Skip to main content

Connecticut Progressives And The Pharonic State, Who Needs Business?

Samuel Adams, Journalist, Agitator, Son of Liberty

Chief Executive Officers of large Connecticut businesses, one eye always focused on the exit signs, have been used to couching their simmering dissatisfactions with Connecticut’s increasingly progressive government in semi-ambiguous terms, so as not unduly to alarm politicians in the state they may exit, or in the states to which the CEOs, like Moses leading towards a new promised land the captives of a stone-deaf Pharaoh, have migrated in a mass exodus.

Such has been the case with almost every large business in Connecticut that has in the past few decades picked up stakes and moved to some less tax predatory state. In other cases, large Connecticut home grown businesses have been swallowed up by out-of-state buyers, the penultimate step preceding a move by the company – forgive the repetition – to pull up stakes and “move forward,” as the politicians say, to a less tax predatory environment, either out of state or overseas.

Not this time. The messaging by Pitney Bowles CEO Marc Lautenbach admitted of no ambiguity.

We find the following few direct quotes in a top of the fold, front page story plainly titled “Pitney Bowes chief executive warns that businesses may leave Connecticut if the state raises taxes”:

“The chief executive officer of Pitney Bowes Inc. warned state officials Friday that offices emptied by the coronavirus pandemic could be vacated permanently if tax and other policies seen as anti-business prevail.

“’You can tax your way right out of competitiveness as it relates to businesses,’ CEO Marc Lautenbach said at an online economic outlook conference organized by the Connecticut Business & Industry Association. ‘A company like Pitney Bowes has choices.’…

‘There’s a whole new set of possibilities [post pandemic] that are open to companies in terms of how and where work gets done,’ Lautenbach said. ‘That, coupled with what went on from a fiscal perspective ... [with] the states as well as the federal government, should be eye-opening to elected officials.’”

Progressives, both nationally and in-state, have so far shut their eyes to such imprecations.

The much berated Trump administration had stoked the national economy through a series of tax cuts and regulation reductions. Before the Coronavirus pandemic hit American shores and made, in Shakespearian terms, “cowards of us all,” Trump’s business friendly, pro-free market initiatives had produced both jobs aplenty and refreshing organic boosts in state’s revenues, this before President Joe Biden was told he could be a new-age Franklin Delano Roosevelt if he were to give full rein to progressive forces within his party best represented by socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont and progressive sans culottes such as US Senate leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Speaker of the US House Nancy Pelosi. With a blink of an eye, the usurper Trump was out, as were his more successful policies, domestic and foreign.

Both Biden and Connecticut progressives are now in the midst of declaring “a war on cheap energy” – who needs energy? -- as well as those woke CEOs who had hoisted progressives into power by their generous campaign contributions and their sanguine response to anti-business progressive measures. Some Republicans on the right, seeing the light, have drawn away from unthinking support of Big Business and are inclined to allow sanguine CEOs to reap the whirlwind they have sown.

Here in Connecticut, the Republican Party has simply disappeared as a governing force. It took a while for the Connecticut GOP, which rarely offered principled resistance to the state’s leftward zeitgeist on social issues, to fade from view. So called “fiscal conservative and social liberal” Republicans have now been replaced by Democrat progressives who lean far to the left on both fiscal and social issues.               

In deep blue Connecticut and most of the east coast, there is no Moses on the right shouting to a pharaonic state “Let my people go.”

And there is a chilly indifference on the right in blue states to a counter social revolution or, better, a restoration of a sound social order that in the past had lifted the United States from borderline poverty to prosperity.

One of the reasons Republicans in Connecticut can no longer remain fiscally conservative yet socially progressive is that politics is downstream from culture – meaning it is the culture that shapes politics and not, as progressives suppose, politics that shapes culture, a Marxist, Leninist, Stalinist, Fascist notion that, at the cost of much blood, sweat and tears, was buried in the post-World War II years and now threatens to rise from its shallow grave.

What Samuel Adams said to those in his generation who were indifferent to the American experiment in self-government, independence and liberty remains even truer today: “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom—go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”       

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...