Roy Occhiogrosso, the Vice
President for Global Strategy who has shuttled back and forth between Governor Dannel Malloy’s administration and his duties at Global Strategy, has now become, according to a short piece in CTMirror, “a consultant
to the Connecticut Democratic Party.” Apparently, no one in Connecticut’s media
knows whether Mr. Occhiogrosso’s new Position Of Influence (POI) within the Democratic
Party’s lucrative off shore political operation is a lateral or a vertical move.
Is this a political promotion, or
is Mr. Occhiogrosso simply biding his time until his former boss, Mr. Malloy,
decides to enter the lists for governor? Mr. Malloy has said he would make an
announcement concerning his re-election as governor sometime in the merry month
of May, months after Republican gubernatorial contenders have bloodied
themselves in pre-general election cat fights.
How much is Mr. Occhiogrosso and/or
Global Strategy getting paid for the new consultancy? And, more importantly, what
specific service has Mr. Occhiogrosso, once called Mr. Malloy’s “uber-flack” by CTMirror, performed for Connecticut’s Democratic Party? Even more importantly, has
Mr. Occhiogrosso declared on his tax forms all emoluments he may have received
from the party for which he may or may not have performed a service?
The Feds, as Mr. Occhiogrosso must
know, are back in Connecticut. They are, according to a blog written by Kevin Rennie for the Hartford Courant, gathering data in a Grand Jury that could be used by prosecutors to cut
short former Governor John Rowland’s career as a radio talk show host.
A conviction may turn on the
question: Did Mr. Rowland in fact perform a service for Brian Foley, the owner of a number of nursing homes, for which Mr. Foley paid Mr.
Rowland $30,000? The operative prosecutorial assumption is that Mr. Rowland had
received a payment from Mr. Foley in exchange for a political favor extended to
Mr. Foley’s wife, Lisa Wilson Foley, who had been running as a Republican
candidate for the U.S. Senate in Connecticut’s 5th District. Neither
Mrs. Foley nor Mr. Rowland were politicians at the time of the possible
political pay-off.
Nor is it certain that there was a
political pay-off. It has been said that
Mr. Rowland had been critical of former State Senator Andrew Roraback on his
program at a time when Lisa-Wilson Foley and other Republican contestants were
involved in a struggle to obtain the Republican Party nomination for the 5th
District U.S. Senate seat. The nomination fell to Mr. Roraback, who thereafter
lost the contest in a general election to Democratic Party nominee Elizabeth
Esty. Ms. Esty prevailed over union favored Democratic candidate Chris
Donovan following a federal investigation into campaign financing
irregularities that had forced Mr. Donovan to vacate the field. After his loss
to Ms. Esty, Mr. Roraback was appointed by Mr. Malloy to Connecticut’s Superior
Court.
It cannot be said that Mr.
Rowland’s criticism of Mr. Roraback resulted in any political harm to Mr.
Roraback, who emerged as the nominee of his party. Neither did Ms. Foley receive an effective political
benefit from radio talk show host Rowland, and most grown-ups understand that
conservative radio talk show hosts tend to prefer the less leftward leaning
candidate in any Republican Party contest.
Some people regard Mr. Rowland as
providing balance to Connecticut’s left of center media hegemon, which tends to
support the most leftward leaning candidate in primaries and general elections.
The Hartford Courant, for instance, supported Ms. Esty over Mr. Roraback in the
general election, even though Mr. Roraback easily passed the paper’s several
litmus tests: The Republican candidate was a social liberal and a fiscal conservative;
he had far more practical experience in government than Ms. Esty, and he was
just the sort of moderate Republican, occasionally favored by the Courant, who
might have provided a necessary balance in Connecticut’s all progressive
Democratic U.S. Congressional delegation.
As a practical matter, the
Courant’s endorsement of Esty was more fatal to Mr. Roraback than was Mr.
Rowland’s “attack” on Mr. Roraback before the Republican nominating convention had
chosen him as its designated candidate for the 5th District.
None of these quibbles would
prevent a Grand Jury – essentially a prosecutorial Star Chamber operation –
from returning an indictment against Mr. Rowland. A Grand Jury properly primed
by an aggressive prosecutor is fully capable of indicting a watermelon on a
charge of jaywalking. But the case against Mr. Rowland appears weak, if only
because neither he nor Ms. Foley were active politicians in a position to dispense
political favors and, bearing in mind Mr. Rowland’s public persona as a
“conservative” talk show host, his negative endorsement of Mr. Roraback is not in
the least surprising. How is a talk show “attack” on Mr. Roraback substantially
different than an editorial attack on a candidate for office whose opponent is
favored by the editorial board of a newspaper?
The notion that a radio talk show
host would embrace a candidate for office, accept money from the husband of the
candidate for a service that either was or was not performed, and then attack
the favored candidate’s opponent is a shabby proposition. Some journalists would rightly and indignantly reject such an arrangement; so would honorable politicians. But jail time for a radio talk show
host who pumps up an ideologically like-minded political wannabe – maybe not.
The failure to pay taxes for services
rendered, on the other hand, is a whole different kettle of fish. Mr. Rowland’s
tax payments had better be in order. And while prosecutors are on the hunt in
Connecticut, Mr. Occhiogrosso’s tax representations also had better be able to
pass the Mackerel in moonlight sniff test.
One can never be too careful.
Comments
--------------
Roy believes that, at some level, everything is about communications. And that if you communicate proactively and properly – using traditional and new media, and social media, internally and externally – you can win your fights and avoid problems.
http://globalstrategygroup.com/team/roy-occhiogrosso/
"Whatever might be true of the American people, certainly American social science has adopted the very attitude toward natural right which, a generation ago, could still be described...as characteristic of German thought... Present day social science, as far as it is not Roman Catholic social science, is dedicated to the proposition that all men are endowed by the evolutionary process or by a mysterious fate with many kinds of urges and aspirations, but certainly with no natural right."
------------------
C.S. Lewis circa 1943:
"This conception in all its forms, Platonic, Aristotelian, Stoic, Christian, and Oriental alike, I shall henceforth refer to for brevity simply as ‘the Tao‘. Some of the accounts of it which I have quoted will seem, perhaps, to many of you merely quaint or even magical. But what is common to them all is something we cannot neglect. It is the doctrine of objective value, the belief that certain attitudes are really true, and others really false, to the kind of thing the universe is and the kind of things we are."
https://rodiagnusdei.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/c-s-lewis-the-abolition-of-man-chapter-1-men-without-chests/