Skip to main content

The Lowell and Colin Show

“Thinking about today's show,” Colin McEnroe – blogger, author, Courant columnist and beau viviant – writes on his blog, “ I re-read Genghis Conn's excellent meditation on Weicker's 1970 three-way. (It is fun to wonder how many of the people posting comments, back then, about Lieberman crushing Lamont like a bug have revised their entomology. Hey, we ALL get stuff wrong.)”

Gengis Conn is the proprietor of Connecticut Local Politics, a much read progressive blog. The blog is read mostly for its sometimes colorful and disputative commentary section. Among the comments on the particular site to which McEnroe refers is this one:

Don Pesci (that would be me) said...
GC
I believe in God and Senator Dodd and keepin' old Castro down --Phil Ochs, Draft Dodger Rag
In the context of the times, Ochs' song is instructive. It's generally forgotten -- and never mentioned in discussions of the Dodd pere/Duffy/Weicker race that Duffey was the anti-Vietnam war dove. Dodd, unlike his son, was an aggressive anti Castroite and anti-communist. Weicker was a raging war hawk, and a conservative. Only later did his world view develop those amazing twists and turns for which he became famous. His pro-war message was one of the reasons Weicker was able to prevail in the race.
Genghis Conn said...
Very true, Don. In fact, during the first and only debate in October, another of Weicker's memorable lines was that "a nice warm jail cell" awaited draft dodgers. If I had to guess, I'd say a higher number of conservatives voted for him in that election than in any of his subsequent contests--especially post-Watergate.”

Gengis’ comment is, as the progressives might say, absolutely spot on. Weicker was elected as a conservative hawk; he did, over the course of a long career, move to the left; he was the bane of the Republican Party both as senator and governor, once referring to himself colorfully --but absolutely spot on accurately -- as “the turd in the Republican Party punchbowl.” Whenever he cudgeled individual Republicans and pulled the elephant’s nose, the Democrats snuggled up and returned him to office.

Weicker was defeated finally by his mirror opposite, current Senator Joe Lieberman. Just as the right regarded Weicker as a faux Republican – and worse – so now the left looks with the same baleful eye on Lieberman and sees … well, McEnroe is familiar with the left’s attitude towards traitor Joe. In fact, many of Lieberman’s blogging flagellators were in the studio with McEnroe as he was throwing smurfball questions at Weicker.

It is this sense of ironic cymbals crashing two inches from one’s ear that is not caught in McEnroe’s interrogatories with the ex-senator and governor. Weicker, one of the best sound bite pols in the business, was occasionally interrupted by a worshipful McEnroe with affirming grunts, but there were no claps of thunder, no lightning flashes revealing armies struggling on a darkling plain.

Now then, here is what we know about Weicker, Lieberman and Ned Lamont, the progressive’s – and Weicker’s – Great White Hope:

1) Weicker hates Lieberman and wishes to see him roasting on a spit in Hell, along side all the Connecticut voters who turned the former senator out of office.

2) It was Weicker who first publicly encouraged Lamont to run. Lamont’s campaign soon brought in Tom D’Amore, the ex-senator and governor’s hand picked ex-Republican Party chairman, to cook and wash bottles for Lamont. Yet, when Lamont phoned into the Lowell and Colin show, he said to Weicker, “Ah, so you’re on board…” At this point, one expected a snarling guffaw from the usually risible McEnroe, but the co-host was too enchanted to react, which means that McEnroe, virtually all of the bloggers who joined him in the studio and Connecticut’s uncritical media are now partisans in a struggle for political influence and status.

3) Weicker’s principal interest is – and always has been – self vindication.

Ahab, the greatest self vindicator in American literature, in pursuit of the white whale that had scarred him, is told his passion is blasphemous, to which he responds, “Speak not to me of blasphemy man – I’d strike the sun if it dare insult me!”

There is more than a little Ahab in most Americans. But then, as McEnroe reminds us, “Hey, we ALL get stuff wrong.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...