Skip to main content

Mr. Netanyahu Goes To Washington


It appears that Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, the sole democracy in the Middle East, will be addressing Congress after all on March 3rd. The US Congress has been called the greatest deliberative democratic body on earth, and so here is a match that appears to have been made in Heaven. What then is the problem?

Dick Blumenthal, as of this writing, is pretending not to know. Connecticut’s first consumer protection U.S. Senator has dropped into his Hamlet mode and has not yet made up his mind whether he’ll attend Mr. Netanyahu’s address. Said Mr. Blumenthal, “Well, I’m here as the senator from Connecticut, and I have to make a decision about what serves the national interest. And obviously I am Jewish, so I will be inclined to go but I, you know, have to make a decision on what I think is the right thing to do,” and “I certainly have respect for the head of the state of Israel and out of that respect I could go. But the invitation and the acceptance were very unfortunately done.”


In non-Newspeak this means: Mr. Netanyahu did not secure permission from President Barack Obama to speak to the US Congress on matters important to his nation. Some congressmen, but not Mr. Hamlet from Connecticut, may be asking themselves: So what? Must the President approve everyone who wishes to address the US Congress? And why is presidential approval necessary in this case?

The President and all the President’s men say that Mr. Netanyahu’s address is likely to upset delicate negotiations now underway between the President and Iran. But this objection seems silly. Mr. Netanyahu’s view of Iran, a client state of Russian President Vladimir Putin, vanquisher of Ukraine, is well known; it has been announced from a thousand rooftops; it has been published in hundreds of news outlets, including the New York Times. How often have we heard Mr. Netanyahu say publicly that he would do anything and everything to prevent Iran, fast becoming a regional power in the Middle East, from deploying nuclear weapons? Mr. Obama, much in the habit of drawing red lines in desert sand that the winds of war obscure, says he has similar ambitions.   

Owing to a major story in the New York Times, it had been thought that Mr. Netanyahu and Speaker of the US House John Boehner between themselves had arranged the assignation without telling the Obama administration. Almost immediately after the Times story had appeared, the paper ran a correction that torpedoed the thrust of its own story: An earlier version of this article misstated when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel accepted Speaker John A. Boehner’s invitation to address Congress. He accepted after the administration had been informed of the invitation, not before.”  Sorry, said the Times, the White House WAS advised of the invitation. It was as if the Times had run a story saying “the sky is falling” and then appended to the story a “correction” that said “the sky is NOT falling; however, it IS raining.”

“Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it,” Jonathan Swift wrote in 1710, “so that when Men come to be undeceiv’d, it is too late; the Jest is over, and the Tale has had its Effect.” And though the attribution has been questioned, Mark Twain easily could have said “A lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on.”

Mr. Obama will not be attending the address, and some of his critics are speculating that his absence will be attributed to a pending golf game or yet another costly family vacation. Vice President Joe Biden, who regularly presides over joint sessions of Congress, has said he will not be able to attend the event owing to an unspecified trip abroad. While in Germany, Mr. Biden found time to meet with Mr.  Netanyahu's chief political rival, Israeli opposition leader Isaac Herzog. A widely read Jewish Newspaper, Haaretz, has reported that “The group V15, which denies that its motto is ‘anyone but Bibi,’ is working with U.S. political strategist Jeremy Bird to replace the government in March.” Other reports indicate that OneVoice International, a US based activist group, has partnered with V15 and that Jeremy Bird, former national field director for President Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign, “is also reportedly involved in the effort.”

The electorate in Israel is fairly sophisticated – and it may be better informed than boycotting congressmen concerning underhanded attempts to affect elections in Israel. For his part, Mr. Netanyahu has plainly said he will be coming to Washington to warn the greatest deliberative body on earth that Iran MUST be prevented from producing a nuclear weapon that would forever change the delicate balance of power in the Middle East. Congressmen teetering on the fence should give him an honest hearing.    

Comments

peter brush said…
Iran MUST be prevented from producing a nuclear weapon that would forever change the delicate balance of power in the Middle East
-------------
Our President and his Party are no more capable of understanding the threat posed by Iran than they are appreciating that Medicare is unsustainable. They hear the words "threat" and "unsustainable," but the facts described are so contrary to the Leftie worldview that the words don't sink in. We will be well served if Netanyahu provokes us to attention.
I'm afraid, however, that such a speech will be useless in getting Obama to do anything or help the Israelis do anything. Sanctions can raise the cost to the Iranians of going forward, but apparently won't stop them. The Commander in Chief is unwilling to act, and insists on a never ending charade of negotiation regardless of facts on the ground. Israel may be as isolated as it has ever been, and is forced to deal with Iran alone. In fact, it may be that all the speech may practically achieve is to put pressure on the Administration not to condemn any Israeli unilateral action.

In the mean time, Obama is hoping to hide behind an "authorization" to continue to use inadequate force against the Islamic State. My hope is that Congress will deny him any such authorization. He is clearly not serious, and is perfectly willing to put our guys in harm's way without any understanding of our national interests or the interests of the people(s) of the Middle East. He has a pen and a phone. He doesn't need consent from the American People to do whatever he deems in the interest of the International Community. Any authority he is given will simply serve to conceal his own failures and allow him to shift the blame to those rascally Republicans.
------------
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNION OF SOCIALIST SOVIET REPUBLICS
PART I DECLARATION
Since the foundation of the Soviet Republics, the states of the world have been divided into two camps: the camp of capitalism and the camp of socialism. There, in the camp of capitalism: national hate and inequality, colonial slavery and chauvinism, national oppression and massacres, brutalities and imperialistic wars. Here, in the camp of socialism: reciprocal confidence and peace, national liberty and equality, the pacific co-existence and fratemal collaboration of peoples.


Obama received 70% of the American Jewish vote BOTH times; even after insulting Netanyahu and showing his contempt for Israel I wonder what they're thinking now that Obama is sending those who ran his campaign to in terfere in Israel's elections to defeat Netanyahu?

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p