Skip to main content

Our Bums

Ken Dixon, a reporter and blogger with the Connecticut Post, realized after he had assembled a transcript of a media opportunity with President Pro Tem of the state Senate Don Williams that he had a mini- Marx Brothers movie in hand.

Reporters were asking Williams about what Dixon called “the bicameral ethics of the state senate,” controlled these many years by fastidious Democrats.

The State Elections Enforcement Commission had just penalized Sen. Joe Crisco, D-Woodbridge, $4,000 for having signed the names of his campaign officials on documents he had used to apply for up to $85,000 in taxpayer funded campaign cash, often called forgery. And the reporters in the room were just curious: Could Williams please put the DeLuca case in context with the Crisco case?

Lou DeLuca, at the time a leading Republican with a sterling record, was drummed out of the senate after an FBI agent got him to agree in a conversation that he would be willing to accept the services of the agent, then pretending to be an associate of a reputed mob influenced trash hauler. The agent said he would be delighted to take care of the senator’s son-in-law, whom the senator believed had roughed up his granddaughter.

When DeLuca, once the highest ranking member of the Republican caucus, mentioned a previous ordeal of Sen. Tom Gaffey, the second Democrat recently fined for ethics violations, Williams, in high dungeon, responded, “For Lou DeLuca to have brought this up is an outrage. For somebody who was investigated by the FBI, the chief state's attorney's office, and but for the fact that law enforcement was able to break up the hit that he ordered on a relative, he would be in jail. For him to start talking about Tom Gaffey, who broke no law … we're talking about two different universes."

Derek Slap, Williams’ spokesperson, commented "It is sad, considering the difficult times facing Connecticut and its families, that the leader of the Republican Party [Party Chairman Chris Healy] and a disgraced former senator would waste everybody's time slinging mud. We're focused on working with Governor Rell to solve the budget crisis."

At the recent news availability, according to the transcript made by Dixon, a reporter asked Williams, “What is going to happen in the Joe Crisco case?

“Williams: I don’t foresee other action being taken over and above the very thorough and lengthy investigation that was conducted by Elections Enforcement.

“Reporter B: They said he signed falsely several times for other people on sworn documents and stood there while they were notarized. And they didn’t use the word forgery. That’s the word (State GOP Chairman) Chris Healy used. But how is that not forgery in your mind?

“Williams: You know, from my understanding, from what I’ve been told, they did not find… they didn’t have a finding against Sen. Crisco in terms of unlawful behavior…

“Reporter B: That’s not true.

“Williams: Is that not true?

“Reporter B: They said he violated the campaign laws.

“Reporter C: Numerous state laws.

“Reporter B: Numerous times, yeah.”


Sen. Crisco, who had committed forgery on notarized documents, was fined $4,000 and forced to forfeit $85,000 in public funds spent on a campaign he won. Sen. Gaffey was fined $6,000 for double billing the state and his political action committee for the same travel expenses.

Williams should revisit the DeLuca controversy and begin to treat his bums the way he was disposed to treat his political opposition’s bums.

Gaffey already has had at least two bites of the apple, and Crisco should be prosecuted for forgery.

One major newspaper has called for the prosecution of Crisco by Connecticut's chief state's attorney. Williams should be in the vanguard of those demanding that Crisco be relieved of his usufructs and his office. Connecticut’s media should boisterously insist upon it. And if Williams fails to clean his own Augean stables, he also should be given the heave-ho.

There should be no room in Connecticut politics for legislative leaders who conspire in ethical violations by protecting their own bums from a fate they so richly deserve.

Comments

Sean Murphy said…
It was Deluca's granddaughter, not daughter who was the suspected victim of abuse.
Don Pesci said…
Thanks Sean. I corrected the copy.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...