 |
| Weicker and Fidel |
"Only a fool learns from his own mistakes. The wise man learns from the mistakes of others" -- Otto von Bismarck
New England – most conspicuously Connecticut and
Massachusetts – has been a school of hard knocks for Republicans who in the
past have been liberal on social issues and conservative on fiscal issues. This
brand, popular for many years in Connecticut and Massachusetts, has not sold in
either state for decades.
The last fiscally conservative, socially liberal U.S. Congressman in Connecticut was Chris Shays, whose politics was a mirror image of that of Republican Party destructor-elect Lowell Weicker, a maverick U.S. Senator for many years whose long run in the U.S. Congress was cut short by then Attorney General of Connecticut, Joe Lieberman.
Wise heads conjectured at the time that Lieberman had bested
Weicker because Lieberman was a Democrat who, like Weicker, was socially liberal
and fiscally conservative – a Jack Kennedy kind of Democrat.
Weicker’s political hero, he often claimed, was Jacob Javits, a Jack Kennedy
Republican – certainly not a conservative.
For the past half century, conservatives had been zeroed out
in Connecticut, and never mind that Bill Buckley, who had introduced conservatism
to the nation through his magazine, National Review, had been a lifelong
resident of Connecticut, a thorn in the side of such as Weicker, a fervent
anti-Reaganite. Buckley called Weicker a gasbag. Weicker regarded Reagan as a
far greater threat to the nation than, say, U.S.S.R. connected Fidel Castro,
the communist maximum leader of Cuba. Reagan referred to Weicker only once in
his published diary -- he said Weicker was a “fathead.”
When Weicker lost his Senate seat to Lieberman, few politically
awake commentators in Connecticut were surprised. Registered Democrats in the
state, then and now, outnumbered Republicans roughly by a two to one margin, a
gap that fully explains Weicker’s political overtures to socially liberal
Democrats. Weicker’s liberal Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) rating in
the Senate during his last years in Congress, was higher than that of liberal Democrat
U.S. Senator Chris Dodd.
Sensing the whiff of postmodern Democrat progressivism in
the wind, a combination of whipped Republicans, fervent Jack Kennedy Democrats, and
politically unaffiliated independents, showed Weicker the door and voted for
Lieberman.
On the opposite side of the aisle, fiscally conservative,
socially liberal Republicans in Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation,
beginning with Nancy Johnson and ending with Shays, were replaced by – how to
put this gently? – fiscally progressive, socially progressive Democrats. The
political moral of the tawdry tale is -- if you are a Republican pretending to
be a Democrat, you will lose to Democrats who have moved sharply to the left.
Jack Kennedy, Bill Buckley, Weicker –and fiscally conservative, socially liberal Republicans -- all have disappeared in puffs of smoke, leaving the political shop in Connecticut to such as progressive Democrats Dannel Malloy, President Pro Tem of the State Senate Martin Looney, and millionaire Democrat Ned Lamont.
Governor of Massachusetts Charlie Baker, perhaps the last Jacob Javits Republican in New England, survived for a bit, but now even he has thrown in the towel. Like Vermont, where socialist Bernie Sanders rules the roost, Massachusetts has gone the way of Connecticut. Republicans, fiscally conservative on economic issues, liberal to moderate on social issues in both states have been vanquished.
The rout in Connecticut, nearly complete, has touched the
U.S. Congressional Delegation, all Democrats, the Constitutional offices in the
state, all Democrats, and the General Assembly, mostly Democrats presided over
by postmodern progressives.
The dead branches on New England’s political tree are fiscally conservative, socially moderate Republicans, clipped in the bud for decades by New England academics, hungry postmodern progressives supported by an uncritical media almost wholly in the camp of the victors, and moderate Republicans, a politically unplugged species in Connecticut.
The live branches on the Democrat side of the political
barricades just now are postmodern progressives, Gramsci cultists, traditional
liberal enemies of the captains of industry, and radical redistributionists
flying, knowingly or not, the flag of postmodern Marxism.
These are not Jack Kennedy’s political heirs. The liberalism of Jack Kennedy exists among some forlorn Democrats in the Northeast only as a consummation devoutly to be wished.
On the right in Connecticut, the conservative branch has put
forth new buds. Both conservatives and libertarians in Connecticut make no
attempts to accommodate their politics to disappearing moderate, fiscally
conservative, socially liberal Republican antecedents. That way, they have
learned from bitter experience, points to the political grave. These relatively new
actors on Connecticut’s political stage are energetic, barely noticed, and tendentiously
misunderstood by nostalgic academics and
old-time political religionists hoping for a resurrection of a once fructifying
liberalism vanquished by postmodern progressivism, which has nothing in common with
the liberal prescriptions recommended by Jack Kennedy in an address to The Economic Club of New York a year before he was assassinated.
Just as Weicker may have been the last Jacob Javits
Republican in New England, so Jack Kennedy may have been the last classical
liberal U.S. President.
You can learn a great deal from history, but you cannot set
up house in the past. Those who do so are doomed to irrelevance, because time
marches on – usually over the prostrate bodies of those who have, as Otto von
Bismarck said, learned from their own mistakes but rendered themselves vulnerable
by refusing to learn from the mistakes of others.
Comments