Former US Senator and Governor Lowell Weicker – now retired from public
affairs and living the life in Old Lyme – once again has stepped forward on the public
stage to tell Republicans in Connecticut
what they must do to save themselves from the destruction wrought upon their
party by Lowell Weicker, among others.
The first thing they must do is to abandon the ideas of former President
Ronald Reagan and embrace the ideas of Mr. Weicker. And of course if
Republicans in his overtaxed and over-regulated tottering state saw fit to
nominate for public office people just like Mr. Weicker, that would be a cherry
on the state’s cake. And, oh yes – let us not forget – Mr. Weicker and his
enablers on the Hartford Courant’s editorial board want the Connecticut GOP to open its primary
doors to unaffiliateds.
Republicans in Connecticut, Mr. Weicker told the Courant, are quite
literally insane, because they are always doing the same thing and expecting a
different result, Einstein’s definition of insanity.
“The ‘same thing’ in your case,” Mr. Weicker
told the Courant, “is losing elections by trying to duplicate the GOP of the
Reagan years. Moderate Republicanism was successful until William F. Buckley
and the tea party conservatives staged their Trojan horse coup. It's time to
broaden the tent by changing party rules permitting unaffiliated voters to vote
in Republican primaries. Republicans had that rule once, sanctioned by the
Supreme Court, only to have conservatives toss it and attain greater exclusivity
resulting in greater vulnerability.”
Let’s examine these over masticated “ideas.”
The Tea Party – not really a “party,” but
rather a spontaneous reaction in Connecticut to years of progressive rule
culminating in the largest tax increases in Connecticut history, an income tax
authored by Mr. Weicker and yet another broad based tax increase authored by
present Governor Dannel Malloy – has little or nothing to do with the present shape
of politics in Connecticut. The Tea Party counter revolution is too recent in
the state to have produced any positive legislative results.
While it is true Mr. Weicker’s bete noir Bill
Buckley, the father of the post-World War II American conservative movement,
did play a back stage role in ridding the US Senate of Mr. Weicker, Mr.
Buckley’s political influence reaped a much larger harvest elsewhere in the
nation. Republicans reclaimed the US Senate in the
last election and now control both houses of Congress. In the aftermath of the
Reagan revolution elsewhere in the country, Republicans now have the largest
majority in the US House since World War II, and they control 31 state legislatures, 11 of which are controlled by Democrats, not a bad haul.
Meanwhile, in the land of steady habits,
conservativism has left no imprint on the Connecticut Republican Party, which
has continued to be decimated by progressives. Mr. Weicker cannot name more
than a handful of prominent Republican office holders who are boastfully
conservative. In Connecticut’s US Congressional delegation, all moderate
Republican office holders have been replaced by progressive Democrats: Nancy
Johnson, Chris Shays, and Rob Simmons, all of whom served in the Congress with
Weicker, were MODERATE REPUBLICANS. This is not to say Mr. Weicker was in any
sense a moderate.
As US Senator and the nominal head of his
party in Connecticut, Weicker avoided campaigning conspicuously for GOP members
of the state’s US Congressional delegation. Weicker himself was an uber-liberal
Republican. Really -- he was. Any of the
political columnists writing at the time easily could have looked it up, if
they so wished. Indeed, according to Americans for Democratic Action, a liberal
rating service, Weicker was, in ADA’s 1986 rankings, 20 percentage points MORE
liberal than fellow Democratic Senator Chris Dodd. Weicker called himself,
approvingly, “the turd in the Republican Party punchbowl” and reverenced his
own bristly, maverick brand.
There was no effective opposition to Senator
Weicker in Connecticut among active conservative Connecticut politicians,
largely because nearly all active Republican politicians during Weicker’s
twenty year reign were moderates.
The coup against US Senator Weicker was
brought on largely by Mr. Weicker. In the end, Mr. Weicker was tossed aside by
a) Democrats who decided to vote for a real liberal Democrat, former US Senator
Joe Lieberman, rather than a liberal Jacob Javits Republican, and b)
Connecticut Republicans whose ribs had been battered for years by a maverick
who had been using his own party as a foil to secure election in a state in
which Democrats outnumbered moderate Republicans by a margin of two to one.
Now that Mr. Weicker has been evacuated, the
Republican Party in Connecticut may develop organically. In time -- if the
party does not succumb to Mr. Weicker’s latest attempt to blow it up by opening
its primaries to unaffiliateds -- the GOP in Connecticut might even elect a
non-progressive Republican governor, as did Massachusetts, formerly known as
Taxachussetts.
Comments
--------------
Speaking as a conservative, I'm not that keen on being identified as TeaParty. Violent demonstrations against the British mother country in violation of good manners more of a left-wing mob thing. In any case, as you say, there is no organization. There has been on occasion a more or less vocal patriotic criticism of out of control (i.e., extra-constitutional) government and its extreme mismanagement. If the Republican Party can't get on board with the Constitution(s), at least it should open its eyes to the political opportunities represented by a broad popular anger at the mismanagement. I am sure that the public has only a general understanding of the mess (and the untruth campaign required to maintain it). A patriotic and ambitious politician might do himself and all of us some good with an ongoing truth campaign that gets graphic.
Ken Dixon does a nice job of putting on display some of the frivolous-yet-expensive activities of our State government. You can't convince me that a political party couldn't exploit the fact that the taxpayers fund a Director of an "Asian Pacific American Commission" to the tune of $109,000. Or, a "Director of Program Review" (PR&I) at $190,000. Does the Maverick or his party, whichever one he may grace with his membership, have any problem forcing our kids to pay for this stuff?
http://blog.ctnews.com/dixon/2015/02/05/capitol-salary-porn-2015-where-jealousy-meets-envy/
-------------
But, about Chris Shays...
Speaking as a "teaparty" guy I had no problem voting for Chris Shays over Linda McMahon. He is an old fashioned liberal Republican, but, unlike the Maverick, he's patriotic and intellectually honest.