Skip to main content

Connecticut Progressives And The Pharonic State, Who Needs Business?

Samuel Adams, Journalist, Agitator, Son of Liberty

Chief Executive Officers of large Connecticut businesses, one eye always focused on the exit signs, have been used to couching their simmering dissatisfactions with Connecticut’s increasingly progressive government in semi-ambiguous terms, so as not unduly to alarm politicians in the state they may exit, or in the states to which the CEOs, like Moses leading towards a new promised land the captives of a stone-deaf Pharaoh, have migrated in a mass exodus.

Such has been the case with almost every large business in Connecticut that has in the past few decades picked up stakes and moved to some less tax predatory state. In other cases, large Connecticut home grown businesses have been swallowed up by out-of-state buyers, the penultimate step preceding a move by the company – forgive the repetition – to pull up stakes and “move forward,” as the politicians say, to a less tax predatory environment, either out of state or overseas.

Not this time. The messaging by Pitney Bowles CEO Marc Lautenbach admitted of no ambiguity.

We find the following few direct quotes in a top of the fold, front page story plainly titled “Pitney Bowes chief executive warns that businesses may leave Connecticut if the state raises taxes”:

“The chief executive officer of Pitney Bowes Inc. warned state officials Friday that offices emptied by the coronavirus pandemic could be vacated permanently if tax and other policies seen as anti-business prevail.

“’You can tax your way right out of competitiveness as it relates to businesses,’ CEO Marc Lautenbach said at an online economic outlook conference organized by the Connecticut Business & Industry Association. ‘A company like Pitney Bowes has choices.’…

‘There’s a whole new set of possibilities [post pandemic] that are open to companies in terms of how and where work gets done,’ Lautenbach said. ‘That, coupled with what went on from a fiscal perspective ... [with] the states as well as the federal government, should be eye-opening to elected officials.’”

Progressives, both nationally and in-state, have so far shut their eyes to such imprecations.

The much berated Trump administration had stoked the national economy through a series of tax cuts and regulation reductions. Before the Coronavirus pandemic hit American shores and made, in Shakespearian terms, “cowards of us all,” Trump’s business friendly, pro-free market initiatives had produced both jobs aplenty and refreshing organic boosts in state’s revenues, this before President Joe Biden was told he could be a new-age Franklin Delano Roosevelt if he were to give full rein to progressive forces within his party best represented by socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont and progressive sans culottes such as US Senate leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Speaker of the US House Nancy Pelosi. With a blink of an eye, the usurper Trump was out, as were his more successful policies, domestic and foreign.

Both Biden and Connecticut progressives are now in the midst of declaring “a war on cheap energy” – who needs energy? -- as well as those woke CEOs who had hoisted progressives into power by their generous campaign contributions and their sanguine response to anti-business progressive measures. Some Republicans on the right, seeing the light, have drawn away from unthinking support of Big Business and are inclined to allow sanguine CEOs to reap the whirlwind they have sown.

Here in Connecticut, the Republican Party has simply disappeared as a governing force. It took a while for the Connecticut GOP, which rarely offered principled resistance to the state’s leftward zeitgeist on social issues, to fade from view. So called “fiscal conservative and social liberal” Republicans have now been replaced by Democrat progressives who lean far to the left on both fiscal and social issues.               

In deep blue Connecticut and most of the east coast, there is no Moses on the right shouting to a pharaonic state “Let my people go.”

And there is a chilly indifference on the right in blue states to a counter social revolution or, better, a restoration of a sound social order that in the past had lifted the United States from borderline poverty to prosperity.

One of the reasons Republicans in Connecticut can no longer remain fiscally conservative yet socially progressive is that politics is downstream from culture – meaning it is the culture that shapes politics and not, as progressives suppose, politics that shapes culture, a Marxist, Leninist, Stalinist, Fascist notion that, at the cost of much blood, sweat and tears, was buried in the post-World War II years and now threatens to rise from its shallow grave.

What Samuel Adams said to those in his generation who were indifferent to the American experiment in self-government, independence and liberty remains even truer today: “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom—go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”       

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e