Skip to main content

Weicker At UConn Law

Ex-Governor and Senator Lowell Weicker appeared at the UConn Law School and gave a talk that touched on a number of subjects: health care, beltway manners, and bill paying averse legislators at the state capitol among them.

Weicker on his reluctance to run for governor, as reported by Jeff Cohen of WNPR: "Somebody asked me, when I came on campus, wouldn't you like to be governor....Helloooo????"

This as our tax belabored state is poised to celebrate the upcoming 20th anniversary of the Axe The Tax rally in Hartford. It seems like only yesterday, except for the many UConn students too young to have a personal memory of the event.



All the spirits that hovered around Weicker on that grand day are very much in the air we breathe. Joe Markley -- who, along with Tom Scott, was responsible for the anti-tax rally in Hartford – is once again running for his old seat in the state senate, and he has a righteous wind at his back.

The Weicker tax, as it was designed to do, made life very easy indeed for tax and spend state legislators. The highly regressive income tax – most of which comes out of the pockets of millionaires, some of whom live in Weicker’s old digs in Greenwich, Connecticut – has contributed billions of dollars in surpluses that should have been returned by the spendthrift legislature to the little folk living on Main Street, who now are having some difficulty sending their children to UConn Law.

One of the signs at the Axe The Tax rally 20 years ago was a very modest, hand written one emblazoned with the legend: “Hartford Tea Party.”

Lately, the tea parties have gown in size and strength in direct proportion to the ill conceived Weicker tax and its inevitable consequence: a budget that has grown, since Weicker introduced his tax, from 7 to 14 billion.

Weicker on health care:
“When Weicker got to the heart of his talk, he said that preventing illness is cheaper than treating it and it's better for patients. And now that the nation has a new health care law, Weicker says it's time to make it better.

"’The time has come now to move on past all the rhetoric and do the right thing. Repealing healthcare it isn't going to happen. I don't care who's in power. To be in pain or in fear of death with nowhere to go is not something that I would wish on anyone.’"
Weicker on beltway habits:

"The last several months of public discourse have marked a low point as to how we treat and view each others as Americans. The debate has been just as bad on the floor of the house and the senate as it has on the streets of America,” a rather prissy attitude for someone who once described himself as a “turd in the Republican Party punchbowl.”

And touching upon flabby spines state legislators, Weicker managed to sound like a cross between Billy Graham and Zarathustra:

“And, speaking of political will, he had a few words after his speech was over for leaders at the state capitol, as this year's legislative session wound to a close with an apparent one-year budget fix.

"’The time has come to pay the bill here in the State of Connecticut and you can't kick it down the road. I pray for a little steel up the spine. This is the moment that they're elected for.’

“Because, Weicker said, a solution that lasts just 365 days isn't much of a solution at all.”
When Wicker made his remarks, he was well outside the epicenter of the implosion at the state capitol, where spineless legislators decided to burry their heads in red ink.

Weicker has not said whether he would prefer to liquidate the state’s ever growing debt through spending reductions or tax hikes, though if personal history is any predictor of behavior, one supposes he would prefer to raise the income tax he bestowed upon us, lo those many years ago.

Calling for specific tax hikes – or perhaps spending cuts that might make the dean of UConn Law a bit queasy – would take some courage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p