Skip to main content

The New Nobility


In the Early American Republic of blessed memory, such eminences as George Washington declined titles, much in use in England at the time. The moderns, as Zach Janowski demonstrates in “Raising Hale,” have no such compunctions.

In the 36-member Senate, there are 36 titled officials. In the more modest House, “only two out of three members gets a fancy title” – and an extra stipend to boot.

The House listing by dollar is here, and the Senate listing here.

Mr. Janowski unwittingly has presented a strong argument for a unicameral legislature. Such an organ of popular representation would be less titled, more broadly representative and more responsible to the sort of people Washington thought were virtuous, economical and modest.

Comments

Fuzzy Dunlop said…
Don,
I agree with you that a unicameral legislature makes a lot of sense. But I'm still always struck by how little our legislators make, even with the added bonus for certain positions. Consider Speaker Donovan... is there any doubt that being Speaker is essentially a full time job? Granted, the hours are greatly reduced when the legislature is not in session, however the grueling hours legislators are required to work while the General Assembly IS in session make almost impossible to have any kind of normal job. Instead, legislators are required to either be a) independently wealthy or b) have jobs outside of work that are happy to make the tradeoff of employee productivity for influence (see Larry Cafero, partner at Brown Rudnick).

The real cheddar is not in being a legislator, but being a staffer. Consider Derek Slap, former news anchor and now spokesman for the Senate Democrats. He is the mouthpiece for a PARTISAN caucus, a position that is wholly political, and he rakes in 111,000 per year. George Gallo, chief of staff for the house Republicans, takes home a cool 152,000 a year... again, for a partisan position. Folks coming into entry level positions, e.g. legislative aides, executive aides, etc. etc., are, as a rule, making about 10-20K more a year than entry level managers in almost any other company. Meanwhile, newly minted prosecutors are often required to work for a year or so on a per diem basis, without health benefits, and even then cap out well BELOW what mssr. Gallo is making. Where the hell are our priorities?

In sum, if we want to cut waste in legislative salaries, it is best done by reducing both the number of staff (which would be done indirectly by going to a unicameral legislature as you propose) and also the salaries they make (simply bring them in line with the private market for Chrissake). Attacking the salaries of already underpaid legislators seems like a snipe hunt.
Don Pesci said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Don Pesci said…
Brilliant. If it were up to me, I would condemn all legislators to write their own press releases. Between us, I’m sure we can think of some other punishing things for them to do.

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e