Skip to main content

Random Acts of Free Speech


“The Republicans have had their chance at ruining the country, and now it’s the Democrat’s turn. I’m sure they’ll do a better job of it.”

“A better job of what?”

“Ruining the country.”

___________________

“Did you see the new Lincoln film ?” [“Lincoln,” directed by Steven Spielberg]

“I don’t go to the movies anymore.”

“Great flick. Some people have objected to Daniel Day-Lewis’ speaking voice; weak, they say.”

“Lincoln had a high pitched voice. [Steven] Douglas’s voice was deeper, more resonant.”

“How do you know that?”

“I read history books. It helps to pass the time when I’m not at the movies.

___________________

“Too bad about Lindsay Lohan. [The actress had just bopped someone in a bar]

“Some people never learn.”

“What do you think’s behind all that?”

“Maybe she’s roll-playing. Some of these Hollywood types have a real problem detaching themselves from their personas. Just look at Charley Sheen.”

 “A mess.”

“And Madonna, at the end of her career, showing her nipples on stage… Just sing…

“That’s what Elton John said.”

“Who?”

____________________
 

“There’s a woman in Florida -- a mail carrier no less – who slipped some poison into her husband’s tuna fish sandwich. Here’s the lede on the story, listen [reading from the paper]: ‘A Central Florida mail carrier was arrested on attempted murder charges after she tried to poison her husband's tuna fish sandwich, according to deputies.”

“That’s terrible.”

‘Yeah. I don’t think you can poison a sandwich. It won’t die, no matter how much poison you put in it. You can PUT POISON INTO A SANDWICH in an attempt to POISON YOUR HUSBAND. But you can’t poison the sandwich.”

“That’s terrible.”

“I know. Teaching grammar in fourth grade to prospective reporters is a lost art.”

“No, I mean it’s terrible she tried to poison her husband.”

“That too.”

___________________
 

After seeing an Oliver Stone film in which he bumps fists, supportively, with Venezuelan demagogue Hugo Chavez: “In Oliver Stone’s hands, a movie camera is a weapon of mass disinformation. He’s our Walter Duranty,” the ace New York Times reporter and Pulitzer Prize winner who thought Stalin’s man-made famine in Ukraine was neither man-made nor a famine].”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...