Skip to main content

Blumenthal… Wakey, Wakey…


Someone should nudge awake Connecticut U.S. Senators Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy. The FISA warrant used to secure the services of special prosecutor Robert Mueller was defective from the get-go, we learn in a series of stunning opinion pieces in The Hill written by John Solomon. It appears there is an after-story to the Mueller investigation after all, and the second act will almost certainly disappoint the two Trump-slayers.

One of the stories’ ledes probably should garner Solomon a Pulitzer for commentary eye-candy: “The FBI’s sworn story to a federal court about its asset, Christopher Steele, is fraying faster than a $5 souvenir T-shirt bought at a tourist trap.” And the second graph might be a close runner-up: “Newly unearthed memos show a high-ranking government official who met with Steele in October 2016 determined some of the Donald Trump dirt that Steele was simultaneously digging up for the FBI and for Hillary Clinton’s campaign was inaccurate, and likely leaked to the media.”

Dates are important. Trump did not become president-elect until November 8, 2016, much to the dismay of the Friends of Hillary Clinton, Blumenthal among them.  Had Clinton defeated Trump, the “dossier” on the president might never have seen the light of day. Certainly, the dossier would not have clanged through the first two years of the Trump presidency like a warning fire bell.  

“The concerns [over the dossier] were flagged in a typed memo and in handwritten notes taken by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec on Oct. 11, 2016,” more than two months before Trump was sworn in as President, Solomon writes.

It is not improbable that worry lines appeared on the usual placid brow of Blumenthal when Trump laid his hand on the Bible and swore as President to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

A band of brothers in the Obama administration knew very early on that the misnamed Steele “dossier” – an opposition research document full of campaign dirt, the more salacious parts entirely fictional – was seriously defective as a court document intended to convince a FISA court judge.

“It is important to note,” Solomon writes, “that the FBI swore on Oct. 21, 2016, to the FISA judges that Steele’s ‘reporting has been corroborated and used in criminal proceedings’ and the FBI has determined him to be ‘reliable’ and was ‘unaware of any derogatory information pertaining’ to their informant, who simultaneously worked for Fusion GPS, the firm paid by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Clinton campaign to find Russian dirt on Trump. Her [Kavalec’s] observations were recorded exactly 10 days before the FBI used Steele and his infamous dossier to justify securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and the campaign’s contacts with Russia in search of a now debunked collusion theory.”

The collusion theory was debunked, finally, by special prosecutor Robert Muller, but Muller’s mandate did not permit him to investigate the origins of what some are calling an attempted presidential coup.

If Blumenthal were operating on the Republican side of the barricades, does anyone doubt he would be overjoyed at the news that Attorney General William Barr has chosen a Connecticut prosecutor, John Durham, to investigate how a FISA court was misled by Steele and possible co-conspirators, some of them Russian from whom Steele received his mud-balls, and others – dare it be said? – clustered around Clinton’s shattered presidential attempt? Murphy, were he a Republican, would be barking at Blumenthal’s side. According to both the New York Times and the Associated Press, Durham’s probe will focus on whether the Justice Department lawfully collected intelligence on Trump campaign associates.

It’s going to be nearly impossible for Connecticut’s two US Senators to soil the reputation of Durham before he turns up some inconvenient truths about the Trump collusion prequel. Durham comes to the post highly recommended by, among others, Blumenthal. It was Blumenthal and Murphy who recommended Durham to Trump as Connecticut’s US Attorney. Blumenthal's recommendation swelled with unstinted praise: “I know John Durham well, having known and worked with him over many years. He is a no-nonsense, fierce, fair career prosecutor. He knows what it means to try some of the toughest cases against career criminals. He knows what it means to try to stop the opioid crisis in this country. He knows what organized crime does to the fabric of our society. He is exactly the kind of person we should have in this position.”

And – cherry on the cake -- Durham bagged crooked FBI agents in Boston, as well as the notorious former Governor of Connecticut John Rowland.

As Aaron once said to the Pharaoh of Egypt about Moses, “What’s not to like?”

Comments

Ned Kelly said…
Another great article mate!

James Oliver said…
Why should Blumenthal care if the FiSA warrants were obtained using false affidavits. That was a technique used by his office in Connecticut for many years. Even when that practice was exposed he was unapplolgetic about the practice. Good men may expose this FISA abuse but I doubt anything will happen. It is more likely that the good men exposing the FISA abuse will be attacked and have their lives destroyed. Lets see what happens to Mr. Durham if he pursues these abuses. My bet is he will be attacked and destroyed. In the end, even for you Mr. Pesci it is just another story - just a way to make a living. If Durham was smart he would just walk away now.
Anonymous said…
Why do you think for one second that Blumenthal cares about FISA warrant abuses. While Connecticut AG his office used defective or false affidavits to obtain attachments of the property of Connecticut citizens. His office never showed any remorse for those policies. Good men stood up to those abuses only to have the State machinery turned on them. They were attacked and destroyed without one word from you or any other members of the Press. If Durham is going to try and enforce the law he should be prepared to be attacked on both a Federal and State level and to have his career and reputation destroyed. He is dealing with very powerful and very corrupt forces. Where will you be when that happens - just on to the next story.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p