Skip to main content

Connecticut’s One Party State and the Democrat Party’s Many Mansions

Manchin

The shakers and movers in the national Democrat Party, chiefly speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi of California and Democrat leader in the U.S. Senate Chuck Schumer of New York, knew months before a Congressional vote on President Joe Biden’s “Build Back Better” spending extravaganza that they did not have sufficient members in the Senate to pass the measure, which, not incidentally, would have worsened a growing national debt approaching $30 trillion and stoked the fires of a now raging inflation. Their surprise at the vote is not only surprising; it is a shameless imposture gussied up as a surprise.

The Biden-Pelosi-Schumer Build Back Better plan -- indecently swollen with new spending the cost of which will be passed on to their children and grandchildren, this at a time when much of the nation is still lying prostrate under the boots of COVID-related business shutdowns -- was effectively killed, for the time being, by two moderate Democrats, U.S. Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia and U.S. Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, both of whom are desperately trying to wrest their party from the bloody jaws of their Party’s postmodern progressives.

Manchin especially has been on the enemies list of postmodern progressive Democrats for some time. In a radio interview following the vote, Manchin “lashed out at hardline tactics against him by those he said, [who] ‘Just beat the living crap out of people and think they’ll be submissive,’” according to an Associated Press- New York Times report that appeared in a Hartford paper a few days before Christmas.

“I knew where they were, and I knew what they could and could not do,” Manchin said. “They just never realized it, because they figured, surely to God, we can move one person. Surely we can badger and beat one person up. Surely we can get enough protesters to make that person uncomfortable enough [so that] they’ll just say ‘OK, I’ll vote for anything, just quit.’”

But AOC-Bernie-Sanders progressive Democrats had not taken the full measure of the man. “Well, guess what – I’m from West Virginia. I’m not from where they’re from” -- i.e. U.S. seaboard states such as California , which for the first time in its history has lost a U.S. Congressional seat through outmigration, according to the LA News, and New York, now bidding a bitter farewell to its super-progressive New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio -- “and they can just beat the crap out of people and think they’ll be submissive, period!”

The major tiff between Manchin and the new Democrat Progressive Party conclusively demonstrates that the often cited “Big Tent” Democrat Party of President John Kennedy and, here in Connecticut, of Governors Abe Ribicoff and Ella Grasso, has now become a closed political shop, moderate Democrats like Manchin and Sinema having been muscled out by Congressional leaders such as Pelosi and Schumer, both bending their knees ideologically to Party anarchists U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and socialist U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Moderate Manchin is uncomfortable with borderless spending, and he wants to tie welfare to work requirements, as did Bill Clinton, the last president to have balanced the federal budget.

Like California and New York, Connecticut also has been a one party state for some time – minus an Andrew Cuomo-like governor, who was hustled out of office after it had become clear that his COVID policy had directly caused thousands of deaths in long term care facilities, that he had been a little Napoleon while in office, that he, with some help from his brother Chris Cuomo and an obliging TV network, CNN, had been a super media manipulator, and that, in the post Me-Too period, he had man-handled women.

Here in Connecticut, we may thank our lucky stars that Governor Ned Lamont, halfway competent, is a business man whose ambitions, obscene by the standards of postmodern Democrat progressives and Bernie Sanders socialists, are refreshingly boring. Lamont does not mistake himself for FDR and seems to understand the vital connection between improvident spending and high taxes – just like the much put upon Manchin.

However, the narrow “moderate” corner of the Democrat Party occupied by both Lamont and Manchin is quickly disappearing, nationally and in Connecticut. Increasingly, Democrat moderates in the seaboard states that bracket the nation have been constricted by the progressive boa that appears to be operating on a single principle: that power, which corrupts, does not corrupt absolutely when it is absolute.

In his best moments, Lamont, far less infantile than postmodern progressive Democrats who have crowded out responsible governance, sometimes sounds like Henry David Thoreau’s “party of one.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e