely discussed with the chief executives of all three countries, behind doors closed to an inquisitive media, how many dollars in foreign aid they would need to contain the overflow of illegal immigrants to the United States caused by her boss.

And, oh yes, when Biden decided to complete former President Donald Trump’s ambitious goal of bringing all American troops home from Afghanistan, Mayor of Hartford Luke Bronin cheerfully offered to make room in Connecticut’s Capital City for Afghan troops, friends of the departing Americans, now candidates for extermination by the Taliban.

Somewhere in these messy political non-solutions to pressing problems there are themes that might be exploited by campaign savvy Republicans to change the political configuration of both national and state governments. Now that both Trump and Coronavirus are disappearing from the front pages of most newspapers, the empty news space has to be filled with something – perhaps nonpartisan news. Presidential honeymoons, we know, do not last forever.

Lamont and leftists in his party are divided on a perilous economic point. Democrat Party leftists, both nationally and in Connecticut are extreme Keynesians who believe that government need never confront its debt because the national debt is, as Keynes noted, “a debt we owe to ourselves.”   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...