Skip to main content

Suzio: "Lawlor Illegal Member Of Victim Advocate Advisory Committee"

 
Says law specifies that Victim Advocate is to be Independent from other state agencies
Lawlor wants new Victim Advocate to be “Rubber Stamp” for “Early Release” Scandal
 
 
Former State Senator Len Suzio, Connecticut's leading critic of the Early Release program, said Mike Lawlor should not serve on the Victim Advisory Committee because of his role in advocating for the Early Release of violent criminals from Connecticut prisons.  Also, Connecticut law makes him ineligible for membership – “he never should have been appointed by the Governor in the first place”, Suzio said.
 
"The Early Release Law, of which Mike Lawlor is the chief architect and defender, is an outrageous violation of the rights of crime victims and their families. Under the Early Release law, thousands of violent criminals have been released or discharged prematurely from prison, free to maraud and free to murder innocent citizens and free to terrorize their victims," said Suzio.
 
Suzio  stated that State law prohibits Lawlor from serving on the Committee. "The legislature intended the Office of Victim Advocate to be an 'independent' office and explicitly states, 'the Victim Advocate shall act independently (emphasis added) of any state department in the performance of the Advocate's duties' (see Section 46a-13(b)).  The statute is very clear, 'No member of the advisory committee shall be a person who is a volunteer for, a board member of, or is employed by any entity or agency subject to the review of, or evaluation or monitoring by the Victim Advocate . . .' (Sec. 46a-13h) Clearly Mike Lawlor runs  a division whose policies and practices have a history of being criticized and objected to by the Victim Advocate. In fact, Mike Lawlor used his role on the Advisory Committee to effectively fire previous Victim Advocate, Michelle Cruz, who had independently criticized Lawlor's Early Release law as an abuse of Victims' rights. That is why I call upon Mike Lawlor to resign from the Committee today" Suzio said.
 
 
"I also call upon the Advisory Committee to hold public hearings on the process by which a new Victim Advocate will be selected. Thousands of Connecticut crime victims and their families are served by the Victim Advocate. They should have a say in how the most highly qualified candidates for Victim Advocate are determined. We need to assure that only the most highly qualified and independent person is hired to represent their interests. 
 
Len Suzio is a member of the Victim Advocate Advisory Committee.
 
Contact: Len Suzio (203)-530-1544

Comments

Dani said…
"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny" (James Madison, Federalist No. 48, Feb. 1, 1788).
Anonymous said…
Don,
It seems that this is the norm lately in CT. I have asked Governor Malloy and the attorney general George Jepsen to review an issue involving the Office of State Ethics and their Citizens' Ethics Advisory Board and their incorrect application of a statute and the terms of the Code of Ethics. They brought ethics charges against me under Chapter 1 Volume 10 of the Code of Ethics charging that I was a state employee by definition under I-79 m which defines a "state employee"-who can by statute be fined if a violation is found-problem is that I did not fit the definition of a state employee under the code, nor a lobbyist or public official. No matter they conducted their puppet show with two board members (one being Shawn Wooden now challenging Eric Coleman for his Senate seat) who was ineligible to be seated. He resigned after voting but failed to state that he was ineligible to vote or to address the issue which he was aware of -that according to the statute since 1979 (P.A 79-493) I should not nor could not legally have been brought before this body. Nor could a penalty under I-88 a (3) be imposed against me if I did not fit the definition according to I-79 of "state employee" lobbyist or public official by statute.The fact that the OAG under the former AG Richard Blumenthal with held exculpatory evidence vital to my defense until after the hearing concluded which would have exonerated me only added to my disappointment in CT leadership. I have yet to hear from Governor Malloy on this illegal application of a statute nor from Mr.Jepsen on the actions of his office prior to him taking his oath and the actions of the OSE and CEAB. When Mr.Jepsen took office he then complied with the long pending Freedom of Information request and released the document with held by his predecessor. The CEAB and OSE said too bad, we won??

Maybe Senator Suzio will be more successful seeking their attention. For me, I am still waiting to see if our governor cares how the OSE and CEAB function or whether our attorney general will turn a blind eye now that it has been brought to his attention again. May be they are all too busy with their upcoming re-election campaigns.

Hopefully at least the voters in Hartford will have an opportunity in August to question Shawn Wooden as to what was he thinking sitting on a board when he was ineligible and why he sat silently while a grave injustice was carried out and he cast his vote with this body. Maybe ethics is not important to him either or the intent or meaning of our state statutes.

Popular posts from this blog

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...