Skip to main content

Inside Biden’s Plagiarized Presidency

Biden -- Alex Wong/Getty Images


Former President Barack Obama once said of his Vice President, Joe Biden, that no one should underestimate his ability to screw things up. It was a grownup thing for Obama to have said, and there is no indication Obama ever regretted saying it, though he was speaking out of school at the time.

Obama, charming and African American -- two strikes in his favor -- was not a plagiarist politician. He was, and may still be, the point of a neo-progressive spear the Democrat Party now feels indispensable in winning campaigns. Obama, an accomplished street organizer before his first of two elections, could think on his feet, and his rhetoric was not borrowed without attribution from British Labor Party politician Neil Kinnock.

In a story published by the Washington Post more than five years ago, “Echoes of Biden’s 1987 plagiarism scandal continue to reverberate”, reporter Neena Satija noted, “On Sept. 23, 1987, Joe Biden stood before a crowd of reporters and ended his first presidential campaign amid questions about a value he’d worked hard to convince voters he had: authenticity.

“The collapse had begun 11 days earlier, with news that Biden had lifted phrases and mannerisms from a British Labour (sic) Party politician [Neil Kinnock] while making closing remarks at a debate. Examples soon surfaced of Biden using material from other politicians without attribution, and he acknowledged he had been accused of plagiarism in law school. To make matters worse, a video emerged of Biden exaggerating his academic record while speaking angrily to a voter in New Hampshire.”

All this, Biden’s supporters insist, is really just a case of Biden Being Biden. This view of Biden skates around the president’s radical transformation from an inoffensive John F. Kennedy liberal to a neo-progressive radical. Historian Victor Davis Hanson tells us that Joe Biden's regime is most revolutionary Left-wing since FDR.

Misstatements, the Washington Post makes clear in its five year old story, are to be distinguished from plagiarism: “Biden’s misstatements are not on the scale of Trump’s — the president’s false or misleading claims in office number more than 10,000 so far, according to a recent count by The Washington Post. But only Biden has had a previous presidential campaign derailed by revelations of plagiarism and false statements.”

In 2020, a majority of voters agreed with Biden supporters and elected to the presidency Biden the plagiarist over Trump the misleader.

Satija did not disclose in her 2019 story how many of Trump’s misleading statements were delivered during his frequent rallies or the number of misleading statements that were repetitive misleading statements.

If this writer were in a mood to plagiarize, he might insert here as his own a quip attributed – falsely, some Pecksniffian commentators say -- to Benjamin Disraeli: “There are three kinds of lies -- lies, dammed lies and statistics.”

Then too, there is Otto von Bismarck, quoted with proper attribution by this writer in a few of his columns, now moldering in Connecticut newspaper crypts: “People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war, or before an election,” and a Bismarck quip that will continue to circulate for as long as this sad planet continues on its course around the sun, “When you want to fool the world, tell the truth.”

The truth about Biden is that his presidency is not a serious one. His is an imitative presidency. That is why comics – not all of them on the right – are now having such a bang-up time with the Biden presidency.

The plagiarist, wherever he is found, is someone who, like a scarecrow, stuffs himself with rhetorical straw filched from his neighbor. The stuffing makes him appear less lean and hungry and spiritually vacant. But it is spiritual emptiness that is the principal cause of plagiarism -- that, in addition to suppressed envy and a tablespoon of self-loathing.

The truth about Biden is that plagiarism has ever been a fixed part of his character, as demonstrated in Satija’s little read story.

The latest incident of Biden plagiarism relates to the president’s recent State of the Union speech, criticized by some as a campaign manifesto rather than a traditional address. Parts of the speech were copied and pasted without attribution into Biden’s non-State of the Union Speech from his earlier speeches, an instance of Biden plagiarizing from his own speech archive.

Critics of the speech assert that the address avoided an accurate depiction of a State of the Union in disarray – a porous border, an economy on its heels owing to excessive government spending, a monstrous, growth killing deficit, and a president who is a chronic borrower and lender of leftist ideas --    because such an accounting would not advance Biden’s reelection prospects.

All the polls show a nation dissatisfied with a president unmoored from standard governing principles, buffeted and moved forward by neo-progressives in his party. One year before Electoral College members will gather to choose the next president, Biden’s approval ratings are stories below the cellar.

Joe Biden's Approval Rating Falls to All-Time Low After SOTU,” according to Newsweek: “President Joe Biden's average approval rating is currently at its lowest of his entire time in office despite a positive reaction to his recent State of the Union address. Biden's approval rating currently stands at 37.4 percent, the lowest since he recorded an average of 37.6 percent in December 2023, according to poll aggregator FiveThirtyEight's national average calculations.”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...