Skip to main content

Obama’s Failing Strategy

WASHINGTON - An overwhelming advantage in experience and lopsided support from working-class and suburban whites have lifted Republican John McCain to a slender lead over Barack Obama less than two months from Election Day -- ALAN FRAM, Associated Press Writer

That is what we call a red flag.

Running short on message, Sen. and presidential aspirant Barack Obama first borrowed an idea from a cartoon bubble and then, for good measure, threw in a trite saying about lipstick and pigs, all to no avail. The moose hunter and her partner have galloped past him in the polls.

Why?

Obama’s Achilles’ heal is his lack of administrative and foreign policy experience. His trip to Germany, France and England earlier in the year was a frenetic attempt to acquire quickly the semblance of foreign policy experience. Palin has the edge on him with respect to administrative experience, and presidential aspirant John McCain is light years ahead of him on the foreign policy front.

Importing Biden into the ticket was a way of infusing the campaign with a large dose of instant experience.

The strategists in the Obama camp were not prepared for McCain’s Vice Presidential choice. For them, Palin’s entrée into the race was a resounding smack upside the head, and not only because she was a woman who threatened to turn the Hillary Clinton herd of disappointed women into the Republican paddock.

Hell hath no fury, the ancient Greeks knew, like a woman scorned, and Obama’s summary rejection of Clinton as a presidential partner seemed to many a scornful act. What were Obama strategists to do now that McCain had chosen as his campaign partner a frontier woman, ex-model, moose hunter, hockey mom and corruption busting governor of Alaska, all bound up in feminine mystique?

Here’s an idea: Let’s attack her!

Now, attacks of this kind are not unusual in American politics. America’s first real political campaign – the Jefferson Adam’s tousle – featured the usual tricks of the trade. Adams and his wife accused Jefferson of being a bloody sans culotte, and an atheist to boot. Jefferson and his eventual vice president, Aaron Burr, accused Adams of harboring monarchical pretensions. Burr plotted first against Adams, thereby displeasing Alexander Hamilton whom he later shot in a duel, and then sought to use the arcane system by which presidents were chosen to hoist himself into the presidency. Everyone used everyone else to spread slanders about. One of the most efficient slanderers was a reporter who managed to uncover a liaison involving Hamilton, who supported Jefferson over Burr because, as he said, he would rather have as president someone who embraced the wrong principles than one who had none. Burr used the slanderer’s talents with some effect against Jefferson. The reporter did not die in his bed full of years. Sometime after the campaign, his lifeless body was dredged out of the Potomac.

Only recently have reporters swooned visibly over tacky campaign tactics.

But the attack on Palin is, to put it in a word, stupid. Not that it is not vicious as well: Palin has been accused of pretending to be pregnant with a Down Syndrome child that was born by her daughter, of pretending to nix the notorious Alaskan bridge to nowhere, of being an earmark queen (she accepted the earmarks before rejecting them), and of lacking the experience one would expect a person to have who is but a heart beat away from the presidency.

Much of this untrue, wildly distorted and dumb.

It is dumb, purely from a strategic point of view, because Obama is running for president -- the beating heart in the White House -- his executive experience is shallower than Palin’s, his foreign policy experience has been acquired through his association with Biden, and he has yet to be interviewed by ABC News's Charlie Gibson who, should the occasion arise, possibly will ask him, somewhat sternly, to summarize the Obama doctrine.

The last president to fashion a presidential doctrine was Harry Truman. Modern presidents have doctrines, many of them, each one neatly tailored to the moment and most of which are conflicting.

And the whole experience shtick is a shame, Obama would be the first to admit. President George Bush, Obama has said in other contexts, has vast experience as a president, and yet his experience leaves much to be desired.

Given the Obama doctrine on the inutility of experience, his attacks on Palin make no sense. He should leave such messy duties to his more experienced vice presidential candidate, barracuda Biden.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...