One of the reasons Americans are by nature optimistic is
that they seem to believe that there is no problem on earth to which there is
not at least one technological solution.
State politicians are now actively engaged in addressing the
mass murder in Sandy Hook where, more than a month ago, a gunman fired upon
school children, killing 20 children and 6 staff members at Sandy Hook
Elementary School, and some critics have attacked a few of the legislative solutions
so far offered because they regard them as non-solutions.
Two state legislators, Representative Bob Godfrey and
Senator Beth Bye, have written a bill that imposes a 50 percent tax on the total sale of ammunition,
a non-solution that struck a chord in
the heart of Democratic Majority Leader Martin Looney, who observed, “A gun without ammunition is only a club. We really need to restrict access to
ammunition.” But of course; and a car without gas
is a stationary art piece. Wishing that every rifle in Connecticut were a club
is a form of magic thinking that will do little to reduce gun crimes in the
real world.
Mr. Looney, who has been leading gun control efforts in the Democratic
dominated State Senate, recently has announced that a bill addressing the
slaughter in Sandy Hook will bypass the usual public hearing process and be
sent to the governor for his signature though an emergency certification process,
a strategy that will obviate legislative oversight and leave no unsightly
fingerprints on a final bill produced in General Assembly backrooms by
legislative leaders. Too many fingerprints on legislation might imperil
re-election efforts by removing vague assertions of approval. The Looney gambit
can only succeed by enlisting the support of a governor armed with veto power.
It is one thing to know or think you know, and it is quite a
different thing to know that you know. We should be modest about what we know
concerning the events at Sandy Hook. So far, criminal investigators have
released no definitive findings on the mass murder. After all the data has been
presented, certified and sifted, all of us can begin seriously to ponder the
problem and offer effective solutions. Until that time arrives, we are building
our Looney castles on sand.
In proposing solutions that would in the view of Governor
Dannel Malloy and others prevent future Sandy Hooks, we should first agree that
the chief problem is the unauthorized use of guns; or, to put it in police
terms, guns falling into the hands of criminals.
Pending a final report on Sandy Hook, there is some reason
to believe that the shooter illicitly acquired the weapons he used at Sandy
Hook Elementary School. If Adam Lanza’s mother had permitted her son’s use of her
weapons to slaughter children at an elementary school, Mr. Lanza need not have
murdered her.
We think we know that Mr. Lanza had at his disposal, two
semi-automatic pistols, a shotgun, which he may have left in the car he took
from his mother, and a Bushmaster long gun, a semi-automatic capable of firing
30 rounds from a dischargeable magazine. According to one news report not yet
verified by crime investigators, Mr. Lanza changed his magazines after firing
15 rounds.
Could there be a technological solution to gun crime? Is it
possible to engineer solution to the unauthorized possession of weapons?
If the weapons Mr. Lanza acquired, presumably without the
approval of his mother, had been inoperable, children’s lives might have been
saved. To put it in terms used by Mr. Looney:
If the disarmed weapons used by Mr. Lanza were clubs, the slaughter might have
been averted.
Present law requires weapons to be securely locked up and
unavailable to unauthorized users. Suppose – just to suppose – that the gun safeties
on most weapons were to be replaced by a lock operated by a fingerprint, swipe card, or biometric system, the weapon rendered inoperable after purchase until activated by
its owner each time it is used. That kind of technological solution to the
problem of the unauthorized use of stolen weapons or illicitly acquired weapons
– or some more practical method that would prevent any but an authorized user
from discharging the weapon -- would be far more helpful in averting Sandy Hook
mass murders than a tax on bullets, supposed by some to be a craven attempt to
raise needed revenue that would not affect the illicit purchase of weapons or
bullets.
Creating such a technological solution – not necessarily
those suggested above-- that would render a firearm inoperable to anyone but an
authorized purchaser ought to be a snap for a country that can put a rover on
Mars. Where there is a will, there is a way; and where there is a demonstrable
need, there is money to be made by some energetic and creative weapons
manufacturer.
We already know that not every sociological or economic
problem here in the land of Alexander Graham Bell, Henry Ford, Samuel Morse,
Orville and Wilber Wright and Samuel Colt yields to legislation.
Sometimes it takes an engineer to carve a path out of the
wilderness to a safe and secure future.
Comments
Right. There is no such thing as a perfect undeveloped technology. Need usually provides the push behind emergent technologies. See Biomatic here: http://biomacfoundation.org/index.php
Not bad.
Click on the “biometric” link in the text and you can read more about smart guns. I didn’t want to mention a specific smart gun designer in the blog, because it is also a column. The emergent technology allows as many as 11 users, and present weaponry can be retrofitted with the system. The idea is not to prevent a purchase but to prevent unauthorized use.
Here’s some of the info:
A U.S. and Austrian company whose system employs a biometric array of up to eight optical sensors which will be molded into the handle of the weapon[11]. None of the optical sensors will rely on geographic parameters, like fingerprints, but will measure biometric data below the skin. The biometric access technology which will be developed by BIOMAC BIOMAC will allow authorized gun owners to program the biometrics of up to eleven additional users into their weapon. All previous systems having been developed or which are being considered rely on one user per weapon. The biometric data programed into the weapon will be done at authorized weapon dealers, and will remain in the weapon. BIOMAC's goal of a 99.99 percent reliability rate with recognition occurring in .5 seconds or less, if reached, will be the fastest and most reliable smart gun technology on the market. BIOMAC envisions licensing all weapon companies their technology for a nominal cost. The retrofitting of existing weapons with BIOMAC's patent-pending technology will be done through the Biomac Foundation Biomac Foundation, with all profits from the retrofitting going to victims of global violence[12]. For military and police use the biometrics of soldiers and/or law enforcement will be printed on a wearable device, like a wrist band, which once worn will allow the soldier and/or any other police officer wearing the biometric wrist band to pick up any biometric weapon programed for their organization. The wrist bands will not be useable by anyone other person than the people they have been programed for. In this manner every soldier will be able to use any military weapon they may need to fire, and not have to have their individual biometrics programmed into the weapon.
The smart gun is supposed to:
• Reduce the likelihood of unintentional injuries to children
• Preventing teenage suicides and homicides.
• Limit the violent acts committed by criminals using stolen guns.
• Protect law enforcement officers from criminals grabbing their firearms during a struggle.
If chip failure occurs one of two things can happen:
• For civilian use, the gun will be set to not fire.
• For law enforcement use, the safety system will be bypassed, and the gun will be allowed to fire.