Skip to main content

Malloy’s Time


Governor Dannel Malloy has more or less appointed himself as a national progressive Democratic attack dog, according to an interview with Time magazine: “Seizing an opportunity in a party depleted of household names not Clinton or Obama, Malloy is rising to the occasion, positioning himself as one of the party’s top attack dogs as the 2016 cycle approaches.”

Hailing from Connecticut, where much of the media has placidly accepted Mr. Malloy’s progressive tax and spend program, there are no attack dogs on the left, and so Mr. Malloy has been permitted to range freely, biting whomever he chooses.


Time mentions a few of his victims: Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey is one of Mr. Malloy’s favorite Kong toys. “Such a charitable man,” Malloy said of Christie, his tongue tucked in his cheek. “He has spread goodwill to so many places. He’s really quite remarkable, isn’t he?” Once having described a remark made by Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal as “the most insane statement I’ve ever heard,” Mr. Malloy was barely able to contain himself as he said Mr. Jindal would be the “toughest one to beat in the Republican field.”

In the face of rather astounding losses – the Republican Party in the last national elections captured the U.S. Senate, having previously captured the US House. Republicans now command 31 of the country’s state houses, “near a high water mark in the modern era,” said the Washington Post in an after-election analysis. Republicans now also control 67 partisan legislative chambers across the country, "five more than their previous record in the modern era, set after special elections in 2011 and 2012."

Mr. Malloy fears Democrats might become a “Republican lite” party. Addressing the winter meeting of the Association of State Democratic Chairs, the chair-designate of the Democratic Governors Association hectored his audience: “When we run as Republican-lite we lose; let us be Democrats once again,” a call to arms that produced a standing ovation.

It must be obvious to everyone but Mr. Malloy that Republicans running as “Republicans lite” in the last election made remarkable forward progress. They beat, for the most part, Democrats who had supported Barack Obama, the most progressive Democrat in living memory whose watchword was “We are the ones we have been waiting for.” Mr. Malloy greeted the arrival of the progressive future with loud and continuing hosannas.

Mr. Malloy, who marches in strike lines and who imposed on Connecticut the largest tax increases in state history, certainly is no shrinking moderate. In Connecticut, what used to be called the vital moderate center of the Democratic Party has all but disappeared. Democrats in the Nutmeg State are all progressives now. The state Republican Party continues to flirt with moderation -- the head honchos at the state central have now assigned a committee the onerous task of reviewing the possibility of opening Republican Party primaries to unaffiliateds -- now that all of its grey-haired moderates have fallen to the hob-nailed boots of progressives.

Mr. Malloy’s admissions to Time are the exact opposite of the truth.  Nationally, Democrats fell to Republicans in the last election because they had eagerly embraced Mr. Obama’s progressive programs. In his own state, weak-tea Republican fell to progressive Democrats --  to be sure by slim margins, but it only takes one vote beyond fifty percent to make a governor.

Conservatism in Connecticut is not a doctrine that has been tried and found wanting; it has never been tried, which is why the state is in dismal condition. High taxes transfer entrepreneurial capital from businesses to government functionaries who seriously suppose they can “invest” capital more profitably than the capitalists. Connecticut's crony capitalist governor already has thrown away a good deal of the state’s tax haul bribing national and international business to remain in a state that will flog them with high taxes and burdensome regulations.

Surely the Republican Party in Connecticut can convince everyone – students who will leave the state in search of greener pastures elsewhere, carrying with them their very expensive sheepskins, businesses that reflexively contribute to the winning campaigns of the floggers, the employees of small businesses shuttered because the progressive Democratic dominated General Assembly is adamantly  unwilling to entertain real spending cuts, the poor in Connecticut whose vital programs will be shaved by a government desperate to survive yet another fiscal year without alienating state employees  -- that conservative prescriptions will work as well in Connecticut as they have in, just to mention one burgeoning state, Texas, whose governor, Rick Perry, Mr. Malloy has often held up to ridicule. But the state Republican Party would have to move off its “moderate” political dime to do this.


And, mired in moderation, it won’t. It just won’t.    

Comments

peter brush said…
Mr. Malloy was unattractive when he ran the first time. At this point he turns the stomach. He may not be as destructive as our Presidente, but he resembles Mr. Obama in lacking any concern for public policy except to the extent that it may promote the interests of his political party. The object is to have some stuff to make rhetorical use of for self-branding of Dems and mindless labeling of Republicans. What policies is the electorate to associate with real, ideologically committed Democrats? Who knows? He's taking back his tax credits to corporations like ESPN. He says he thinks the State should operate on Keynseian principles, but now the Dem Treasurer is complaining about his borrowing being "too aggressive." How about public sector unions? Should real Dems fight against the extreme, anti-labor, Walker Republicans? How about nationalizing public sector unions under the rubric of "civil rights?" I haven't heard Mr. Malloy bragging about the bus-way lately, nor, for that matter, about train service.
Aren't those Republicans hostile to public transportation?
-------------------
We increased the minimum wage – the first in the nation to commit to ten dollars and ten cents per hour.

We passed paid sick leave – the first in America to do it.
---------------
Senator Joe Markley and Representative Rob Sampson will be hosting their second Google Hangout on Wednesday February 25th at 6:30 p.m. The legislators will be joined by in-house legislative budget analyst Lisa Hammersley to discuss the Governor’s budget proposal and what it means for Connecticut families, employers, and the state’s long term fiscal health.
Governor Malloy’s budget contains over $900 million in new tax revenues, makes major cuts to the social safety net, and still requires the state to borrow $300 million to balance out.
peter brush said…
“No one in his right mind could question that the president loves America,” Malloy said, and criticized potential GOP presidential candidates for failing to denounce Giuliani, saying their silence “speaks volumes.”
-------------
Are there any Nutmeg subsidies out of compassion for us? Can I get a handicapped parking placard for my truck because my cling is bitter? Would it make it easier if I were to expand upon Giuliani's excellent, if tardy, proclamations by putting forth the thesis that not only does President Pen-and-Phone not love the country, but he loathes it along with the rest of Western Civilization? (If I can't get the goodies without a social worker coming to the homestead, than I'll take a pass.)
---------------
Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl could have a tax-free $350,000 dropped into his bank account if the current investigation into his disappearance from his base in Afghanistan was not desertion

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p