Skip to main content

The New Nobility


In the Early American Republic of blessed memory, such eminences as George Washington declined titles, much in use in England at the time. The moderns, as Zach Janowski demonstrates in “Raising Hale,” have no such compunctions.

In the 36-member Senate, there are 36 titled officials. In the more modest House, “only two out of three members gets a fancy title” – and an extra stipend to boot.

The House listing by dollar is here, and the Senate listing here.

Mr. Janowski unwittingly has presented a strong argument for a unicameral legislature. Such an organ of popular representation would be less titled, more broadly representative and more responsible to the sort of people Washington thought were virtuous, economical and modest.

Comments

Fuzzy Dunlop said…
Don,
I agree with you that a unicameral legislature makes a lot of sense. But I'm still always struck by how little our legislators make, even with the added bonus for certain positions. Consider Speaker Donovan... is there any doubt that being Speaker is essentially a full time job? Granted, the hours are greatly reduced when the legislature is not in session, however the grueling hours legislators are required to work while the General Assembly IS in session make almost impossible to have any kind of normal job. Instead, legislators are required to either be a) independently wealthy or b) have jobs outside of work that are happy to make the tradeoff of employee productivity for influence (see Larry Cafero, partner at Brown Rudnick).

The real cheddar is not in being a legislator, but being a staffer. Consider Derek Slap, former news anchor and now spokesman for the Senate Democrats. He is the mouthpiece for a PARTISAN caucus, a position that is wholly political, and he rakes in 111,000 per year. George Gallo, chief of staff for the house Republicans, takes home a cool 152,000 a year... again, for a partisan position. Folks coming into entry level positions, e.g. legislative aides, executive aides, etc. etc., are, as a rule, making about 10-20K more a year than entry level managers in almost any other company. Meanwhile, newly minted prosecutors are often required to work for a year or so on a per diem basis, without health benefits, and even then cap out well BELOW what mssr. Gallo is making. Where the hell are our priorities?

In sum, if we want to cut waste in legislative salaries, it is best done by reducing both the number of staff (which would be done indirectly by going to a unicameral legislature as you propose) and also the salaries they make (simply bring them in line with the private market for Chrissake). Attacking the salaries of already underpaid legislators seems like a snipe hunt.
Don Pesci said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Don Pesci said…
Brilliant. If it were up to me, I would condemn all legislators to write their own press releases. Between us, I’m sure we can think of some other punishing things for them to do.

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...