Skip to main content

Weicker The Destroyer

Former US Senator and Governor Lowell Weicker – now retired from public affairs and living the life in Old Lyme  – once again has stepped forward on the public stage to tell  Republicans in Connecticut what they must do to save themselves from the destruction wrought upon their party by Lowell Weicker, among others.

The first thing they must do is to abandon the ideas of former President Ronald Reagan and embrace the ideas of Mr. Weicker. And of course if Republicans in his overtaxed and over-regulated tottering state saw fit to nominate for public office people just like Mr. Weicker, that would be a cherry on the state’s cake. And, oh yes – let us not forget – Mr. Weicker and his enablers on the Hartford Courant’s editorial board want the Connecticut GOP to open its primary doors to unaffiliateds.

Republicans in Connecticut, Mr. Weicker told the Courant, are quite literally insane, because they are always doing the same thing and expecting a different result, Einstein’s definition of insanity.

“The ‘same thing’ in your case,” Mr. Weicker told the Courant, “is losing elections by trying to duplicate the GOP of the Reagan years. Moderate Republicanism was successful until William F. Buckley and the tea party conservatives staged their Trojan horse coup. It's time to broaden the tent by changing party rules permitting unaffiliated voters to vote in Republican primaries. Republicans had that rule once, sanctioned by the Supreme Court, only to have conservatives toss it and attain greater exclusivity resulting in greater vulnerability.”

Let’s examine these over masticated “ideas.”

The Tea Party – not really a “party,” but rather a spontaneous reaction in Connecticut to years of progressive rule culminating in the largest tax increases in Connecticut history, an income tax authored by Mr. Weicker and yet another broad based tax increase authored by present Governor Dannel Malloy – has little or nothing to do with the present shape of politics in Connecticut. The Tea Party counter revolution is too recent in the state to have produced any positive legislative results.

While it is true Mr. Weicker’s bete noir Bill Buckley, the father of the post-World War II American conservative movement, did play a back stage role in ridding the US Senate of Mr. Weicker, Mr. Buckley’s political influence reaped a much larger harvest elsewhere in the nation. Republicans reclaimed the US Senate in the last election and now control both houses of Congress. In the aftermath of the Reagan revolution elsewhere in the country, Republicans now have the largest majority in the US House since World War II, and they control 31 state legislatures, 11 of which are controlled by Democrats, not a bad haul.

Meanwhile, in the land of steady habits, conservativism has left no imprint on the Connecticut Republican Party, which has continued to be decimated by progressives. Mr. Weicker cannot name more than a handful of prominent Republican office holders who are boastfully conservative. In Connecticut’s US Congressional delegation, all moderate Republican office holders have been replaced by progressive Democrats: Nancy Johnson, Chris Shays, and Rob Simmons, all of whom served in the Congress with Weicker, were MODERATE REPUBLICANS. This is not to say Mr. Weicker was in any sense a moderate.

As US Senator and the nominal head of his party in Connecticut, Weicker avoided campaigning conspicuously for GOP members of the state’s US Congressional delegation. Weicker himself was an uber-liberal Republican. Really -- he was.  Any of the political columnists writing at the time easily could have looked it up, if they so wished. Indeed, according to Americans for Democratic Action, a liberal rating service, Weicker was, in ADA’s 1986 rankings, 20 percentage points MORE liberal than fellow Democratic Senator Chris Dodd. Weicker called himself, approvingly, “the turd in the Republican Party punchbowl” and reverenced his own bristly, maverick brand.

There was no effective opposition to Senator Weicker in Connecticut among active conservative Connecticut politicians, largely because nearly all active Republican politicians during Weicker’s twenty year reign were moderates.

The coup against US Senator Weicker was brought on largely by Mr. Weicker. In the end, Mr. Weicker was tossed aside by a) Democrats who decided to vote for a real liberal Democrat, former US Senator Joe Lieberman, rather than a liberal Jacob Javits Republican, and b) Connecticut Republicans whose ribs had been battered for years by a maverick who had been using his own party as a foil to secure election in a state in which Democrats outnumbered moderate Republicans by a margin of two to one.

Now that Mr. Weicker has been evacuated, the Republican Party in Connecticut may develop organically. In time -- if the party does not succumb to Mr. Weicker’s latest attempt to blow it up by opening its primaries to unaffiliateds -- the GOP in Connecticut might even elect a non-progressive Republican governor, as did Massachusetts, formerly known as Taxachussetts.


peter brush said…
Chris Shays
Speaking as a conservative, I'm not that keen on being identified as TeaParty. Violent demonstrations against the British mother country in violation of good manners more of a left-wing mob thing. In any case, as you say, there is no organization. There has been on occasion a more or less vocal patriotic criticism of out of control (i.e., extra-constitutional) government and its extreme mismanagement. If the Republican Party can't get on board with the Constitution(s), at least it should open its eyes to the political opportunities represented by a broad popular anger at the mismanagement. I am sure that the public has only a general understanding of the mess (and the untruth campaign required to maintain it). A patriotic and ambitious politician might do himself and all of us some good with an ongoing truth campaign that gets graphic.
Ken Dixon does a nice job of putting on display some of the frivolous-yet-expensive activities of our State government. You can't convince me that a political party couldn't exploit the fact that the taxpayers fund a Director of an "Asian Pacific American Commission" to the tune of $109,000. Or, a "Director of Program Review" (PR&I) at $190,000. Does the Maverick or his party, whichever one he may grace with his membership, have any problem forcing our kids to pay for this stuff?
peter brush said…
Chris Shays
But, about Chris Shays...
Speaking as a "teaparty" guy I had no problem voting for Chris Shays over Linda McMahon. He is an old fashioned liberal Republican, but, unlike the Maverick, he's patriotic and intellectually honest.

Popular posts from this blog

Blumenthal the Hare

Blumenthal, Biden In the campaign season now upon us, money is, more than ever, the mother’s milk of politics. U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal, we all know, is rich in every sense of the word. He is a multi-millionaire who lives in splendor in Greenwich, Connecticut, a billionaire’s Eden. And he, as well as other Democrat U.S. Congresspersons, also redundantly rich – such as 3 rd District U.S. Representatives Rosa DeLauro, first elected to the U.S. House of Representatives more than three decades ago in 1990, and 4 th District U.S. Representative Jim Himes, now enjoying his seventh term in office – is able at the drop of a hat to assemble a formidable campaign war chest that will serve to discourage primary opponents and assure an effortless glide path to victory. In addition to personal wealth, Blumenthal is also rich in mostly flattering news reports, many of which he or his staff had a hand in creating through carefully crafted news releases not always critically examined by Conn

Connecticut, An Embarrassment Of Riches

The Lamont Family On the one hand, Connecticut Democrats have for years had a love/hate relationship with the rich. Not a few Democrat Jeremiahs have let loose on the rich over the years, partly in order to claim solidarity with the more numerous middle class. In our progressive post-Marxian leftist universe, class is still king. The rich, by simply being rich, are still regarded in leftist quarters as oppressors of the proletariat. Connecticut’s “Gold Coast,” a parcel of well-endowed rich people stretching snake-like along the state’s southern coastline, fairly glows with wealth. Greenwich is wealth central, and a few Democrat politicians live in the glorious gilded bubble, far from the madding crown. U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal and Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont, both of whom will be heading the Democrat ticket in the midterm elections, live in Greenwich. Other Democrat U.S. Congressional millionaires are U.S. Representatives Jim Himes, who also lives in Greenwich, and Democr

Blumenthal, Biden, And Postmodern Utopians

Blumenthal People are noticing the drop in U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s approval rating. According to a recent Quinnipiac poll, Blumenthal’s approval has dipped into a danger-red area. “The job approval of U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, who is seeking a third term this fall, CTMirror reports, “was his worst in Quinnipiac polling since the Democrat took office in 2011. He was barely above water: 45% approve while 43% disapprove.” Coincidentally, the approval rating of President Joe Biden , which ranges from 36% to 43%, is underwater. The New York Post , every postmodern progressive’s bete noir , suggests that Biden’s reactionary economic policies may lie at the root of his disfavor, but these roots may go deeper than anyone supposes. “President Biden,” a Post commentator writes, has dismissed inflation worries, “saying that Milton Friedman — the famed inflation-fighting economist — no longer runs the show. Well, the late economist certainly didn’t run Biden’s show, but his obs