Skip to main content

An Inflation, Recession Primer For Connecticut

Stefanowski -- Stamford Advocate

As late as August 10, President Joe Biden, who has presided over the worst national economy since stagflation President Jimmy Carter, hit the airwaves to assure a doubtful nation that “the US had ‘zero inflation’ in July. Hours earlier the federal Consumer Price Index data showed annual inflation dipping only slightly to 8.5%, which outraged Republicans and other critics who pointed out it’s still near a four-decade high,” according to the New York Post.

Owing to a severe reduction in future supplies caused partly by Biden’s war on fossil fuel, gas prices rose sharply throughout Biden’s current term as President. According to AAA, Connecticut now ranks 15th in US for highest gas prices: “Today's statewide average for a gallon of self-service regular is $3.42, 11 cents higher than last week and $1.25 higher than last year.

"’Compared to a year ago, it’s costing drivers about $17 more to fill up their vehicles,’ says Fran Mayko, AAA Northeast spokeswoman. ‘Unfortunately, however, it doesn't look like drivers will find relief at the pump any time soon.’"

The law of supply and demand – when demand is a constant, a reduction in supply causes price increases – is inflexible and not susceptible to rhetorical flourishes.

The Lamont administration has responded to the gas shortage crisis by – key word -- temporarily eliminating one of the two taxes the state imposes on fuel. Normal, increased taxation will resume after the 2022 November elections. Traditionally, the Connecticut dominated General Assembly has abided by what is proving to be its unstated principle: “All state tax cuts shall be temporary, all state tax increases shall be permanent.”

State coffers were diminished by gas tax reductions, broadly attributed to an increase in supply engineered by the much derided President Donald Trump Administration. Connecticut currently is running what some consider, during a time of rising consumer prices, an obscene surplus.

Other prices have risen as well. Of note in New England, always subject to winters as frigid as the Democrat dominated General Assembly, average energy prices in Connecticut far outpace national energy prices.

“On average,” Energy Sage reports, “electricity users in Connecticut [emphasis original] spend about $302 per month on electricity. That adds up to $3,624 per year. That’s 31% higher than the national average electric bill of $2,760. The average electric rates in Connecticut cost 26 ¢/kilowatt-hour (kWh), so that means that the average electricity customer in Connecticut is using 1,177 kWh of electricity per month, and 14,124 kWh over the course of the year.”

Inflation was rampant during the late Roman Empire, just before the Goths paid a visit. As far as memory stretches back, inflation has been defined as “too may dollars chasing too few goods,” a definition that has not yet penetrated the concrete skulls of tax and spend Democrats.

Ned  Lamont has been letting the recession cat out of the bag since last July and, in a debate with Republican gubernatorial challenger Bob Stefanowski, who had the temerity to question Lamont’s obscene $5.6 billion surplus at a time when nearly all Connecticut citizens are tightening their belts, Lamont, throwing all caution to the wind, said he would be reluctant to return a significant portion of Connecticut’s surplus to hard pressed taxpayers because, “Maybe we're going to have a surplus at the end of this fiscal year, maybe we're not, but don't spend the surplus we don't have. That's the type of thing that got this state into such a mess over the last 30, 40 years.” Not pausing to explain how one may spend a surplus one doesn’t have, Lamont remarked after the debate, “I did a debate the other day and my opponent [Stefanowski] spent that surplus, you know, five times over. We're heading into what could be a REAL RECESSION [emphasis mine]."

At this point, such a robust denial of Biden’s robust denials – there is no inflation and no recession – should have caused the solid earth in Connecticut to open and swallow Democrats who feverishly cling to every word that falls from the President’s mouth as if they were papal infallibility pronouncements.

Meanwhile, in Massachusetts, formerly called Taxachussetts, outgoing Republican Governor Charlie Baker “filed a fiscal year 2022 closeout budget that sets aside $2.94 billion to be returned to taxpayers and leaves the Legislature about $1.5 billion in surplus dollars to spend,” according to NBC Boston.

Massachusetts passed a statute, 62F, way back in 1986 that tied tax growth to wage growth.

"We are in phenomenal shape," said Administration and Finance Secretary Michael Heffernan. "On 62F, back in 1986, they passed a piece of legislation that if tax collections grew faster than the three-year average of wage growth, you're collecting too much in taxes and you should return it to the taxpayers, and that's exactly what we're going to do."

A similar statute in Connecticut would serve as a retaining wall preventing a spendthrift legislature from collecting unnecessary taxes to spend on unnecessary programs. In addition to enforcing thrift in government, it also would prevent slick politicians from “fooling all the people all the time,” easy to do in a state in which, for the last half century, there has been no enemy to the left.


Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p