Skip to main content

Joe Lieberman Leaves Us

Lieberman

Among some people in Connecticut who genuinely like people who bravely say the inconvenient truth – there are a few – former U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman will be missed.

He left us without warning and in a pickle not of his making.

Republicans in Connecticut still praise Lieberman for flushing former U.S. Senator and Governor Lowell Weicker out of the state’s Republican Party.

Weicker was the classic “Republican in name only” (RINO) who once said of his state party, “Why doesn’t someone take it over? It’s so small.”  And he referred to himself, approvingly and truthfully, as “the turd in the Republican Party punchbowl.”

The state Republican Party did not prosper under Weicker’s tutelage. He used the party under which he prospered politically for 31 years principally as a foil that stood him in good stead with Democrats. When Weicker left the U.S. Senate, his liberal Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) rating was 10 percentage points higher than that of Democrat U.S. Senator Chris Dodd.

Described by Democrat Party favoring state journalists as “larger than life,” Weicker got too big for his britches and was challenged by Lieberman in a 1988 race for the U.S. Senate, a position Weicker had held for 18 years. Lieberman, a John F. Kennedy Democrat, was likeable and he had not managed in his 40 political career to savage Republicans. Weicker lost the race and went on to win Connecticut’s governorship in 1991 by running in a three man race as an Independent candidate, bequeathing the state income tax to his and our assigns pretty much forever. Taxes once levied are more difficult to get rid of than any of the seven deadly sins.

Lieberman occupied Weicker’s seat in the Senate for four terms, having been reelected to office in 1994, 2000, and 2006. Weicker was a maverick left of center Republican, Lieberman a moderate Democrat.

Usually the media has its reportorial obits prepared well in advance of the parting of the dearly departed. Lieberman’s departure – it has been said he died of complications from a fall – was unexpected. First mentions of his death were therefore perfunctory and may have seemed frigid to those who liked his sunny disposition. Like Hubert Humphrey, Lieberman was a happy political warrior. His political thoughts generally were directed outward, not inward. He thought hard and lucidly about politics but softly, gently about his political opponents.

Lots of people, including this writer, liked Lieberman because he was, that rarest of all things, moderately modest, a politician without an inflated ego -- and likeable. Those who disliked Lieberman did so because they were, and are, ideologically tipsy and motivated by a number of the seven deadly sins, which are, just to review: lust, envy, covetousness, anger, sloth, gluttony and pride.

As a politician, Lieberman talked with his political opponents and voted across the aisle, which in his last years in office had become an impassable ideological fence much more forbidding than the U.S. Southern border under the ministrations of President Joe Biden, the most radical Democrat president in both our lifetimes.

Pride, the good book tells us, goeth before a fall, but the other deadly sins have been known within the memory of this writer to have ensnared impossibly stupid and venal politicians. Of course, modern politicians without exception worry less about the seven deadly sins than they do about, say, an unfavorable remark in the New York Times or, God forbid, a stinging tweet, now, thanks to Elon Musk, a sharpened X.

Lieberman was too thoughtful to be prideful. Congressional Democrats, some have observed, are losing their ability to make sharp distinctions, along with their nerves. Most recently the U.S. representative at the United Nations was ordered by you-know-who to abstain from approving or vetoing a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution calling for a cease-fire in Gaza. A veto of the resolution by the United States would have been fully in keeping with Biden’s often announced resolve to protect Israel’s back.

Former adviser to Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu Caroline Glick noted, "The administration’s actions at the U.N. Security Council were a betrayal of Israel and of the hostages. By allowing resolution 2728 to pass, the U.S. blocked all paths to a diplomatic deal to secure the release of any hostages. By decoupling what Hamas wants — a cease-fire that will allow it to rebuild its terror army and its control over Gaza and so win the war — from the release of the hostages, Resolution 2728 seals the hostages’ fate."

Lieberman, a fierce defender of Israel, thought of himself as an orthodox Jew, as did the great Maimonides who, in his still readable The Guide for the Perplexed, wrote, “Truth does not become more true by virtue of the fact that the entire world agrees with it, nor less so even if the whole world disagrees with it.”

That was Lieberman.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e