Skip to main content

DeLauro And Impeachment


Blumenthal and DeLauro
To impeach or not to impeach? That is the question?

Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi has said no. And US Representative Rosa DeLauro, congresswoman for life in the impregnable 3rd District in New Haven County, last held by a Republican 36 years ago, has seconded the motion. DeLauro has occupied her seat, unruffled by Republican challengers, for 28 years.

DeLauro is married to Stan Greenberg, a pollster and consultant whose opinions on things Democrat are held in high esteem by Democrats DeLauro invites to their plush digs in Washington DC. Who says you can’t enrich yourself supping at the public trough?


Greenberg wrote in the Atlantic in 1998, the year the US House impeached President Bill Clinton, that the Republican Party was on the point of collapse because it had been, “trapped by the history it has created… Conservative parties became ascendant because voters scorned the center-left, liberal, and socialist parties that could not manage the transition to a modern post-industrial society.”

In a more recent piece in Politico, “Democrats Are Veering Left: It Might Just Work,” Greenberg  opposes Greenberg’s earlier view: “’Candidates who look like they are cautious, modulating, have their foot on the brake, are missing the moment,’ said veteran Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, who is coming out later this summer with a book on how both parties have been refashioned in the Trump era.

Politico tells us, “The moment, according to Greenberg's polling and focus-group work, has left voters of all stripes clamoring for disruption. Cultural and ideological currents in society—more profound than any given day's Trump uproars—are giving progressives a better opportunity than they have had in decades to play offense.”

What better way to play offense than by being offensively disruptive – the more disruptive the better? And what better way to disrupt than by dangling over the head of Trump a richly deserved Damoclean Sword of impeachment? If presidents could be impeached for bad manners, the guy would be gone tomorrow.

Do not impeach, says wife DeLauro, echoing Pelosi. It is one thing to impeach, an effort that cannot be successful since Republicans control the Senate – for the time being -- and quite another thing to talk-up impeachment. The arrow must not leave the quiver because, if it is shot, it cannot hit the target, and failure in politics can never be regarded as a measure of success. Historians so not wink at failed coup d’états. But the possibility of impeachment, if not unsuccessfully waged, is a potent campaign weapon.

Then too, Trump may always be relied upon to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, by twittering a point to death. The truth is neither he nor anyone in his administration had colluded with Vladimir Putin’s spooks to deprive Hillary Clinton of the presidency. So saith the Delphic Oracle of impeachment, special prosecutor Robert Mueller, in his much thumbed magnum opus. The collusion horse is a dead horse, and the obstruction of justice horse is limping badly. A prequel to the fanciful collusion narrative, now under investigation by John Durham may send both horses to the glue factory.

Durham cannot be as easily dismissed by Connecticut’s U.S. Senators Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy as were Supreme Court justice nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Durham, who bagged crooked cops in Boston and sent former Connecticut Governor John Rowland to the hoosegow for the second time, was recommended for the position of U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut by both senators, and Blumenthal was effusive in his praise of Durham: “I know John Durham well, having known and worked with him over many years. He is a no-nonsense, fierce, fair career prosecutor. He knows what it means to try some of the toughest cases against career criminals. He knows what it means to try to stop the opioid crisis in this country. He knows what organized crime does to the fabric of our society. He is exactly the kind of person we should have in this position.” 

In the meantime, DeLauro and Pelosi are risking the enmity of the four horsewomen of the Democrat political apocalypse, the so called “Squad”:  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan. These four are of less consequence in the long run than the lurch to the left of the Democrat Party. The sudden move towards radical progressivism now on stage at the Democrat presidential primaries has left moderate Democrats and many unaffiliateds stranded on an Island occupied by ancient has-beens such as Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and Rosa DeLauro, all of whom are replaceable – in the long run.

In the short run, radical progressives have been put on a short tether. But it will not be long here in Connecticut, the canary in the progressive minefield, before Blumenthal and Murphy feel comfortable enough to wink at the destruction of the state’s insurance industry and the utter destruction of the nation’s smelly capitalist orthodoxies under the hammer blows of Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal. It’s only a matter of time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...