Skip to main content

Democrat Grindstones

Robyn Porter

Very soon Governor Ned Lamont and the Democrat majority in the state’s General Assembly will find themselves pressed between two large grindstones – public worker unions on the one hand and hard-pressed middle class workers and taxpayers only now starting to shake off with varying degrees of success the battering they have endured from the first state-ordered business shutdown in Connecticut’s history. The whole point of an unnecessary extension of gubernatorial plenary power is to delay the clash as long as possible.

Two recent rallies at the state Capitol building in Hartford – a murder row city, if one compares current murder and mayhem statistics with earlier data – shine a bright light on the struggle for what has often been called “the soul of the Democrat Party.” That struggle has been ongoing for decades, but at long last progressives in Connecticut appear to have captured the party’s heights. Nationally, Schumer, Pelosi, Biden and the leading lights of the Democrat Party appear to be on-board along with progressive state caucus leaders pulling hard at the oars. The tax-the-rich-crowd and state worker unions appear to be in a commanding position.

And don’t they know it!

Here is president of the state’s largest health care workers’ union, SEIU 1199 New England, Rob Baril firing up the crowd attending the union rally: “We are tired of being told to do more with less, we are tired of working year after year and seeing our benefits reduced and seeing our wages flattened at the same time we know that the wealthiest among us are doing better than ever.”

And behold union rabble-rouser Lyle Scruggs, a political science professor at UConn, touching with a blow torch the hearts and minds of other union pedagogues at the rally: “While lower taxes on the wealthy in Connecticut — and residents like Gov. Lamont and his family — certainly make it easier for them to pay for prep schools and private universities, cuts in state support make it harder for the state’s working families to afford a degree at a premier public institution.”

The average salary of a UConn professor, according to Data Chronicle, is $150,000 per year. To be sure, the salary is far less than the combined yearly salary of millionaires Lamont and his wife, Annie Lamont, “a venture capitalist investing in transformative companies and entrepreneurs,” according to her biography in the Office of the Governor’s Official State Website. Annie Lamont brings far more to the family supper table than the governor, whose average salary is $150,000. While running for governor in 2018, Lamont publicly released some tax information showing an “average adjusted gross income of $3.6 million in each of the past five years, primarily in investment income,” according to CTMirror. But Ned Lamont’s salary ain’t peanuts either.

Rob Baril’s total compensation was $118,772 in 2019, according to Union Facts.com. The average salary for a far less privileged fast food attendant is $48,000 per year. No one in the Democrat Party is proposing to make these salary and benefit differentials more equitable by, for example, reducing the take home pay and benefits of union administrators and progressive party honchoes. When Saint Francis started his order, he appeared naked before his bishop as an indication that he personally had accepted the renunciation of goods that early became a distinguishing mark of the Franciscans.

There are no saints in Connecticut politics. But there are ambitious autocrats such as “King Ned” and the usual whips in the Democrat dominated General Assembly, which once again decided on Wednesday – a day that will not, but should, live in infamy – to reinvest “King Ned” with plenary powers, just in case someone in the cowardly Democrat caucus should catch the sniffles and suppose they will die from a new strain of Coronavirus.

Among the 9 Democrats in the House and 4 in the Senate who broke with their party on the question of extending the governor's emergency powers at a time when the emergency had past was Representative Robyn Porter of New Haven, who heroically arose from a lock-step Democrat bunch of bananas on Wednesday.

Tired of being whipped by caucus leaders of her party, Porter said – publicly! -- “There was a time when I feel this executive order power for the governor was in order and appropriate, however I do not currently feel that way. I know that some of us who have decided to vote no are being told that there will be ramifications from the governor’s office. I want to put that on the record, because I am voting no today and will not be bullied, I will not be threatened, I will not be intimidated and I take offense – tremendous offense – to the act of even putting that in the atmosphere.”

So then, we have one outspoken St. Francis tucked in a partisan swamp of arrogant pretenders. Perhaps there may be a slender chance yet for representative democracy. No one should doubt that Porter will in the future pay for her courageous independence. And Connecticut just now is rich in federal money that may be used, temporarily, to stuff the usual deep pockets of union leaders, always indispensable to Democrats in the coming campaign season.

The more things change, the French say, the more they remain the same.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p