Skip to main content

The Real Millionaires And Their Support Staff

Over the course of her congressional campaign, Republican Linda McMahon boasted that she was willing to sink $50 million into her bid for the U.S. Senate. The tribunes of the people immediately drew their swords. McMahon, it was said in scores of editorials and commentary pieces, was attempting to buy a seat in the congress.

The outrage directed by the Main Stream Media at McMahon, whose opponent is also a millionaire – present Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, the MSM’s anointed candidate for Sen. Chris Dodd’s seat -- has not been poured upon the heads of Democratic contestants in the state’s congressional delegation, even though CTMirror has provided unimpeachable proof that Democratic incumbents, not their impoverished Republican challengers, are the real millionaires.


Republican challengers hoping that the anti-millionaire animus directed at McMahon will now be focused laser-like on their rich and greedy Democratic opponents had better not hold their breath waiting for such as Rick Green and Colin McEnroe of the Courant -- not to cite other too numerous to mention cracker-jack liberals in Connecticut’s one-way media -- to direct their outrage at their favored Democrats.

Better just to swallow the pain of injustice and get along without these disingenuous, hypocritical, partisan liberal sons of thunder in their corner.

UPDATE SATURDAY, JULY 24, 2010

Jacqueline Rabe of CTMirror has filed an updated report on campaign financing that shows Democrats on the public financing dole far outpacing their Republican counterparts.

Comments

Fuzzy Dunlop said…
The idea that anyone would spend fifty million dollars to win a senate seat is offensive and disgusting. And I'm not one of those "because an office shouldn't be bought" whiners (Jon Corzine is proof enough that money can't buy everything). There are simply too many other good and righteous uses to which that much money could be put. The vanity that a person must possess to spend their own money in such a way will likely be a deciding factor for many, and rightly so.
Don Pesci said…
Fuzzy,

So far, McMahon’s spent about $15m for face time. I’m not sure she’s actually buying votes, though that might stimulate the economy better than giving about $15b to a business too big to fail. Under certain circumstances, lots of face time MIGHT get you votes. I just thought it important to point out that over on the other side of the barracks, the same thing was happening: Each Democratic in the U.S. congressional delegation is a millionaire, the Republican challenging him a relative pauper. The money advantage spread is equally great in both cases. And, of course, the incumbent politicians are spending other people’s money. McMahon is spending her own. The outrage, however merited, has not been equally distributed. Green and McEnroe are not biting their fingernails down to their cuticles because John Larson, who owns the safest seat on the American continent, is spending $1,821,098 on his campaign, while Ann Brinkley is spending $73,682. The difference is, to use your word, especially disgusting because, owing to gerrymandering, the 1st District really is owned by the Democrats and cannot be purchased by a Republican for any price – not even McMahon’s millions.
Don Pesci said…
Actually the bailout, according to this report -- http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2010140720100721 -- has reached $3.7 trillion. One would have to divide that number by the number of firms bailed out to find the average. It's much more than the $15b cited aove.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p