Skip to main content

Countdown to Midterms 2022

David Brooks -- New York Times

 

For Democrats, the signs of the times appear to be pointing downward, and the American media also appears to be tottering on the abyss.

“Just 7% of Americans have ‘a great deal’ of trust and confidence in the media” Gallup reported recently, “and 27% have a fair amount… Meanwhile, 28% of U.S. adults say they do not have very much confidence and 38% have none at all in newspapers, TV and radio. Notably, this is the first time that the percentage of Americans with no trust at all in the media is higher than the percentage with a great deal or a fair amount combined.”

Citing “The Economist / YouGov poll on Wednesday,” Newsweek reports, “Biden's net approval fell 14 points to 39 percent. Earlier, Biden had an unusually high approval rating from ‘less committed Democrats’ YouGov says. The president ended the week with a 45 percent approval rating. Independents, however, seem to be giving Biden the cold shoulder as his approval fell a whopping 18 percent in the past week.”

New York Times columnist David Brooks, whose head does not instantly burst into flame when struck by a progressive or far-right hammer, provides some sobering statistics in a recent column, “Why the Republicans are surging in the polls.”

The news wrung out of telling statistics, he notes, “…is not good for team blue. In the latest New York Times/Siena College poll, 49% of likely voters said they planned to vote for a Republican for Congress, and 45% said they planned to vote for a Democrat. Democrats held a 1-point lead last month.”

Pushing abortion rights as a central pillar of Democrat campaigns has been a flop. “Over the past month, the gender gap, which used to favor Democrats, has evaporated. In September, women who identified as independent voters favored Democrats by 14 percentage points. Now, they favor Republicans by 18 points.”

An AP-NORIC poll shows voters trusting Republicans rather than Democrats to do “a better job handling the economy, by 39% to 29%... As the Times’ Jim Tankersley has reported, Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races are barely talking about the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, which included direct payments to citizens.”

Brooks continues to lay on the bad news with a trowel: “Democrats have a crime problem… Democrats have not won back Hispanics. In 2016, Donald Trump won 28% of the Hispanic vote. In 2020, it was up to 38%. This year, as William A. Galston noted in The Wall Street Journal, recent surveys suggest that Republicans will once again win about 34% to 38% of the Hispanic vote. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis is leading Democrat Charlie Crist by 16 points among Hispanics likely to vote… The Jan. 6 committee and the warnings about MAGA fascism didn’t change minds.” Brooksallows that the committee’s work has been morally and legally important. “But Trump’s favorability rating is pretty much where it was at the committee’s first public hearing. In the Times poll, Trump is roughly tied with Biden in a theoretical 2024 rematch. According to Politico, less than 2% of broadcast TV spending in House races has been devoted to Jan. 6 ads.”

A persistent critic of Trump – “The Trumpified GOP deserves to be a marginalized and disgraced force in American life “– Brooks notes that “The Republicans may just have a clearer narrative…  GOP candidates are telling a very clear class/culture/status war narrative in which common-sense Americans are being assaulted by elite progressives who let the homeless take over the streets, teach Sex-Ed to 5-year-olds, manufacture fake news, run woke corporations, open the border, and refuse to do anything about fentanyl deaths and the sorts of things that affect regular people.”

The art of political campaigning is the art of telling a majority of people what they already know, and the data flourished by Brooks suggests that Americans generally are not amenable to solutions that do not solve problems or politicians who, slathering honeyed words on painful problems, appear to believe that words themselves, produced by the cartload in Washington DC, are, like voodoo ceremonies, capable of changing the realities that threaten us.

This is not rational politics. It is the homeopathic magic practiced by primitive tribes in deepest, darkest Washington D.C., the home of high taxes, economic experts, improvident spending and, so far, successful progressive Democrat policies.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...