Skip to main content

Opening Day At The Tax And Spend Factory



The opening day of Connecticut’s new tax and spend season had been postponed because of a snow storm. But the storm was neither long enough nor the snow deep enough to prevent legislators from making their appointed rounds.

Governor Dannel Malloy, the author of the largest tax increase in Connecticut’s history, was characteristically optimistic – utopians usually are  – and his opening day speech, a spare 43- minutes, was interrupted by the General Assembly members assembled more than 50 times.

Mr. Malloy’s speech was larded with applause lines such as these:

Together we’ve turned a $3.6 billion deficit into a $500 million surplus (unfortunately, the General Assembly is looking forward to future deficits)…

we should continue to reduce our long-term debt by making an extra $100 million payment toward state pension obligations. The return on that investment will mean a $430 million reduction in our long-term debt…

we should give something back to Connecticut taxpayers, (a $55 slice of the temporary budget surplus) because if the people of Connecticut are going to share in the sacrifice during tough times, (and they did, coughing up $1.8 billion in new taxes) they should also share in the recovery as things begin to turn around…

we can issue a targeted refund to Connecticut taxpayers to return to them some of the sales and gas taxes they’ve paid. A refund of $110 for families and $55 for individuals will help offset the payments they’ve made toward those taxes… (Mr. Malloy did not provide in his speech a number indicating the amount of the tax payments they had made after Mr. Malloy became governor, but the amount, $1.8 billion, dwarfs the temporary targeted refund)…

by giving money back to people who will spend it on things they need, we’re also injecting $155 million directly into our state's economy. Economists at the University of Connecticut predict that this refund could result in 1,200 new jobs in Connecticut this year…

[In the future] whenever Connecticut has the means, (not, according to figures supplied by Comptroller Kevin Lembo, in the near future) we do three things: we shore up our savings, we reduce our debt, and we give back to taxpayers…

our teachers’ pension payments are taxed differently than social security – which teachers can’t participate in. Let’s treat teachers’ pensions more like social security by exempting part of those payments from the state income tax (the exemption will be permanent, not temporary, and certainly not contingent upon the fabled Connecticut recovery)…

the tax cuts in my proposed budget amount to more than $280 million over the next two years, and more than $440 million when you include the tax refund...

let’s commit Connecticut to achieving universal pre-kindergarten…

It will be a long and thoughtful process, but if you believe as I do that education is the civil rights issue of our time, then I ask you to join me today in taking the first steps toward making sure every child has access to a pre-k experience…

let’s help make college a little more affordable. 

We can do it with a simple promise to Connecticut parents: beginning this year, for every child born or adopted in Connecticut, the state will help them start a tax-free college savings account and put a $100 investment into it for them…

And if parents save another $150 dollars in the first four years, we’ll match that for a total state investment of $250 dollars…

I look forward to working with our great treasurer Denise Nappier to create this “CHET   Baby   Scholars” program…

The “Transform CSCU 2020” initiative will provide an initial investment of more than $134 million to help bring all 17 campuses into a single, student-centered, technology rich-system...

When a student fails to graduate from college it’s a lost opportunity for the student…

 Here’s what we can do.

If you're a student who began a degree program but have been out of school for more than 18 months, Connecticut will offer one free course for each course you take at a public college – and up to three free courses in total – if you come back and matriculate.

This "Go Back to Get Ahead" program will run for a limited amount of time…

Teddy Roosevelt said a century ago that it’s not the critic who counts, but those who strive to do great things…

Mark Twain called Connecticut “the land of steady habits,” and through our long and storied history, many of those habits have driven us to accomplish great things. Our courage helped found this country, and our ingenuity helped spur the industrial revolution…

We hear plenty of critics now. Even as sunshine begins to break through the clouds, there are some intent on hoping for thunderstorms…

We should not listen. Connecticut is moving forward

And now, during this session, those critics will say that for one reason or another that we can’t increase the minimum wage, that we can’t expand access to early childhood education, that we can’t find ways to make college more affordable.

They’ll say the time isn’t right, or that Connecticut just can’t afford to do it.

I say they’re wrong. Connecticut must move forward, because the people of our state have sacrificed, and now they deserve to share (if only temporarily and contingently) in our emerging recovery... (It took Connecticut 10 years to recover the jobs lost during the state’s last, softer recession, following the Weicker income tax increases. This recovery will be longer and tougher, following the Malloy tax increases).

The question before us is how should we define ourselves: by our setbacks, or by our successes?...

This session, let this be our answer:

That together we will have the courage to continue pushing for bold, positive change;

The compassion to ensure that everyone can share in Connecticut’s recovery;

And the faith to believe that Connecticut’s best days are still ahead.

Thank you. May God bless you, may God bless the United States of America, and may God bless the great State of Connecticut.


There was one laugh line in Mr. Malloy’s speech: “I recognize everything I’ve laid out today is a lot to tackle in a short session. But working together, we can get it done.”


Mr. Malloy is not known for having a prominent funny bone. This line provoked chuckles because the legislators assembled before him were sensible that his speech was an opening to the “short legislative session.” No doubt some Republicans -- never part of Mr. Malloy's "we" -- were thinking, “Well, the executive office proposes and the legislative office disposes.” Considering the short legislative season, traditionally devoted to smoothing over goofs and unintended consequences in the state budget, Mr. Malloy’s ambitions may have seemed to non-utopians in the audience a trifle… well, ambitious.

But, then again, opening speeches during a new legislative session are to be taken, as Mark Twain says, “with a ton of salt.” Mr. Malloy's address was taken by some in the audience as call to campaign arms rather than a serious spasm of legislative marching orders. As a campaign document, the Malloy address makes good progressive sense. There were some few things it for all the usual Democratic Party interest groups; for instance, numerous unions in the service, retail and hospitality businesses link their base-line wages to the minimum wage and will benefit monetarily from any minimum wage increase. Real benefits to the taxpayers and hard pressed businesses in the state -- such as permanent income tax cuts, permanent and immediate reductions in regulations and across the board business tax cuts, rather than selective, crony capitalist measures designed to inflate the power of puffed up politicians -- were kept at a minimum. 

Comments

peter brush said…
It is this insistence that we must move "forward" that has been so destructive. It's fundamentally at odds with our long lost Nutmeg traditions, but, putting that aside, it's destroying the social fabric and ruining the fiscal health of the government. It would be one thing to sell our soul for counter-cultural social arrangements and redistributionist programs that actually work, but they aren't good, productive or affordable. Utopias are by definition not possible, but the pursuit of them here on Planet Nutmeg can bring, and has brought, dystopias into existence. People with rudimentary knowledge of the failures of leftist regimes going back to 1789 should be able to rein in their urge to engineer society. But, they have defined themselves in terms of their ideology, and simply can't let facts get in the way. However, Connecticut's young people are not moving forward so much as moving out.

I am surprised in scanning his speech that Governor Malloy made no mention of progress on that busway between New Britain and Hartford. Even more surprising is his failure to note the impressive achievements in Connecticut's implementation of Obamacare, especially its expansion of Medicaid.
--------
Access Health CT has signed up more than 86,001 customers by the end of Wednesday, which includes 43,840 people in private plans and 42,161 who learned they are income eligible for government-funded Medicaid.
http://www.courant.com/business/hc-access-health-ct-board-meeting-20140116,0,5490163.story
peter brush said…
The latest enrollment figures were announced Monday by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy during an event in New Haven.

"For too long we've talked about the problem of people being unable to afford quality health care, and now, Connecticut has finally done something about it," Malloy said in a statement...

The enrollment figures include 50,665 who bought private insurance plans and 71,318 who were eligible for Medicaid, which is federally funded medical coverage for low-income individuals and families.

http://www.courant.com/business/hc-access-health-ct-enrollment-goals-20140210,0,3878155.story
Don Pesci said…
PB,

Good to have those figures. I'm sure you've noticed by now that the gimmes in the Opening Day speech were not cordially received -- even by the left of center media; that's progress.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p