Thursday, June 19, 2014

Foley’s Non-Campaign And Powell’s Platform


Republican Mayor Boughton of Danbury has bowed out of the gubernatorial campaign, apparently because he could not raise sufficient funds in time to gain access to public financing. When John McKinney appeared in Hartford to debate other Republican candidates for governor, he found himself quite alone.  Mr. Boughton had withdrawn, and Republican Party nominee for governor Tom Foley has been assiduously avoiding debates with other Republican gubernatorial candidates. Odd-makers think it will be a Foley-Malloy gubernatorial race after the primary in August. Joe Visconti is still in the race. Assuming the odds-makers are right, how will Mr. Foley fare against Mr. Malloy?

No one knows because, possibly for strategic reasons, Mr. Foley is playing his cards very close to his vest. Usually, part of a contestant’s hand is shown during primary debates. Before declaring he intended to run again for office, Mr. Malloy said he was delaying his announcement because he wanted to give Republican gubernatorial contestants an opportunity to bloody themselves in a primary campaign. That has not happened. One might consider this an upside, but there is a downside to a quiet, uneventful campaign.


Apart from a few vague assertions at the Republican Party nominating convention, Mr. Foley did not offer up a campaign platform. Party platforms, a usual feature at conventions, have gone by the wayside. Republicans at the state nominating convention this year were casting their ballots for persons, not articulated programs. If a candidate does not offer a platform of some kind early in a race, he or she is simply allowing the contest to be defined by what we might call the correlation of forces: incumbent politicians, campaign propaganda networks and the media, among other shaping influences. It is extremely important in Connecticut, a one-party Democratic state, for Republican gubernatorial prospects to set their own course. By failing to do so, Republicans simply trust fate to decide elections. And here in Connecticut, fate is a Democrat.

What might such a platform or program look like?

Journal Inquirer Managing Editor and columnist Chris Powell put that question to himself recently. His answer to it may be found in one of his columns, “What A Real Campaign For Governor Might Address.”

On education, the state should attend to what Mr. Powell calls social promotion, which has flooded colleges with illiterates and degraded diplomas. End social promotion and see to it that all students can read and figure by, say, fourth grade; a reform of this kind would liquidate about half of Connecticut’s state college system, and the resulting savings then might be used to finance universal preschool, which would remediate “some of the damage done by childbearing outside marriage and save money for many working parents.”

Employee compensation should be frozen for four years. If unions prove obstreperous, the governor should, as an emergency measure, repeal collective bargaining for government employees. State government should withdraw from the pension business and provide “new employees only  with defined-contribution pensions, 401(k)s -- the kind taxpayers have to settle for… Binding arbitration of state and municipal employee union contracts should be repealed, or, better, the arbiters should be elected, since opposition to that by the unions will expose their opposition to democracy.”

Social disintegration might be ameliorated “by outlawing welfare benefits for households with children born outside marriage, with current welfare households grandfathered. State government then should take custody of children born into such neglectful circumstances, and the ‘family reunification’ policy of the state Department of Children and Families should be discarded as the costly and often fatal coddling of the slob culture. When government no longer finances child neglect and abuse, most of it will stop.”

The criminalization of drugs should be replaced with much less expensive drug rehabilitation programs. This measure will end a good deal of violent crime, “as well as most of the work of the criminal-justice system and prisons… With drugs decriminalized, state prosecutors should be directed to focus on government corruption and welfare fraud, which are rampant even as there are virtually no state prosecutions for them.”

The state should require nursing homes to bid competitively for welfare patients. Crony capitalism should be thrown on the dustbin of history: “Direct grants and tax breaks for particular companies in the name of economic development -- corporate welfare -- should be outlawed.”

One may quibble with part or all of such a platform, but this at least is a platform and not a pointless gesture in the direction of a platform.

You cannot beat a bad idea in politics by refusing to offer a compensating good idea. And you cannot hope to beat Mr. Malloy by hoping he has beaten himself. Pursue that course and you will leave a beaten state in the hands of a merciless correlation of forces.

4 comments:

peter brush said...

a beaten state in the hands of a merciless correlation of forces
--------------
Foley doesn't have to give public policy as much thought as Mr. Powell in order to provide an alternative to Muy Mal-loy, but if the State is to avoid the ditch he has to a.)explain to the public the fiscal disaster into which we are plunging, and b.) outline how he will get spending under control even with a Leftist Legislature.
To quibble with Powell; why not get rid of school districts and replace with vouchers? Expecting the government bureaucracies to fix their "system" is obviously unrealistic, and proposing "reforms" is (therefor) not even good politics.
At the Foley website his position on the issues remains vague and, to put it mildly, uninspiring.
-------------
My sensible policies will bring fiscal order to our state, create good paying jobs for working families, restore our cities, improve our business climate, and return honor and integrity to state government. - See more at: http://www.tomfoleyct.com/issues/economy/#sthash.m9CJSLWR.dpuf

dmoelling said...

One of Chris Powell's points you didn't mention was the elimination of "open space" subsidies for rich towns. He notes they are really to keep the poor out. I agree entirely, but it's not the poor they want to keep out, but regular working stiffs.

The democrats have abandoned all pretense of supporting regular workers. Their constituencies are teachers, wealthy professionals with elite aspirations, greens, official minorities and welfare enterprises. They've abandoned industry, brown business, and even civil service unions they don't like such as Corrections Officers and Police.

It's a truly crony approach. The GOP can succeed if they take a no handouts policy that applies to UTC as well as Unions.

Don Pesci said...

PB, DM,

You're right all the way around. I just wanted to mention some of Powell's points. They are all defensible and could be elaborated if Foley took some of them up in a campaign. The problem with the usual Republican non-campaign is that there is very little there in it. Foley appears to be waiting for the misery index to put him in office. Of course, in the absence of a vigorous campaign, any Republican governor will be hobbled by majority Democrats; that’s what Rell was all about. You end up with someone as governor who is pretending to be Malloy.

peter brush said...

They are all defensible and could be elaborated if Foley took some of them up in a campaign.
---------
And, I'd vote for Powell in a heartbeat.
I must say that from what little I can see McKinney is to be given credit for addressing the spending issue. I don't know what can be done to get traction for a real candidate willing to tell the truth. As it is, we can only hope that Foley gets in, and hope against hope he deals more effectively with the legislature than he recently did with the Trumka Thugs. It may be that he appreciates Powell's points, but would he fight for them? Meow.

Featured Post

Rebranding Progressive Democrats In Connecticut

There will be time, there will be time To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet… In a minute there is time For decisions an...