Skip to main content

Dodd and Swan Appalled

Those who are used to seeing Tom Swan – current director of Connecticut’s Citizen Action Group and past director of Ned Lamont’s failed senatorial campaign against current U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman – in his appalled mode will not be surprised to learn that he was “appalled” at the suggestion, according to a piece in the New Haven Independent, “that he and other progressives present were being used to rescue a senator [U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd] who got too cozy with financial barons and predators.”

Dodd has been traveling about the state visiting liberal watering holes, with an obliging train of progressives in tow, in an attempt some would consider desperate to shore up his tattered reputation.

Lately, Dodd has suggested that those in the Bush administration who had facilitated the water boarding of Kalid Sheik Mohammed should be tried in court, as were Nazi war criminals prosecuted in Nuremburg by his father.

A short video clip shown on MyLeftNutmeg, a left wing blog, shows Dodd holding forth on what has become his favorite topic: Let’s Nuremburgize "the war on terror," an expression that has been rejected by the Obama administration in favor of the less descriptive "overseas contingency operation."

The war on terror is over; the “overseas contingency operation,” a more Orwellian and less descriptive phrase, has begun.

Kalid Sheik Mohammed was the master-mind of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Center Towers in New York. He also has boasted that he had personally hacked off the head of Daniel Pearl, a New York Times reporter who, unfortunately, was not given the amenities that Dodd feels should be showered upon the sheik in an attempt to demonstrate to that portion of the world where overseas contingency operations may be necessary that we are a nation of laws, not men.

Most experts on torture, not excepting Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, would agree that the sheik is a torturer. Pelosi has had a devil of a time convincing non-credulous reporters that she was not briefed on water boarding.

But it is safe to speculate that people like Swan, whose sensibilities are easily rubbed raw, would consider the sheik’s beheading of Pearl and his facilitation of the deaths of upwards of a thousand Americans in the World Trade Center bombing -- actually there were two bombings, the first occurring during President Bill Clinton’s enlightened administration -- appalling.

There are some on the right side of the constitution who quibble over the question whether water boarding is torture; the sheik was dunked, so to speak, numerous times before he coughed up information that some in the Bush administration considered “actionable,” with consequences to his health less serious than those endured by Pearl, among others. Actionable information is data extracted by intelligence gatherers (torturers?) that may be used to avert future unpleasant episodes like the World Trade Center bombing, the attack on the Pentagon and the foiled attack on the U.S. Congress, where Sen. Dodd and other future prosecutors of Bush administrative officials ply their trade.

My own rule in these cases is to conform my judgment whenever possible, except in matters of faith and doctrine, to the atheist writer Christopher Hitchens, who had himself water boarded and pronounced that the practice was torture.

The immediate problem the Obama administration and Sen. Dodd face is what to do with the prisoners at the soon to be closed Gitmo facility in Cuba? Apparently, no one yet has suggested they be moved to one or another of the unoccupied properties the Dodds own in Washington D.C., Hamden Connecticut and Connemara, in County Galway, Ireland. What to do with future prisoners taken in the Democrat’s new war in Afghanistan also may prove troubling; former President Clinton liked to rendition his overseas “contingency people” in places like Egypt, where the contingents were, shall we say, “interrogated.”

Putting all these quibbles aside, it may be important to point out that the U.S. Congress and the White House are now owned by Democrats. Presumably, they will do with both, as well as the country and the wider world, whatever they like.

One can only hope that Swan, the proprietor on MyLeftNutmeg and other delicate liberals like Dodd will not be appalled at the consequences.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p