Wednesday, March 07, 2007

The inevitability doctrine

State Rep. Mike Lawlor, the Chair of the House Judiciary Committee since 1995, a proponent of marriage for gays, has said that the movement in that direction is “inevitable.”

Lawlor and others conceive of marriage as a civil right, and Lawlor has noticed that in the past century civil rights have been expanding. The right to vote once was denied to women, but with a little persistence, women were eventually – Lawlor would say “inevitably” – enfranchised. African Americans, once treated as chattel, first won their emancipation in a brutal Civil War and later, during the Civil Rights decade of Martin Luther King, won a victory over Jim Crow. The “enfranchisement” of gays – specifically endowing them with the “right” to marry – is next on the Civil Rights docket, and it is "inevitable" that the case should be decided in favor of gays.

The Lawlor theory runs aground on the perception that in politics only death, an unfortunate by-product of the human condition and apparently the only practical means of purging the body politic of calcified incumbents, and taxes are inevitable. Lawlor, serving his eleventh term as a member of the House of Representatives, has worked diligently to assure that taxes in Connecticut continue to defy the law of gravity; they always go up and never come down.

There are some important differences between marriage and voting. Marriage is principally a religious institution and, unlike voting based on citizenship, is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. Some people think that constitutional rights are infinitely elastic, but this theory runs aground on the notion, common in constitutional interpretation, that you cannot extend a right infinitely in one direction because the right will collide with an equally valuable constitutional right.

Gay rights already have collided with religious rights; the rights, privileges and immunities of both must, when necessary, be accommodated.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Of course Lawler's hope is that if he says it's "inevitable" that people will buy into his notion that those against it should be "hopeless". He is banking on this continued message to be repeated. of course if people hear it enough they may believe it.

The fact of the matter is that gay marriage is being defeated at the polls in many states across the country. I don't see that as evidence of "inevitability".

The gay lobby's only real hope of "inevitability" of gay marriage is the continued brainwashing of children in government schools across the country to accept gay marriage/relationships as normal and acceptable, and including the gay agenda in almost all areas of learning. It's sort of similar of the madrassas in the Middle East teaching the kids that Jews are pigs.

In reality there are statistically not that many gays demanding marriage - it is a small population in relation to the rest of the country - They are like the small dog who makes a lot of noise. Unfortunately they seek to turn tradition on its head primarily for this small population. To compare it to the civil rights movement is incredibly historically incorrect and yet another lie they wish to perpetuate for the gain of a few.

What is more inevitable is the growth of Conservatives who are having large families while Liberals who abort their own dwindle in population.

Featured Post

Trump And The 2020 Connecticut Presidential Campaign

Connecticut Democrats ran against Trump in the last off-year presidential election, and he was not on the ballot. There were no ringing ...